
%0 Journal Article
%A Brodie, Ross 
%A Lane, Richard 
%T The Importance of Accurate Altimetry in AEM Surveys for Land Management
%J ASEG Extended Abstracts
%D 2003/08/01
%V 2003
%N 2
%P 1-5
%K 
%R https://doi.org/10.1071/ASEG2003AB094
%U https://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/ASEG2003AB094 
%X Airborne electromagnetic (AEM) systems are increasingly being used for mapping conductivity in areas susceptible to secondary salinity, with particular attention on near-surface predictions (ie those in the top 5 or 10 metres). Since measured AEM response is strongly dependent on the height of both the transmitter loop and receiver coil above conductive material, errors in measurements of terrain clearance translate directly into significant errors in predicted near-surface conductivity. Radar altimetry has been the standard in airborne geophysical systems for measuring terrain clearance. In areas of agricultural activity significant artifacts up to five metres in magnitude can be present. One class of error, related to surface roughness and soil moisture levels in ploughed paddocks and hence termed the ``paddock effect', results in overestimation of terrain clearance. A second class of error, related to dense vegetation and hence termed the ``canopy effect', results in underestimation of terrain clearance. A survey example where terrain clearance was measured using both a radar and a laser altimeter illustrates the consequences of the paddock and canopy effects on shallow conductivity predictions. The survey example shows that the combination of the dependence of AEM response on terrain clearance and systematic radar altimeter artefacts spatially coincident with areas of differing land-use may falsely imply that land-use practices are the controlling influence on conductivity variations in the near surface. A laser altimeter is recommended for AEM applications since this device is immune to the paddock effect. Careful processing is still required to minimise canopy effects. 
