
%0 Journal Article
%A Witten, Ben 
%A Shragge, Jeffrey 
%T Extended imaging conditions for passive seismic data
%J ASEG Extended Abstracts
%D 2015/03/12
%V 2015
%N 1
%P 1-4
%K 
%R https://doi.org/10.1071/ASEG2015AB225
%U https://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/ASEG2015AB225 
%X Seismic monitoring at injection sites (e.g., CO2 sequestration, hydraulic fracturing) has become an increasingly common tool amongst oil and gas producers. The information obtained from these data is often limited to seismic event properties (e.g., location, initiation time, moment tensor), the accuracy of which greatly depends on the assumed or estimated elastic velocity models. However, estimating accurate 3D velocity models from passive array data remains a challenging problem. Extended imaging conditions (eICs) for passive wave-equation imaging algorithms represent a key step towards generating &#x2013; and verifying &#x2013; elastic velocity models. By extending imaging conditions away from zero-lag in time and space we can better evaluate the focusing of a given event based on the principle that waves focus at zero lag only when the velocity models are &#34;correct&#34;. We demonstrate that given an elastic medium and multi-component recordings, we can propagate and correlate microseismic P- and S-wavefield modes to compute eICs for P- and S- velocity perturbations. We observe that the maximum correlation deviates from the zero-lag in time and space for a P/S cross-correlation imaging condition when using an incorrect P- and/or S-wave velocity, and thus there is sensitivity to velocity error not observable when using individual wavefield components. 
