
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Thiel, Stephan 
A1  - Curtis, Stacey 
A1  - Reid, Anthony 
A1  - Robertson, Graham Heinson Kate 
T1  - Identifying Lithospheric Boundaries and Their Importance for Mineral Discovery
JF  - ASEG Extended Abstracts
JO  - ASEG Extended Abstracts
Y1  - 2018
VL  - 2018
IS  - 1
SP  - 1
EP  - 4
KW  - 
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1071/ASEG2018ABM2_3G 
N2  - Major lithospheric boundaries under cover have commonly been recognised through tracing of potential field anomalies, such as extensive magnetic boundaries representing margins of upper crustal packages in conjunction with density contrast. Here, we extend the investigation of domain mapping to include isotope geochemistry and deep-probing magnetotelluric data, which are able to map the deeper crustal and mantle lithosphere. We demonstrate with examples across the Kalinjala Shear Zone, South Australia, and the Eastern Gawler Craton, that major lithospheric domain boundaries exert a primary control on the location of mineral deposits near the surface. We show examples of correlating magnetotelluric models derived from the Australian Lithospheric Magnetotelluric Project (AusLAMP) and higher density broadband magnetotelluric deployments along profiles with isotope geochemistry across major lithospheric boundaries in South Australia. As one example, the Kalinjala Shear Zone in the southern Gawler Craton can be better constrained using the additional geochemical and magnetotelluric data sets and solve a long-standing debate about the northern extension of the Kalinjala Shear Zone towards the prospective Olympic Province, which hosts, major IOCG deposits. These insights have led to the development of future exploration programs which focus on in-fill broadband deployments for MT and isotope mapping to trace major lithosphere boundaries to the surface, reducing risk for mineral exploration. 
ER  -

