Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR07062
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 34(7)

Pest or prized possession? Genetically modified biocontrol from an international perspective

Wendy R. Henderson A C and Elaine C. Murphy A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre, University of Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

B Department of Conservation, PO Box 13049, Christchurch, New Zealand.

C Corresponding author. Email: wendy.henderson@invasiveanimals.com

Wildlife Research 34(7) 578-585 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR07062
Submitted: 25 May 2007  Accepted: 5 October 2007   Published: 13 December 2007

Abstract

This article provides an overview of current research, regulations and international issues concerning genetically modified (GM) organisms for use as biological controls of vertebrates. There is increasing interest in using biotechnology to solve vertebrate pest problems around the world. A major issue lies in the fact that individual countries focusing on internal problems of pest management may overlook the potential of transborder entry. Animals considered a pest in one country may well be prized possessions in another, and research and management strategies should consider the adverse effects of biocontrol agents entering the ‘wrong’ country. There is a wealth of guidance in the form of national and international regulations and ethics guidelines. However, current legislation and agreements may not be adequate to ensure that all risks of GM biocontrols, particularly disseminating agents, have been considered from an international perspective. Major issues include concerns of transboundary movement, non-target effects and the need for an international body to consult with and regulate the use of GM biocontrols. We live in a finite and interconnected world: it is vital that impacts of potential control strategies are assessed at a local and international level, and from social, environmental and economic perspectives.


Acknowledgements

The authors thank Brian Cooke, Robert Henzell, Chris Hardy, Lyn Hinds, Rod Hay, John Dowding and Greg Sherley for constructive discussions in this area.


References

Angulo, E. , and Bárcena, J. (2007). Towards a unique and transmissible vaccine against myxomatosis and rabbit haemorrhagic disease for rabbit populations. Wildlife Research 34, 567–577.
Anon.  (2007). Canada Norway Expert Workshop on Risk Assessment for Emerging Applications of Living Modified Organisms. 4–6 June 2007, Montreal. Report to Government of Norway. (http://www.regjeringen.no/Upload/MD/Vedlegg/Naturmangfold/Fremmede%20arter/Risk%20Assessment_Workshop_rapport%20FINAL_juli07.pdf)

Atkinson I. A. E. (1989). Introduced animals and extinctions. In ‘Conservation for the Twenty-First Century’. (Ed. D. Western and M. Pearl.) pp. 54–69. (Oxford: New York.)

Bárcena, J. , Morales, M. , Vazquez, B. , Boga, J. A. , Parra, F. , Lucientes, J. , Pages-Mante, A. , Sanchez-Vizcaino, J. M. , Blasco, R. , and Torres, J. M. (2000). Horizontal transmissible protection against myxomatosis and rabbit hemorrhagic disease by using a recombinant myxoma virus. Journal of Virology 74, 1114–1123.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2000). The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. CBD: http://www.cbd.int/biosafety/protocol.shtml

CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2002). Decision VI/23: Alien species that threaten ecosystems, habitats or species. Sixth Conference of the Parties, 7–19 April 2002. CBD: http://www.biodiv.org/decisions/default.aspx?dec=VI/23

CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2004). Biosafety considerations in the use of genetically modified organisms for management of animal populations. CBD. Biosafety Clearing House. Online conference archived at http://bch.biodiv.org/onlineconferences/gmoam.shtml

CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2006). UNEP/CBD/COP/8/25 Cooperation with other conventions, organizations and initiatives and engagement of stakeholders, including options for a global partnership. CBD: http://www.biodiv.org/doc/meetings/cop/cop-08/official/cop-08-25-en.doc

CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2007). Report of the Compliance Committee under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety on the work of its third meeting. CBD: http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/bs/bscc-03/official/bscc-03-03-en.pdf

Cliquet, F. , and Aubert, M. (2003). Elimination of terrestrial rabies in western European countries Developmental Biology 119, 185–204.
ERMANZ (Environmental Risk Management Authority of New Zealand) (2005). Ethics Framework, ERMANZ, New Zealand. http://www.ermanz.govt.nz/resources/publications/pdfs/ER-PR-05-1.pdf

Galloway Maclean, K. (2005). Bridging the gap between researchers and policy-makers: international collaboration through the Biosafety Clearing-House. Environmental Biosafety Research 4, 123–126.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | GTEC (Gene Technology Ethics Committee) (2006). Draft national framework for the development of ethical principles in gene technology. GTEC, Australia.

Hamilton, P. B. , Stevens, J. R. , Holz, P. , Boag, B. , Cooke, B. , and Gibson, W. C. (2005). The inadvertent introduction into Australia of Trypanosoma nabiasi, the trypanosome of the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus), and its potential for biocontrol. Molecular Ecology 14, 3167–3175.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | IPPC (International Plant Protection Convention) Secretariat (2005a). ISPM No. 03 (2005) Guidelines for the export, shipment, import and release of biological control agents and other beneficial organisms. International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures no. 1 to 24 (2005 edition). (FAO) https://www.ippc.int/servlet/BinaryDownloaderServlet/76047_ISPM_3_E.pdf?filename=1146657660135_ISPM3.pdf&refID=76047

IPPC (International Plant Protection Convention) Secretariat (2005b). ISPM No. 11 (2004) Pest risk analysis for quarantine pests including analysis of environmental risks and living modified organisms. International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures 1 to 24 (2005 edition). (FAO) https://www.ippc.int/servlet/BinaryDownloaderServlet/34163_ISPM_11_E.pdf?filename=1146658377367_ISPM11.pdf&refID=34163

Kapuscinski A. R., and Patronski T. J. (2005). Genetic methods for biological control of non-native fish in the Gila River basin. Minnesota Sea Grant Publication F 20. University of Minnesota, Minnesota. http://www.seagrant.umn.edu/fish/GenBiocontrol.pdf

Louda, S. M. , Pemberton, R. W. , Johnson, M. T. , and Follett, P. A. (2003). Nontarget effects – the Achilles heel of biological control? Retrospective analyses to reduce risk associated with biocontrol introductions. Annual Review of Entomology 48, 365–396.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Molloy K. L., and Henderson W. R. (Ed.) (2006). Science of cane toad management and control. In ‘Proceedings of the IA CRC/CSIRO/QLD NRM&W Cane Toad Workshop’. (Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre: Canberra.)

Nowak R. (2003). Biocontrol arms race looms. New Scientist 2410. http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg17924100.900-biocontrol-arms-race-looms.html

Newton-Howes, J. , Heath, D. D. , Shoemaker, C. B. , and Grant, W. N. (2006). Characterisation and expression of an Hsp70 gene from Parastrongyloides trichosuri. International Journal for Parasitology 36, 467–474.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | OIE (World Organization for Animal Health) (2005). Biotechnology applications in animal heath and production. Office International des Epizooties Scientific and Technical Review 24. (http://www.oie.int/eng/publicat/RT/A_RT24_1.htm)

OIE (2006). Terrestrial Animal Health Code. OIE: http://www.oie.int/eng/publicat/en_code.htm

OIE (2007). Aquatic Animal Health Code. OIE: http://www.oie.int/eng/normes/fcode/A_summry.htm

Omlin D. (1997). Tools for safety assessment of Vaccinia-derived recombinant rabies vaccine. Agency for Biosafety Research and Assessment of Technology Impacts (BATS), Swiss Priority Programme Biotechnology. http://www.bats.ch/bats/publikationen/1997-1_vaccinia/safety_assessment_vaccine.pdf

Parkes, J. P. , Norbury, G. L. , Heyward, R. P. , and Sullivan, G. (2002). Epidemiology of rabbit haemorrhagic disease (RHD) in the South Island, New Zealand, 1997–2001. Wildlife Research 29, 543–555.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Thresher R., and Bax N. (2003). The science of producing daughterless technology: possibilities for population control using daughterless technology; maximising the impact of carp control. In ‘Proceedings of The National Carp Control Workshop’. (Ed. K. L. Lapidge.) pp. 19–24. (Cooperative Research Centre for Pest Animal Control: Canberra.)

Torres, J. M. , Ramirez, M. A. , Morales, M. , Bárcena, J. , Vazquez, B. , Espuna, E. , Pages-Mante, A. , and Sanchez-Vizcaino, J. M. (2000). Safety evaluation of a recombinant myxoma–RHDV virus inducing horizontal transmissible protection against myxomatosis and rabbit haemorrhagic disease. Vaccine 19, 174–182.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | United Nations (1993). Multilateral convention on biological diversity (with annexes). United Nations Treaty Series 1760 (I–30619), pp. 142–308. http://www.biodiv.org/doc/legal/cbd-un-en.pdf

van Leeuwen, B. H. , and Kerr, P. J. (2007). Prospects for fertility control in the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) using myxoma virus-vectored immunocontraception. Wildlife Research 34, 511–522.
WTO (World Trade Organization) (1995). The WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement). WTO: http://www.wto.org/English/tratop_e/sps_e/spsagr_e.htm