Spatial relationships and temporal variability in a littoral macrophyte fish assemblage
S. R. Balcombe A C D and G. P. Closs BA CRC for Freshwater Ecology, Department of Environmental Management and Ecology, LaTrobe University, PO Box 821, Wodonga, Vic. 3689, Australia.
B Department of Zoology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand.
C Present address: CRC for Freshwater Ecology, Centre for Riverine Landscapes, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: s.balcombe@griffith.edu.au
Marine and Freshwater Research 55(6) 609-617 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF03170
Submitted: 25 September 2003 Accepted: 20 May 2004 Published: 14 September 2004
Abstract
The presence of macrophytes in lentic systems often exerts a large influence on the spatial and temporal dynamics of the small-bodied fish that inhabit them, particularly in the presence of piscivorous predators. To examine spatial and temporal patterns of fish abundance in macrophyte stands we sampled fish bimonthly with fine-meshed fish traps by day and night in giant rush habitats of a River Murray billabong between October 1995 and September 1996. Three native and three exotic species were found within these habitats during the study, however, catches were dominated by two species of native carp gudgeons (Hypseleotris spp.). Consistently higher numbers of gudgeons were trapped during the day than at night throughout the study period and there was a sustained decline in catch from spring in the first year to the following spring. The results suggest recruitment of juvenile fish spawned during the summer was insufficient for relative abundance to return to the high numbers found at the start of the study. Fine-scale distribution of carp gudgeons within emergent macrophytes was not generally explained by variability in either physical structure or physicochemical variability. This contrasts with many studies of small fish assemblages in macrophytes where piscivorous predators are present.
Extra keywords: billabong, diel period, Hypseleotris, predation, recruitment, seasonal patterns, water level variation.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by LaTrobe University and CRC for Freshwater Ecology Postgraduate Stipends. The research was conducted under Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Permit No. FSP/CW/145 and LaTrobe University Animal Ethics Permit LSB95/21.
Angermeier, P. L. , and Karr, J. R. (1984). Relationships between woody debris and fish habitat in a small warmwater stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113, 716–726.
Lieschke, J. A. , and Closs, G. P. (1999). Regulation of zooplankton composition and distribution by a zooplanktivorous fish in a shallow, eutrophic floodplain lake in south east Australia. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 146, 397–412.
Lloyd, L. N. , and Walker, K. F. (1986). Distribution and conservation of small freshwater fish of the River Murray, South Australia. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 110, 49–57.
Meredith, S. N. , Matveev, V. F. , and Myes, P. (2003). Spatial and temporal variability in the distribution and diet of the gudgeon (Eleotridae: Hypseleotris spp.) in a subtropical Australian reservoir. Marine and Freshwater Research 54, 1009–1017.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mittelbach, G. G. (1988). Competition among refuging sunfishes and effects of fish density on littoral zone invertebrates. Ecology 69, 614–623.
Naud, M. , and Magnan, P. (1988). Diel onshore-offshore migrations in redbelly dace, Phoxinus eos (Cope), in relation to prey distribution in a small oligotrophic lake. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66, 1249–1253.
Norris, R. H., Liston, P., Davies, N., Coysh, J., Dyer, F., Linke, S., Prosser, I., and Young, W. (2001).
Persson, L. (1987). The effects of resource availability and distribution on size class interactions in perch, Perca fluviatilis. Oikos 48, 148–160.
Persson, L. (1991). Behavioral response to predators reverses the outcome of competition between prey species. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 28, 101–105.
Persson, L. (1993). Predator-mediated competition in prey refuges: the importance of habitat dependent prey resources. Oikos 68, 12–22.
Petty, J. T. , and Grossman, G. D. (1996). Patch selection by mottled sculpin (Pisces : Cottidae) in a southern Appalachian stream. Freshwater Biology 35, 261–276.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Piet, G. J. , and Guruge, W. A. H. P. (1997). Diel variation in feeding and vertical distribution of ten co-occurring fish species: consequences for resource partitioning. Environmental Biology of Fishes 50, 293–307.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pressey, R. L. (1986). ‘River Murray Commission Environmental Report 86/1’. (River Murray Commission: Canberra, Australia.)
Ross, S. T. , McMichael, R. H. , and Ruple, D. L. (1987). Seasonal and diel variation in the standing crop of fishes and macroinvertebrates from a Gulf of Mexico surf zone. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 25, 391–412.
Schiller, C. B. and Harris, J. H. (2001). Native and alien fish. In
Schramm, H. L. Jr, , and Jirka, K. L. (1989). Epiphytic macroinvertebrates as a food resource for bluegills in Florida lakes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 118, 416–426.
Shiel, R. J. (1980). Billabongs of the Murray-Darling system. In
Shirley, M. J. (2002). ‘The Ecology of Billabong Fish Communities of the River Murray, with a Focus on the Interactions of European Perch (Perca fluviatilis).’ PhD Thesis. (Monash University: Melbourne, Australia.)
Stoffels, R. J. , and Humphries, P. (2003). Ontogenetic variation in the diurnal food and habitat associations of an endemic and an exotic fish in floodplain ponds: consequences for niche partitioning. Environmental Biology of Fishes 66, 293–305.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Swales, S. (1987). The use of small wire-mesh traps in sampling juvenile salmonids. Aquaculture and Fisheries Management 18, 187–195.
Tonn, W. M. , and Magnusson, J. J. (1982). Patterns in the species composition and richness of fish assemblages in northern Wisconsin lakes. Ecology 63, 1149–1166.
Werner, E. E. , Gilliam, J. F. , Hall, D. J. , and Mittelbach, G. G. (1983). An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64, 1540–1548.
Werner, E. E. , and Hall, D. J. (1988). Ontogenetic habitat shifts in the bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus): The foraging rate-predation risk tradeoff. Ecology 69, 1352–1366.
Werner, E. E. , Hall, D. J. , Lauglin, D. R. , Wagner, D. J. , Wilsman, L. A. , and Funk, F. C. (1977). Habitat partitioning in a freshwater fish community. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board Canada 34, 360–370.
Wilkinson, L. (1996).
Winfield, I. J. (1986). The influence of simulated aquatic macrophytes on the zooplankton consumption rate of juvenile roach, Rutilus rutilus, rudd, Scardinius erythrophthalmus, and perch, Perca fluviatilis. Journal of Fish Biology 29, 37–48.
