
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Walkden-Brown, SW 
A1  - Restall, BJ 
A1  - Taylor, WA 
T1  - Testicular and epididymal sperm content in grazing Cashmere bucks: seasonal variation and prediction from measurements in vivo
JF  - Reproduction, Fertility and Development
JO  - Reprod. Fertil. Dev.
Y1  - 1994
VL  - 6
IS  - 6
SP  - 727
EP  - 736
KW  - 
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1071/RD9940727 
N2  - Each month, for 15 months, the testes and epididymides were recovered from five Australian cashmere bucks selected at random from a group of mature bucks (initial n = 116) at pasture (location 29 degrees S, 153 degrees E). The extent of seasonal change in testicular and epididymal sperm reserves was determined and indirect methods for predicting these reserves were developed. Paired testicular weight exhibited clear seasonal variation from 137 g in August to 269 g in February. The total elongated spermatid content of the testes, determined by homogenization, showed a very similar seasonal pattern, ranging from 13.8 x 10(9) in September to 36.2 x 10(9) in March. Seasonal changes of similar timing were observed for paired epididymal weight and sperm content. Although changes in total testicular spermatid content were largely the result of change in testicular weight (R2 = 0.72, P < 0.001), the elongated spermatid content of testicular parenchyma (mean, 127 x 10(6) g-1) exhibited significant seasonal variation with elevated values between February and June, suggestive of an increase in the efficiency of spermatogenesis. Daily sperm production, calculated by means of a spermatogenic time divisor for sheep, ranged from 2.76 x 10(9) in September to 7.23 x 10(9) in February. Scrotal circumference, scrotal volume and testicular length x diameter2 were identified as accurate predictors of testicular weight (R2 > or = 0.87) and sperm content (R2 > or = 0.70). The results demonstrate that: (a) cashmere bucks exhibit considerable seasonal variation in spermatogenesis associated primarily with changes in testicular mass but also with changes in the efficiency of spermatogenesis; and (b) indirect measures of testicular size are good predictors of testicular elongated sperm content. When the correct spermatogenic time divisor for goats is determined, such indirect measures may be used to predict daily sperm production. 
ER  -

