
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Lodge, G. M. 
A1  - Murphy, S. R. 
T1  - Ground cover in temperate native perennial grass pastures. <br/>II. Relationship with herbage and litter mass
JF  - The Rangeland Journal
JO  - Rangel. J.
Y1  - 2002
VL  - 24
IS  - 2
SP  - 301
EP  - 312
KW  - ground cover, herbage mass, litter mass, total mass, native pastures.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ02017 
N2  - Studies were conducted to examine the relationship between ground cover and herbage mass; ground cover and litter mass; herbage mass and litter mass, and, ground cover and total (herbage and litter) mass for two grazed, native pastures in the high rainfall, temperate rangelands of northern NSW. Ground cover was visually estimated by two experienced observers, litter (unattached plant material) was collected and herbage mass was estimated by harvesting to ground level in 30 quadrats (40 by 40 cm). Data were collected for 16 sampling times at the change of season and from spring 1997 to spring 2000 (a total of 465 quadrats at each site) and examined by regression analysis for the mean data for each level of ground cover and for data from individual quadrats. The relationship between ground cover and herbage, litter or total mass was logarithmic at each site. The logarithmic nature of the relationship reflected the occurrence of low herbage, litter and total mass even when ground cover was 100%. For the mean data, herbage and total mass accounted for 68&#8211;77% of the variation in ground cover, but for the individual quadrat data these variables accounted for 42&#8211;53% and 43&#8211;55%, respectively of this variation. Litter and herbage mass had a low correlation (R2&#60;&#126;0.20) and for the mean data litter mass accounted for around 40&#8211;60% of the variation in ground cover, compared with 15&#8211;21% for the individual quadrats. Some seasonal differences in these relationships were apparent and these were attributed to the occurrence of annual forb and legume species that had different growth habits to those of the native perennial grasses. For these pastures the data indicated that herbage mass could not be used as a surrogate measure of ground cover or litter mass. 
ER  -

