Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

A cross-sectional study of male and female kissing partners among men who have sex with men

Eric P. F. Chow https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1766-0657 A B C * , Tiffany R. Phillips https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6920-7710 A B , Julien Tran A B , Ei T. Aung https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2560-3233 A B , Kate Maddaford https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5213-1289 A and Christopher K. Fairley https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9081-1664 A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Vic. 3053, Australia.

B Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic. 3004, Australia.

C Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic. 3053, Australia.

* Correspondence to: eric.chow@monash.edu

Handling Editor: Ian Simms

Sexual Health 19(1) 27-32 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH21184
Submitted: 22 September 2021  Accepted: 30 November 2021   Published: 4 March 2022

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Background: Kissing may be a risk factor for gonorrhoea. Past studies have focused on male kissing partners among men who have sex with men (MSM). This study aimed to examine the kissing practices of MSM who kiss male and female partners.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey at the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC) between March and April 2019. Men attending the MSHC, aged ≥16 years who reported any sexual contact with another man in the previous 12 months were invited to participate in the survey. Data about the number of kissing-only (kissing without sex), kissing-with-sex, and sex-only (having sex without kissing) partners in the previous 3 months were collected. Men were asked to report the number of male and female partners separately.

Results: There were 357 MSM included in the survey. Most men (97.2%, n = 347) had kissed or had sex with another man, whereas 16.0% (n = 57) had kissed or had sex with a female partner in the previous 3 months. Of the 57 men, 26.3% (n = 15) had only kissed a female partner without having sex. The mean number of male partners for kissing-only was 5.5 (s.d. = 6.6), kissing-with-sex was 5.0 (s.d. = 6.6) and sex-only was 3.9 (s.d. = 4.3). The mean number of female partners for kissing-only was 4.2 (s.d. = 6.9), kissing-with-sex was 3.8 (s.d. = 4.9) and sex-only was 3.2 (s.d. = 3.4).

Conclusion: MSM not only kiss men in the absence of sex, but also kiss women in the absence of sex. Gonorrhoea could be transmitted between MSM and women via kissing in the absence of sex.

Keywords: bisexual, gay, gonorrhoea, kiss, pharyngeal, prevention, saliva, sexually transmitted infection, transmission.


References

[1]  Chow EPF, Grulich AE, Fairley CK. Epidemiology and prevention of sexually transmitted infections in men who have sex with men at risk of HIV. Lancet HIV 2019; 6 e396–405.
Epidemiology and prevention of sexually transmitted infections in men who have sex with men at risk of HIV.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31006612PubMed |

[2]  Martín-Sánchez M, Case R, Fairley C, Hocking JS, Bradshaw C, Ong J, et al. Trends and differences in sexual practices and sexually transmitted infections in men who have sex with men only (MSMO) and men who have sex with men and women (MSMW): a repeated cross-sectional study in Melbourne, Australia. BMJ Open 2020; 10 e037608
Trends and differences in sexual practices and sexually transmitted infections in men who have sex with men only (MSMO) and men who have sex with men and women (MSMW): a repeated cross-sectional study in Melbourne, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33234617PubMed |

[3]  Phillips TR, Fairley CK, Chen MY, Bradshaw CS, Chow EPF. Risk factors for urethral gonorrhoea infection among heterosexual males in Melbourne, Australia: 2007–17. Sex Health 2019; 16 508–13.
Risk factors for urethral gonorrhoea infection among heterosexual males in Melbourne, Australia: 2007–17.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31203836PubMed |

[4]  Jasek E, Chow EP, Ong JJ, Bradshaw CS, Chen MY, Hocking JS, et al. Sexually transmitted infections in Melbourne, Australia from 1918 to 2016: nearly a century of data. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep 2017; 41 E212–22.
| 29720070PubMed |

[5]  Misson J, Chow EPF, Chen MY, Read TRH, Bradshaw CS, Fairley CK. Trends in gonorrhoea infection and overseas sexual contacts among females attending a sexual health centre in Melbourne, Australia, 2008–2015. Commun Dis Intell 2018; 42 S2209-6051(18)00024-6 https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/79C7257732247646CA2582A6000D6345/$File/Trends%20in%20gonorrhoea%20infection%20and%20overseas%20sexual%20contacts%20among%20females%20attending%20a%20sexual%20health%20centre%20in%20Melbourne%2C%20Australia%2C%202008-2015.pdf

[6]  Chow EPF, Fairley CK, Williamson DA, Chen MY. Spatial mapping of gonorrhoea notifications by sexual practice in Victoria, Australia, 2017–2019. Aust N Z J Public Health 2021; 45 672–74.
Spatial mapping of gonorrhoea notifications by sexual practice in Victoria, Australia, 2017–2019.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 34762335PubMed |

[7]  Chow EP, Williamson DA, Fortune R, Bradshaw CS, Chen MY, Fehler G, et al. Prevalence of genital and oropharyngeal chlamydia and gonorrhoea among female sex workers in Melbourne, Australia, 2015–2017: need for oropharyngeal testing. Sex Transm Infect 2019; 95 398–401.
Prevalence of genital and oropharyngeal chlamydia and gonorrhoea among female sex workers in Melbourne, Australia, 2015–2017: need for oropharyngeal testing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31113904PubMed |

[8]  Chan PA, Robinette A, Montgomery M, Almonte A, Cu-Uvin S, Lonks JR, et al. Extragenital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a review of the literature. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2016; 2016 5758387
Extragenital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27366021PubMed |

[9]  Unemo M, Seifert HS, Hook EW, Hawkes S, Ndowa F, Dillon J-AR. Gonorrhoea. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2019; 5 79
Gonorrhoea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31754194PubMed |

[10]  van Liere GAFS, Dukers-Muijrers NHTM, Kuizenga-Wessel S, Wolffs PFG, Hoebe CJPA. Routine universal testing versus selective or incidental testing for oropharyngeal Neisseria gonorrhoeae in women in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 2021; 21 858–67.
Routine universal testing versus selective or incidental testing for oropharyngeal Neisseria gonorrhoeae in women in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33444559PubMed |

[11]  Allen C, Fairley CK, Chen MY, Maddaford K, Ong JJ, Williamson DA, et al. Oropharyngeal gonorrhoea infections among heterosexual women and heterosexual men with urogenital gonorrhoea attending a sexual health clinic in Melbourne, Australia. Clin Microbiol Infect 2021; 27 1799–804.
Oropharyngeal gonorrhoea infections among heterosexual women and heterosexual men with urogenital gonorrhoea attending a sexual health clinic in Melbourne, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33845205PubMed |

[12]  Chow EPF, Chen MY, Williamson DA, Bradshaw CS, Vodstrcil LA, Trumpour S, et al. Oropharyngeal and genital gonorrhea infections among women and heterosexual men reporting sexual contact with partners with gonorrhea: implication for oropharyngeal testing of heterosexual gonorrhea contacts. Sex Transm Dis 2019; 46 743–7.
Oropharyngeal and genital gonorrhea infections among women and heterosexual men reporting sexual contact with partners with gonorrhea: implication for oropharyngeal testing of heterosexual gonorrhea contacts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31517767PubMed |

[13]  Chow EPF, Cornelisse VJ, Williamson DA, Priest D, Hocking JS, Bradshaw CS, et al. Kissing may be an important and neglected risk factor for oropharyngeal gonorrhoea: a cross-sectional study in men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Infect 2019; 95 516–21.
Kissing may be an important and neglected risk factor for oropharyngeal gonorrhoea: a cross-sectional study in men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31073095PubMed |

[14]  Cornelisse VJ, Bradshaw CS, Chow EPF, Williamson DA, Fairley CK. Oropharyngeal gonorrhea in absence of urogenital gonorrhea in sexual network of male and female participants, Australia, 2018. Emerg Infect Dis 2019; 25 1373–6.
Oropharyngeal gonorrhea in absence of urogenital gonorrhea in sexual network of male and female participants, Australia, 2018.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31211673PubMed |

[15]  Kilner A, Fairley CK, Burrell S, Bradshaw CS, Chen MY, Chow EPF. Age pattern of sexual activities with the most recent partner among men who have sex with men in Melbourne, Australia: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Sex Reprod Health 2021; 47 e4
Age pattern of sexual activities with the most recent partner among men who have sex with men in Melbourne, Australia: a cross-sectional study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32868336PubMed |

[16]  Herbenick D, Fu T-J, Owens C, Bartelt E, Dodge B, Reece M, et al. Kissing, cuddling, and massage at most recent sexual event: findings from a U.S. nationally representative probability sample. J Sex Marital Ther 2019; 45 159–72.
Kissing, cuddling, and massage at most recent sexual event: findings from a U.S. nationally representative probability sample.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30040548PubMed |

[17]  Rosenberger JG, Reece M, Schick V, Herbenick D, Novak DS, Van Der Pol B, et al. Sexual behaviors and situational characteristics of most recent male-partnered sexual event among gay and bisexually identified men in the United States. J Sex Med 2011; 8 3040–50.
Sexual behaviors and situational characteristics of most recent male-partnered sexual event among gay and bisexually identified men in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21883941PubMed |

[18]  Fairley CK, Hocking JS, Zhang L, Chow EPF. Frequent transmission of gonorrhea in men who have sex with men. Emerg Infect Dis 2017; 23 102–4.
Frequent transmission of gonorrhea in men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27983487PubMed |

[19]  Chow EPF, Vodstrcil LA, Fairley CK. Seasonal variations in kissing and sexual activities among men who have sex with men in Melbourne, Australia: implications for seasonal sexually transmissible infection preventions and interventions. Sex Health 2020; 17 149–54.
Seasonal variations in kissing and sexual activities among men who have sex with men in Melbourne, Australia: implications for seasonal sexually transmissible infection preventions and interventions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32135076PubMed |

[20]  Chow EPF, Vodstrcil LA, Williamson DA, Maddaford K, Hocking JS, Ashcroft M, et al. Incidence and duration of incident oropharyngeal gonorrhoea and chlamydia infections among men who have sex with men: prospective cohort study. Sex Transm Infect 2021; 97 452–7.
Incidence and duration of incident oropharyngeal gonorrhoea and chlamydia infections among men who have sex with men: prospective cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33208509PubMed |

[21]  Charleson FJ, Fairley CK, Hocking JS, Vodstrcil LA, Bradshaw CS, Chow EPF. Age, ethnic and travel-related disparities in kissing and sexual practices among heterosexual men in Melbourne, Australia. Sex Health 2020; 17 279–87.
Age, ethnic and travel-related disparities in kissing and sexual practices among heterosexual men in Melbourne, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32571477PubMed |

[22]  Constantinou H, Fairley CK, Hocking JS, Bradshaw CS, Choi EPH, Maddaford K, et al. Associations between methods of meeting sexual partners and sexual practices among heterosexuals: cross-sectional study in Melbourne, Australia. JMIR Form Res 2021; 5 e26202
Associations between methods of meeting sexual partners and sexual practices among heterosexuals: cross-sectional study in Melbourne, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 34283024PubMed |

[23]  Chow EPF, Tomnay J, Fehler G, Whiley D, Read TRH, Denham I, et al. Substantial increases in chlamydia and gonorrhea positivity unexplained by changes in individual-level sexual behaviors among men who have sex with men in an Australian sexual health service from 2007 to 2013. Sex Transm Dis 2015; 42 81–7.
Substantial increases in chlamydia and gonorrhea positivity unexplained by changes in individual-level sexual behaviors among men who have sex with men in an Australian sexual health service from 2007 to 2013.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[24]  Phillips TR, Fairley CK, Bradshaw CS, Hocking JS, Choi EPH, Ong JJ, et al. Brief report: group sex among men who have sex with men in the era of PrEP: a cross-sectional study. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2021; 86 e23–7.
Brief report: group sex among men who have sex with men in the era of PrEP: a cross-sectional study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33093332PubMed |

[25]  Chow EPF, Hocking JS, Bradshaw CS, Phillips TR, Tabesh M, Donovan B, et al. Paying for sex among males and females: a cross-sectional survey in Melbourne, Australia. Sex Transm Dis 2021; 48 195–9.
Paying for sex among males and females: a cross-sectional survey in Melbourne, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33555761PubMed |

[26]  Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, Johnston CM, Muzny CA, Park I, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recomm Rep 2021; 70 1–187.
Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 34292926PubMed |

[27]  Communicable Diseases Section, Victorian Government Department of Human Services. The blue book: guidelines for the control of infectious diseases. Melbourne: State of Victoria, Department of Human Services; 2005. Available at: https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/Api/downloadmedia/%7B0F5A8C5D-8DEC-43D0-8388-7F49067E1BCA%7D [cited 31 August 2021].

[28]  Anderson E, Ripley M, McCormack M. A mixed-method study of same-sex kissing among college-attending heterosexual men in the U.S. Sex Cult 2019; 23 26–44.
A mixed-method study of same-sex kissing among college-attending heterosexual men in the U.S.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[29]  Zhang L, Regan DG, Chow EPF, Gambhir M, Cornelisse V, Grulich A, et al. Neisseria gonorrhoeae transmission among men who have sex with men: an anatomical site-specific mathematical model evaluating the potential preventive impact of mouthwash. Sex Transm Dis 2017; 44 586–92.
Neisseria gonorrhoeae transmission among men who have sex with men: an anatomical site-specific mathematical model evaluating the potential preventive impact of mouthwash.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28876289PubMed |

[30]  Xu X, Chow EPF, Ong JJ, Hoebe C, Williamson D, Shen M, et al. Modelling the contribution that different sexual practices involving the oropharynx and saliva have on Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections at multiple anatomical sites in men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Infect 2021; 97 183–9.
Modelling the contribution that different sexual practices involving the oropharynx and saliva have on Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections at multiple anatomical sites in men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33208511PubMed |

[31]  Cornelisse VJ, Williamson D, Zhang L, Chen MY, Bradshaw C, Hocking JS, et al. Evidence for a new paradigm of gonorrhoea transmission: cross-sectional analysis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections by anatomical site in both partners in 60 male couples. Sex Transm Infect 2019; 95 437–42.
Evidence for a new paradigm of gonorrhoea transmission: cross-sectional analysis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections by anatomical site in both partners in 60 male couples.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30996106PubMed |

[32]  Wi T, Lahra MM, Ndowa F, Bala M, Dillon J-AR, Ramon-Pardo P, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: global surveillance and a call for international collaborative action. PLoS Med 2017; 14 e1002344
Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: global surveillance and a call for international collaborative action.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28686231PubMed |

[33]  Williamson DA, Fairley CK, Howden BP, Chen MY, Stevens K, De Petra V, et al. Trends and risk factors for antimicrobial-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Melbourne, Australia, 2007 to 2018. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2019; 63 e01221–19.
Trends and risk factors for antimicrobial-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Melbourne, Australia, 2007 to 2018.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31383663PubMed |

[34]  Gottlieb SL, Jerse AE, Delany-Moretlwe S, Deal C, Giersing BK. Advancing vaccine development for gonorrhoea and the Global STI Vaccine Roadmap. Sex Health 2019; 16 426–32.
Advancing vaccine development for gonorrhoea and the Global STI Vaccine Roadmap.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31476278PubMed |

[35]  Arnold R, Galloway Y, McNicholas A, O’Hallahan J. Effectiveness of a vaccination programme for an epidemic of meningococcal B in New Zealand. Vaccine 2011; 29 7100–6.
Effectiveness of a vaccination programme for an epidemic of meningococcal B in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21803101PubMed |

[36]  Petousis-Harris H, Paynter J, Morgan J, Saxton P, McArdle B, Goodyear-Smith F, Black S. Effectiveness of a group B outer membrane vesicle meningococcal vaccine against gonorrhoea in New Zealand: a retrospective case-control study. Lancet 2017; 390 1603–10.
Effectiveness of a group B outer membrane vesicle meningococcal vaccine against gonorrhoea in New Zealand: a retrospective case-control study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28705462PubMed |

[37]  Fairley CK, Zhang L, Chow EPF. New thinking on gonorrhoea control in MSM: are antiseptic mouthwashes the answer? Curr Opin Infect Dis 2018; 31 45–9.
New thinking on gonorrhoea control in MSM: are antiseptic mouthwashes the answer?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29176445PubMed |

[38]  Chow EPF, Maddaford K, Trumpour S, Fairley CK. Translating mouthwash use for gonorrhoea prevention into a public health campaign: identifying current knowledge and research gaps. Sex Health 2019; 16 433–41.
Translating mouthwash use for gonorrhoea prevention into a public health campaign: identifying current knowledge and research gaps.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31099331PubMed |

[39]  Van Dijck C, Cuylaerts V, Sollie P, Spychala A, De Baetselier I, Laumen J, et al. The development of mouthwashes without anti-gonococcal activity for controlled clinical trials: an in vitro study. F1000Res 2019; 8 1620
The development of mouthwashes without anti-gonococcal activity for controlled clinical trials: an in vitro study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32089824PubMed |

[40]  Chow EP, Howden BP, Walker S, Lee D, Bradshaw CS, Chen MY, et al. Antiseptic mouthwash against pharyngeal Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a randomised controlled trial and an in vitro study. Sex Transm Infect 2017; 93 88–93.
Antiseptic mouthwash against pharyngeal Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a randomised controlled trial and an in vitro study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27998950PubMed |

[41]  Xu X, Chow EPF, Shen M, Zou Z, Wang C, Ong JJ, et al. Potential effect of antiseptic mouthwash on the incidence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae among men who have sex with men: a mathematical modelling study. BMJ Open 2021; 11 e052823
Potential effect of antiseptic mouthwash on the incidence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae among men who have sex with men: a mathematical modelling study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 34620667PubMed |

[42]  Chow EPF, Williamson DA, Hocking JS, Law MG, Maddaford K, Bradshaw CS, et al. Antiseptic mouthwash for gonorrhoea prevention (OMEGA): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2021; 21 647–56.
Antiseptic mouthwash for gonorrhoea prevention (OMEGA): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33676595PubMed |

[43]  Chow EPF, Fairley CK. Is it the end of mouthwash as an intervention for gonorrhoea? Lancet Infect Dis 2021; 21 763–4.
Is it the end of mouthwash as an intervention for gonorrhoea?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 34051184PubMed |

[44]  Chow EPF, Maddaford K, Hocking JS, Bradshaw CS, Wigan R, Chen MY, et al. An open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial of antiseptic mouthwash versus antibiotics for oropharyngeal gonorrhoea treatment (OMEGA2). Sci Rep 2020; 10 19386
An open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial of antiseptic mouthwash versus antibiotics for oropharyngeal gonorrhoea treatment (OMEGA2).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33168910PubMed |

[45]  Van Dijck C, Tsoumanis A, Rotsaert A, Vuylsteke B, Van den Bossche D, Paeleman E, et al. Antibacterial mouthwash to prevent sexually transmitted infections in men who have sex with men taking HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PReGo): a randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2021; 21 657–67.
Antibacterial mouthwash to prevent sexually transmitted infections in men who have sex with men taking HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PReGo): a randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33676596PubMed |

[46]  Van Dijck C, Tsoumanis A, De Hondt A, Cuylaerts V, Laumen J, Van Herrewege Y. Chlorhexidine mouthwash fails to eradicate oropharyngeal gonorrhea in a clinical pilot trial (MoNg). Sex Transm Dis 2022; 49 e38–41.
Chlorhexidine mouthwash fails to eradicate oropharyngeal gonorrhea in a clinical pilot trial (MoNg).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 34282741PubMed |