An extra pair of eyes: do patients want a chaperone when having an anogenital examination?
James A. Baber A B , Stephen C. Davies A and Linda S. Dayan AA Clinic 16, Department of Sexual Health, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: chewbaber@hotmail.com
Sexual Health 4(2) 89-93 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH06073
Submitted: 19 December 2006 Accepted: 26 February 2007 Published: 23 May 2007
Abstract
Background: Anogenital examinations can be embarrassing for patients and can leave clinicians open to accusations of professional misconduct. Little is known about the attitudes of patients in Australia towards the use of chaperones. Methods: In 2006, we surveyed 480 patients attending two sexual health clinics in northern Sydney. Our aim was to determine their attitudes towards the use of chaperones for anogenital examinations. Results: Of the 480, 58% were male and 42% female. Most women (64%) preferred a female examining clinician, whereas most men (68%) had no preference for gender of the examining clinician (P < 0.0001). While 32% of women wanted a chaperone if being examined by a male, 29% did not. Only 4% of women wanted a chaperone when being examined by a female. Only 1% of men wanted a chaperone irrespective of the sex of the examining clinician. Independent predictors of women wanting a chaperone with a male clinician were preference for a female clinician (OR 6.59, 2.48–17.5; P < 0.001) and preference for a female chaperone (OR 4.02, 1.44–11.2; P = 0.008). The majority of participants felt that they should be involved in the decision to have a chaperone. Conclusions: Although a substantial minority of women want a chaperone when being examined by a male, a similar proportion do not want a chaperone. If a woman requests a female clinician, she should be offered a chaperone if there is only a male examiner available. Further study is required to determine why some women want a chaperone and how to distinguish them from other women.
Additional keywords: anogenital examination, chaperone, genital examination, gynaecologic examination, intimate examination, physical examination.
Acknowledgements
We thank all the clients who completed the questionnaire. We are grateful for the support of the staff of our service, and we particularly thank the administrative clinical staff (T. Jenkin, H. Jennings, A. Rickett, J. Shoebridge) for giving the questionnaire to participants. We thank Professor B. Donovan for general advice and Dr K. Byth for help with statistical analysis.
[1] Fiddes P, Alison S, Fletcher J, Glasier A. Attitudes towards pelvic examination and chaperones: a questionnaire survey of patients and providers. Contraception 2003; 67 313–7.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[2] Ehrenthal DB, Farber NJ, Collier VU, Aboff BM. Chaperone use by residents during pelvic, breast, testicular and rectal exams. J Gen Intern Med 2000; 15 573–6.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6] Torrance CJ, Das R, Allison MC. Use of chaperones in clinics for genitourinary medicine: survey of consultants. BMJ 1999; 319 159–60.
| PubMed |
[7] Rosenthal J, Rymer J, Jones R, Haldane S, Cohen S, Bartholomew J.. Chaperones for intimate examinations: cross sectional survey of attitudes and practices of general practitioners. BMJ 2005; 330 234–5.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[8]
[9] Khan NS, Kirkman R. Intimate examinations: use of chaperones in community-based family planning clinics. BJOG 2000; 107 130–2.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[10] Patton DD, Bodtke S, Horner RD. Patient perceptions of the need for chaperones during pelvic exams. Fam Med 1990; 22 215–8.
| PubMed |
[11] Whitford DL, Karim M, Thompson G. Attitudes of patients towards the use of chaperones in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2001; 51 381–3.
| PubMed |
[12] Price DH, Tracy CS, Upshur RE. Chaperone use during intimate examinations in primary care: postal survey of family physicians. BMC Fam Pract 2005; 6 52.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[13] Maw R, Carne CA, Miller RF. Chaperoning in genitourinary medicine clinics. Int J STD AIDS 2006; 17 27–9.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[14] Stern V. Gynaecological examinations post-Ledward – a private matter. Lancet 2001; 358 1896–8.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[15] Hilden M, Sidenius K, Langhoff-Roos J, Wijma B, Schei B. Women’s experiences of the gynaecologic examination: factors associated with discomfort. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82 1030–6.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[16]
[17]


