
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Sheridan, G. J. 
A1  - So, H. B. 
A1  - Loch, R. J. 
T1  - Improved slope adjustment functions for soil erosion prediction
JF  - Soil Research
JO  - Soil Res.
Y1  - 2003
VL  - 41
IS  - 8
SP  - 1489
EP  - 1508
KW  - interill, interrill, WEPP, USLE, MUSLE, rill, steepness.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1071/SR02029 
N2  - Numerous studies in the last 60 years have investigated the relationship between land slope and soil erosion rates. However, relatively few of these have investigated slope gradient responses: (a) for steep slopes, (b) for specific erosion processes, and (c) as a function of soil properties. Simulated rainfall was applied in the laboratory on 16 soils and 16 overburdens at 100 mm/h to 3 replicates of unconsolidated flume plots 3 m long by 0.8 m wide and 0.15 m deep at slopes of 20, 5, 10, 15, and 30% slope in that order. Sediment delivery at each slope was measured to determine the relationship between slope steepness and erosion rate. Data from this study were evaluated alongside data and existing slope adjustment functions from more than 55 other studies from the literature. Data and the literature strongly support a logistic slope adjustment function of the form S = A + B/[1 + exp (C &#8211; D sin &#952;)] where S is the slope adjustment factor and A, B, C, and D are coefficients that depend on the dominant detachment and transport processes. Average coefficient values when interill-only processes are active are A &#8211;1.50, B 6.51, C 0.94, and D 5.30 (r2 = 0.99). When rill erosion is also potentially active, the average slope response is greater and coefficient values are A &#8211;1.12, B 16.05, C 2.61, and D 8.32 (r2 = 0.93). The interill-only function predicts increases in sediment delivery rates from 5 to 30% slope that are approximately double the predictions based on existing published interill functions. The rill + interill function is similar to a previously reported value. The above relationships represent a mean slope response for all soils, yet the response of individual soils varied substantially from a 2.5-fold to a 50-fold increase over the range of slopes studied. The magnitude of the slope response was found to be inversely related (log&#8211;log linear) to the dispersed silt and clay content of the soil, and 3 slope adjustment equations are proposed that provide a better estimate of slope response when this soil property is known. Evaluation of the slope adjustment equations proposed in this paper using independent datasets showed that the new equations can improve soil erosion predictions. 
ER  -

