
%0 Journal Article
%A Loch, RJ 
%A Foley, JL 
%T Measurement of aggregate breakdown under rain - Comparison with tests of water stability and relationships with field measurements of infiltration
%J Soil Research
%D 1994/08/01
%V 32
%N 4
%P 701-720
%K Soil-Erosion Processes;Splash Detachment;Surface Seals;
%R https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9940701
%U https://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/SR9940701 
%X This paper reports comparisons between aggregate breakdown on wetting by rainfall with breakdown measured by a range of alternative methods. It also reports correlations between measured breakdown and steady infiltration rates of simulated rain of high and low energy, and hydraulic conductivities of surface seal layers formed under high energy rain. A wide range of soils in eastern Australia were studied. Highly significant correlations were found between measurements of aggregate breakdown to < 125 µm caused by rainfall wetting and both steady infiltration rates and hydraulic conductivities. Significant, but poorer correlations were found between steady infiltration rates and breakdown resulting from immersion wetting. Deletion of swelling soils from the data set greatly improved correlations between steady infiltration rates of high energy rain and breakdown measured by both immersion and tension wetting, showing that these methods of wetting ace particularly inappropriate for swelling soils. No correlation was found between infiltration rates and measured clay dispersion. Different relationships between the proportion of particles (%) < 125 µm at the soil surface (P125) and steady infiltration rates of low and high energy rain indicated that compaction of the soil surface layer, rather than increased aggregate breakdown, is a major cause of surface sealing by raindrop impacts. Measurements of fall cone penetration confirmed that drop impacts had compacted the surface layer. Suctions across the surface seal were related to P125 in that layer, and the relationship obtained was used in calculating hydraulic conductivities. The results confirm that measurement of aggregate breakdown under rainfall wetting produces results of much greater relevance to soil behaviour under field conditions than do tests based on immersion and tension wetting. 
