Register      Login
Australian Mammalogy Australian Mammalogy Society
Journal of the Australian Mammal Society
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AM > AM09030
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 32(1)

Movements and habitat selection by wild dogs in eastern Victoria

Alan Robley A D , Andrew Gormley A , David M. Forsyth A , Alan N. Wilton B and Danielle Stephens C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Sustainability and Environment, PO Box 137, Heidelberg, Vic. 3084, Australia.

B School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

C School of Animal Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: alan.robley@dse.vic.gov.au

Australian Mammalogy 32(1) 23-32 https://doi.org/10.1071/AM09030
Submitted: 20 October 2009  Accepted: 26 November 2009   Published: 17 March 2010

Abstract

To investigate movements and habitat selection by wild dogs we attached satellite-linked global positioning system (GPS) units to nine wild dogs (Canis lupus dingo and Canis lupus familiaris) captured in eastern Victoria in summer 2007. Units estimated locations at 30-min intervals for the first six months and then at 480-min intervals for six more months. DNA testing revealed all these wild dogs to be related. Home ranges of males were almost three times larger than those of females (males: 124.3 km2 ± 56.3, n = 4; females: 45.2 km2 ± 17.3, n = 5) and both sexes preferred subalpine grassland, shrub or woodland at the landscape and home-range scales. Wild dogs were recorded more often than expected within 25 m of roads and less often than expected within 25 m of watercourses. Wild dogs displayed higher-velocity movements with shallow turning angles (generally forwards) that connected spatial and temporal clusters comprising slower-velocity, shorter, and sharper turning movements. One wild dog travelled 230 km in 9 days before returning to its home range and another travelled 105 km in 87 days. The home-range sizes reported in this study are much larger than previously reported in south-eastern Australia. This finding, together with previous studies, suggests that the spatial scale at which wild dog management occurs needs to be reconsidered.


Acknowledgements

This project was funded by the Department of Primary Industries and was conducted under the Department of Sustainability and Environment Animal Ethics Committee approval no. 05/016 and the Department of Primary Industries Pest Animal Research/Education Permit RE48. We thank Vaughn Kingston for assistance in coordinating wild dog capture and Geoff Hodges, Jim Benton, Pete Lee, and Alan Sheean for capturing dogs. Comments by Geoff Brown, Lindy Lumsden, Alistair Glenn and two anonymous referees improved this manuscript.


References

Aebischer, N. J. , Robertson, P. A. , and Kenward, R. E. (1993). Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74, 1313–1325.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Corbett L. (1995). ‘The Dingo in Australia and Asia.’ (University of New South Wales Press Ltd: Sydney.)

Corbett, L. , and Newsome, A. E. (1987). The feeding ecology of the dingo. III. Dietary relationships with widely fluctuating prey populations in arid Australia: an hypothesis of alternation of predation. Oecologia 74, 215–227.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Department of Conservation and Environment (1991). ‘VerminPac. Policies for vermin control.’ (Department of Conservation and Environment: Melbourne.)

Department of Sustainability and Environment (2007). ‘Native Vegetation Information for Victoria.’ http://www.dse.vic.gov.au/DSE/nrence.nsf/LinkView/ [Accessed November 2008]

Eldridge S. R. , Shakeshaft B. J. , and Nano T. J. (2002). The impact of wild dog control on cattle, native and introduced herbivores and introduced predators in central Australia. Final report to Bureau of Rural Sciences. Northern Territory Parks and Wildlife Commission, Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia.

Fleming P. , Corbert L. , Harden R. , and Thomson P. (2001). ‘Managing the impact of Dingoes and other Wild Dogs.’ (Bureau of Rural Science: Canberra.)

Glen, A. S. , and Dickman, C. R. (2005). Complex interactions among mammalian carnivores in Australia, and their implications for wildlife management. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 80, 387–401.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Gong W. , Sinden J. , Braysher M. , and Jones R. (2009). ‘The Economic Impacts of Vertebrate Pests in Australia.’ (Invasive Animal Cooperative Research Centre: Canberra.)

Harden, R. (1985). The ecology of the dingo in north-eastern New South Wales. I. Movements and home range. Australian Wildlife Research 12, 25–38.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Hedrick P. W. (2005). ‘Genetics of Populations.’ 3rd edn. (Jones and Bartlett Publishers: Boston.)

Jennrich, R. I. , and Turner, F. B. (1969). Measurement of non-circular home range. Journal of Theoretical Biology 22, 227–237.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Navman Wireless OEM Solutions (2006). ‘Jupiter 31 GPS receiver module data sheet.’ TM30qEQoinYQRhT58SZXMA/LA010811B_J31_DataSheet.pdf [Accessed November 2008]

Neale, J. , and Sacks, B. (2001). Resource utilisation and interspecific relations of sympatric bobcats and coyotes. Oikos 94, 236–249.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | O’Brien M. (Ed.) (2004). ‘Corporate Geospatial Data Library Catalogue.’ 17th edn, January 2004. (Department of Primary Industries & Department of Sustainability and Environment: Melbourne.)

Peakall, R. , and Smouse, P. E. (2006). GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6, 288–295.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Person J. (2005). ‘Writing Your Own GPS Applications: Part 2.’ http://www.developerfusion.co.uk/show/4652/3/ [Accessed November 2008]

Queller, D. C. , and Goodnight, K. F. (1989). Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43, 258–275.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | R Development Core Team (2008). ‘R: A language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna.)

Sacks, B. , Blejwas, K. , and Jaeger, M. (1999). Relative vulnerability of coyotes to removal methods on a northern California ranch. The Journal of Wildlife Management 63, 939–949.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Wilton A. (2001). DNA methods for assessing Dingo purity. In ‘A symposium on the Dingo’. (Eds C. R. Dickman and D. Lunney.) (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales & Southwood Press: Sydney.)

Zar J. H. (1996). ‘Biostatistical Analysis.’ (Prentice Hall: New Jersey, USA.)