CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Australian Mammalogy   
Australian Mammalogy
http://www.australianmammals.org.au/
  The Journal of the Australian Mammal Society
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Structure
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Scope
Submit Article
Author Instructions
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review an Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with CP
blank image
facebook twitter LinkedIn

red arrow Connect with AMS
blank image
facebook

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 35(2)

Examining interactions between dingoes (wild dogs) and mesopredators: the need for caution when interpreting summary data from previously published work

Andrew W. Claridge

Office of Environment and Heritage, Parks and Wildlife Group, Planning and Assessment Team, Metropolitan and Mountains Branch, PO Box 733, Queanbeyan, NSW 2620, Australia, and School of Physical, Environmental and Mathematical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Australian Defence Force Academy, Northcott Drive, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia. Email: andrew.claridge@environment.nsw.gov.au

Australian Mammalogy 35(2) 248-250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AM12026
Submitted: 19 May 2012  Accepted: 22 March 2013   Published: 17 May 2013


 
PDF (89 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
Abstract

Australian Mammalogy has recently published papers by Fleming et al. (2012) and Johnson and Ritchie (2013). While not diametrically opposed, these papers variously question the notion that wild dogs can help suppress and/or regulate the activity and abundance of foxes and feral cats. They examine the evidence, or lack thereof, for support of the hypothesis. In doing so, it is clear from both papers that (1) hard experimental data to support or refute the hypothesis are mostly lacking, and (2) supporting or refuting the hypothesis is largely contingent on analyses and reanalyses of correlative evidence. Johnson and Ritchie (2013) inadvertently misinterpreted the results of a third study but they were not privy to additional information from that work that does not support their view. The main purpose of this paper is to, first, point out that information, and, second, to argue that until further experimental work is conducted, continuing to define the role and relative importance of wild dogs in Australian landscapes and applying that knowledge in a management setting will be difficult.

Additional keywords: Biodiversity conservation, foxes, feral cats, pest animals.


References

Allen, L. (2005). The impact of wild dog predation and wild dog control on beef cattle production. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Zoology, The University of Queensland.

Allen, L., Engeman, R., and Krupa, H. (1996). Evaluation of three relative abundance indices for assessing dingo abundance. Wildlife Research 23, 197–206.
CrossRef |

Arthur, A. D., Catling, P. C., and Reid, A. (2012). Relative influence of habitat structure, species interactions and rainfall on the post-fire population dynamics of ground-dwelling vertebrates. Austral Ecology 37, 958–970.
CrossRef |

Claridge, A. W., Cunningham, R. B., Catling, P. C., and Reid, A. M. (2010). Trends in the activity levels of forest-dwelling vertebrate fauna against a background of intensive baiting for foxes. Forest Ecology and Management 260, 822–832.
CrossRef |

Daniels, M. J., and Corbett, L. K. (2003). Redefining introgressed protected mammals: when is a wildcat a wild cat and a dingo a wild dog? Wildlife Research 30, 213–218.
CrossRef |

Dexter, N., and Murray, A. (2009). The impact of fox control on the relative abundance of forest mammals in East Gippsland, Victoria. Wildlife Research 36, 252–261.
CrossRef |

Eldridge, S.R., Shakeshaft, B.J., and Nano, T.J. (2002). The impact of wild dog control on cattle, native and introduced herbivores and introduced predators in central Australia. Final report to the Bureau of Rural Sciences. Parks and Wildlife Commission of the Northern Territory, Alice Springs.

Engeman, R. M. (2005). Indexing principles and a widely applicable paradigm for indexing animal populations. Wildlife Research 32, 203–210.
CrossRef |

Fleming, P., Corbett, L., Harden, R., and Thomson, P. (2001). ‘Managing the Impacts of Dingoes and other Wild Dogs.’ (Bureau of Rural Science: Canberra.)

Fleming, P. J. S., Allen, B. L., and Ballard, G. A. (2012). Seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in Australia. Australian Mammalogy 34, 119–131.
CrossRef |

Johnson, C. N., and Ritchie, E. (2013). The dingo and biodiversity conservation: a response to Fleming et al. (2012). Australian Mammalogy 35, 8–14.
CrossRef |

Johnson, C. N., and Van der Wal, J. (2009). Evidence that dingoes limit abundance of a mesopredator in eastern Australian forests. Journal of Applied Ecology 46, 641–646.
CrossRef |

Kennedy, M., Phillips, B., Legge, S., Murphy, S., and Faulkner, R. (2012). Do dingoes suppress the activity of cats in northern Australia? Austral Ecology 37, 134–139.
CrossRef |

Letnic, M., Ritchie, E. G., and Dickman, C. R. (2012). Top predators as biodiversity regulators: the dingo Canis lupus dingo as a case study. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 87, 390–413.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Mitchell, B. D., and Banks, P. B. (2005). Do wild dogs exclude foxes? Evidence for competition from dietary and spatial overlaps. Austral Ecology 30, 581–591.
CrossRef |

Moseby, K. E., Neilly, H., Read, J. L., and Crisp, H. (2012). Interactions between a top order predator and exotic mesopredators in the Australian rangelands. International Journal of Ecology , .
CrossRef |

Newsome, A. E., Catling, P. C., and Corbett, L. K. (1983). The feeding ecology of the dingo. II. Dietary and numerical relationships with fluctuating prey populations in southeastern Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology 8, 345–366.
CrossRef |

Pascoe, J. H., Mulley, R. C., Spencer, R., and Chapple, R. (2012). Diet analysis of mammals, raptors and reptiles in a complex predator assemblage in the Blue Mountains, eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology 8, 345–366.

Stephens, D. (2011). The molecular ecology of Australian wild dogs: hybridisation, gene flow and genetic structure at multiple geographic scales. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Western Australia, Perth.

Wheeler, R., and Priddel, D. (2009). The impact of introduced predators on two threatened prey species: a case study from western New South Wales. Ecological Management & Restoration 10, S117–S123.
CrossRef |

Xia, X., and Boonstra, R. (1992). Measuring temporal variation in population density: a critique. American Naturalist 140, 883–892.
CrossRef | CAS | PubMed |


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 
    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2015