CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Australian Journal of Botany   
Australian Journal of Botany
Journal Banner
  Southern Hemisphere Botanical Ecosystems
blank image Search
blank image blank image
blank image
  Advanced Search

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Structure
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Turner Review Series
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Submit Article
Author Instructions
Open Access
Awards and Prizes
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review an Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook twitter LinkedIn

red arrow PrometheusWiki
blank image
Protocols in ecological and environmental plant physiology


Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 19(3)

A comparison of the water use by heath vegetation at Frankston, Victoria, and Dark Island Soak, South Australia

RL Specht and R Jones

Australian Journal of Botany 19(3) 311 - 326
Published: 1971


Empirical water use equations for a perennial evergreen heath community, dominated by a relatively dense and uniform stand of Leptospermum myusinoides, growing on deep sand near Frankston, Victoria, are:

4-6 years after a fire: Eα/Eo = 0.0245(P + S) - 0.441,

7-9 years after a fire: Eα/Eo = 0.0222(P + S) - 0.439,

where Eα is the actual monthly evapotranspiration, Eo the monthly pan evaporation, P the monthly precipitation, and S the total soil water (extractable by oven-drying) stored in 6 metres of sand at the beginning of the month, all values being measured in centimetres. Both P and S contribute to a water store, partly unextractable, but most of it capable of being evaporated and transpired. The intercept on the abscissa indicates soil water normallv unextractable from the water store by the particular plant community -water normally unavailable to plants at values of soil water potential below - 15 bars, plus water potentially available but held in parts of the profile poorly explored by plant roots. Above this intercept the gradient indicates the rate of change of actual evapotranspiration, at any particular value of monthly pan evaporation, per unit change of extractable water (P + S).

The equations were compared with that for a heath community dominated by numerous emergent bushes of Banksia ornata at Dark Island Soak, South Australia:

10-14 years after a fire: Eα/Eo = 0.0433(P + S) - 0.101,

S being the total soil water stored in 2 metres of sand at the beginning of the month.

No runoff and little drainage were observed at either site. Months when drainage was observed were omitted from the calculations.

The gradient of the water use equation for Dark Island Soak is almost double that observed at Frankston. The presence of emergent bushes of Banksia ornata in the Dark Island heath may account for this marked difference. If so, this would explain the apparent ability of tall shrubs and small trees to invade heaths on deep sandy soil in south-eastern Victoria.

The negligible effect of fertilizer on water use by the Frankston heath is reported in an Appendix.

Full text doi:10.1071/BT9710311

© CSIRO 1971

blank image
Subscriber Login

PDF (725 KB) $25
 Export Citation
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help


© CSIRO 1996-2015