CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Emu   
  A Journal of BirdLife Australia
blank image Search
blank image blank image
blank image
  Advanced Search

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Structure
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Rowley Reviews
Virtual Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Submit Article
Author Instructions
Awards and Prizes
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review an Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

red arrow Complete Archive
blank image
With the complete digital archive of Emu now online, we have selected some of the most interesting and significant papers for readers to access freely.

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with BirdLife
blank image
facebook TwitterIcon LinkedIn

red arrow Connect with CP
blank image
facebook twitter logo LinkedIn


Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 97(4)

Vocalisations of the Marbled Frogmouth II: An Assessment of Vocal Individuality as a Potential Census Technique

Darryl N. Jones and Geoffrey C. Smith

Emu 97(4) 296 - 304
Published: 1997


Using recorded vocalisations of Marbled Frog-mouths Podargus ocellatus from southern Queensland, an assessment was undertaken of the extent of vocal individuality and its potential as a census technique. The ‘Kerloo’, an apparently territorial vocalisation, was selected as being most likely to demonstrate individuality. Qualitative comparisons of spectrograms were abandoned due to the inability of workers to distinguish between birds. A detailed quantitative analysis employed 11 measures taken from on-screen spectrograms. Discriminant Function Analyses were able to separate almost all individuals reliably for both males and females. Three variables were of particular importance in the functions derived for both sexes: the duration of the Kerloo; the frequency range; and the number of elements included in a call. The ability of the technique to separate individual birds was high and its applicability to field studies appears possible provided workers are proficient with the analyses and that the behavioural context of the calls is appreciated.

Full text doi:10.1071/MU97043

© Royal Australian Ornithologists Union 1997

blank image
Subscriber Login

PDF (122 KB) $25
 Export Citation
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help


© CSIRO 1996-2015