Register      Login
Journal of Primary Health Care Journal of Primary Health Care Society
Journal of The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Deprescribing in a family health team: a study of chronic proton pump inhibitor use

Kate Walsh 1 4 , Debbie Kwan 2 , Patricia Marr 2 , Christine Papoushek 2 , W. Kirk Lyon 3
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

1 Pharmacist, Toronto Central Community Care Access Centre

2 Pharmacist, Toronto Western Family Health Team

3 Family Physician, Toronto Western Family Health Team

4 Correspondence to: Kate Walsh, 250 Dundas St West, Toronto, ON M5T 2Z6, Canada. Email: katewalsh478@gmail.com

Journal of Primary Health Care 8(2) 164-171 https://doi.org/10.1071/HC15946
Published: 30 June 2016

Journal Compilation © Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners 2016.
This is an open access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are often used inappropriately, without an indication, or for longer durations than recommended. Few tools exist to guide reassessment of their continued use and deprescribing if required. We aimed to reduce inappropriate drug use by developing and implementing a PPI deprescribing tool and process in a family medicine unit.

ASSESSMENT OF PROBLEM: Primary care providers of adults taking a PPI for 8 weeks with an upcoming periodic health examination were reminded to reassess therapy via electronic medical record (EMR) messaging. A PPI Deprescribing Tool was uploaded into the EMR as a second reminder and to guide reassessment and deprescribing where indicated. Ten weeks after the examination a chart review assessed changes to PPI use. A follow up survey of providers assessed the utility and barriers to implementing the Deprescribing Tool.

RESULTS: Forty-three of 46 patients on PPIs (93%) had their PPI reassessed, resulting in 11 patients (26%) having their PPI deprescribed.

Strategies for Improvement: Routine reassessment of long-term medications is often overlooked because of extensive demands on primary care providers’ time. Deprescribing likely improved because potentially eligible patients were identified to the provider and a tool was provided at the time of the encounter to guide the deprescribing process.

LESSONS: Reassessment and deprescribing of PPIs can be supported by implementing a standardised process and use of guidance tools for clinicians. Providers found the timely and selective reminder message to deprescribe the most useful component of the intervention.

KEYWORDS: proton pump inhibitor; deprescribing; reassessment; primary care; medication therapy management; gastroesophageal reflux disease


References

[1]  Top Rx Drugs of 2012. Pharm Pract (Granada) 2013; 37–39 41.

[2]  Kwok CS, Arthur AK, Anibueze CI, . et al. Risk of Clostridium difficile infection with acid supressing drugs and antibiotics: meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107 1011–9.
Risk of Clostridium difficile infection with acid supressing drugs and antibiotics: meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhtVSgtrjE&md5=87ae3b6955dd14ebcde539be8cc866c1CAS | 22525304PubMed |

[3]  Eom CS, Jeon CY, Lim JW, . et al. Use of acid suppressive drugs and risk of pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 2011; 183 310–9.
Use of acid suppressive drugs and risk of pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21173070PubMed |

[4]  Yu EW, Bauer SR, Bain PA, Bauer DC. Proton pump inhibitors and risk of fractures: a meta-analysis of 11 international studies. Am J Med 2011; 124 519–26.
Proton pump inhibitors and risk of fractures: a meta-analysis of 11 international studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXmtl2mtLs%3D&md5=c5a03847bf75f83c88d31cea342e841bCAS | 21605729PubMed |

[5]  Hess MW, Hoenderop JG, Bindels RJ, Drenth JP. Systematic review: hypomagnesaemia induced by proton pump inhibition. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012; 36 405–13.
Systematic review: hypomagnesaemia induced by proton pump inhibition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhsVCis7nE&md5=055f3bd3b7191c8c9a64551ecf6b55dbCAS | 22762246PubMed |

[6]  Sharma VR, Brannon MA, Carloss EA. Effect of omeprazole on oral iron replacement in patients with iron deficiency anemia. South Med J 2004; 97 887–9.
Effect of omeprazole on oral iron replacement in patients with iron deficiency anemia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15455980PubMed |

[7]  Armstrong D, Marshall JK, Chiba N, . et al. Canadian Consensus Conference on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults - Update 2004. Can J Gastroenterol 2005; 19 15–35.
Canadian Consensus Conference on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults - Update 2004.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15685294PubMed |

[8]  Naunton M, Peterson GM, Bleasel MD. Overuse of proton pump inhibitors. J Clin Pharm Ther 2000; 25 333–40.
Overuse of proton pump inhibitors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXktlWrsQ%3D%3D&md5=6ac27198216ba6e2ae6d13a4fcc03951CAS | 11123484PubMed |

[9]  Wong J, Marr P, Kwan D, . et al. Identification of inappropriate medication use in elderly patients with frequent emergency department visits. Can Pharm J 2014; 147 248–56.
Identification of inappropriate medication use in elderly patients with frequent emergency department visits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Gallagher P, O’Mahony D. STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions): application to acutely ill elderly patients and comparison with Beers’ criteria. Age Ageing 2008; 37 673–9.
STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions): application to acutely ill elderly patients and comparison with Beers’ criteria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18829684PubMed |

[11]  Thompson W, Farrell B. Deprescribing: what is it and what does the evidence tell us? Can J Hosp Pharm 2013; 66(3):201–2. [cited 2013 Dec 15] Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3694945&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract

[12]  Bundeff AW, Zaiken K. Impact of clinical pharmacists’ recommendations on a proton pump inhibitor taper protocol in ambulatory care practice. J Manag Care Pharm 2013; 19 325–33.
Impact of clinical pharmacists’ recommendations on a proton pump inhibitor taper protocol in ambulatory care practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23627578PubMed |

[13]  Lucas LM, Gerrity MS, Anderson T. A practice-based approach for converting from proton pump inhibitors to less costly therapy. Eff Clin Pract 2001; 4 263–70.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2Fkt12hsA%3D%3D&md5=d165d620e56a42df02c3ef38a9e3a0dcCAS | 11769299PubMed |

[14]  Murie J, Allen J, Simmonds R, de Wet C. Glad you brought it up: a patient-centred programme to reduce proton-pump inhibitor prescribing in general practice. Qual Prim Care 2012; 20 141–8.
| 22824567PubMed |

[15]  Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Interventions for appropriate prescribing of proton pump inhibitors: a literature review. COMPUS 2007; 1

[16]  Bhatt DL, Scheiman J, Abraham NS, . et al. ACCF/ACG/AHA 2008 Expert Consensus Document on Reducing the Gastrointestinal Risk of Antiplatelet Therapy and NSAID Use: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52 1502–17.
ACCF/ACG/AHA 2008 Expert Consensus Document on Reducing the Gastrointestinal Risk of Antiplatelet Therapy and NSAID Use: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19017521PubMed |

[17]  Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Optimal Therapy Report: Proton Pump Inhibitor Project Overview Summaries. 2007:1(1)

[18]  Kahrilas PJ, Shaheen NJ, Vaezi MF. American Gastroenterological Association Institute Technical Review on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 2008; 135 1392–1413.
American Gastroenterological Association Institute Technical Review on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18801365PubMed |

[19]  Laine L, Jensen DM. Management of patients with ulcer bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107 345–60.
Management of patients with ulcer bleeding.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XjtlGru7w%3D&md5=d4e20caef21af9b102e388b1069cb220CAS | 22310222PubMed |

[20]  Lanza FL, Chan FKL, Quigley EMM., Practice Parameters Commitee of the American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines for prevention of NSAID-related ulcer complications. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104 728–38.
Guidelines for prevention of NSAID-related ulcer complications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19240698PubMed |

[21]  Talley NJ, Vakil N. , Practice Parameters Commitee of the American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines for the management of dyspepsia. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100 2324–37.
Guidelines for the management of dyspepsia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16181387PubMed |

[22]  Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJO, Bradette M, Chiba N, . et al. Evidence-based recommendations for short- and long-term management of uninvestigated dyspepsia in primary care: An update of the Canadian Dyspepsia Working Group (CanDys) clinical management tool. Can J Gastroenterol 2005; 19 285–303.
Evidence-based recommendations for short- and long-term management of uninvestigated dyspepsia in primary care: An update of the Canadian Dyspepsia Working Group (CanDys) clinical management tool.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[23]  AstraZeneca Canada Inc. Nexium Product Monograph August 29; 2013.

[24]  Medical Council of Canada. Periodic Health Examination (PHE) 2013. Available at: http://apps.mcc.ca/Objectives_Online/objectives.pl?lang=english&role=expert&id=74

[25]  Inadomi JM, Jamal R, Murata GH, . et al. Step-down management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 2001; 121 1095–100.
Step-down management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mnkt1Crtg%3D%3D&md5=8a67d96419881b2d92da2005493485b5CAS | 11677201PubMed |