Register      Login
Microbiology Australia Microbiology Australia Society
Microbiology Australia, bringing Microbiologists together
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A decade of RCPAQAP Biosecurity improving testing for biological threats in Australia

Katherine A Lau A C , Torsten Theis A , Alexa M Kaufer A , Joanna L Gray A and William D Rawlinson B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs, Biosecurity Department, Sydney, NSW, Australia

B Serology and Virology Division (SAViD), NSW Health Pathology, SOMS and BABS, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

C Email: Katherine.Lau@rcpaqap.com.au

Microbiology Australia 41(3) 145-149 https://doi.org/10.1071/MA20039
Published: 13 August 2020

Abstract

Biosecurity is a term broadly applied to the protection, control and accountability of biological agents and toxins to minimise the risk of their introduction through natural, unintentional (accidents) or deliberate processes. Biosecurity protection involves the engagement of all stakeholders including government, public health networks, industry, and scientific community. While the Commonwealth Government primarily manages biosecurity, it is also a shared responsibility with State and Territory governments. Rapid, accurate diagnosis is essential to informing all levels of response to biosecurity threats. External quality assurance (EQA) through proficiency testing (PT) is an indispensable tool to allow assessment of laboratory performance. This ensures laboratory capability and capacity are in a constant state of readiness to effectively detect biological threats and reduce the impact and transmission of disease. Since 2009, the Royal College of Pathologists Australasia Quality Assurance Program (RCPAQAP) has been contracted by the Australian Government Department of Health to establish a proficiency testing program (PTP) for the detection of biological threat agents. Starting out as a PTP for the detection of Bacillus anthracis, RCPAQAP Biosecurity has undergone significant transformation, thereby building and enhancing laboratory preparedness. Alterations in the program have been in line with the changing landscape of biosecurity and other emerging infectious diseases across Australia, and worldwide.


References

[1]  Endrullat, C. et al. (2016) Standardization and quality management in next-generation sequencing. Appl. Transl. Genom. 10, 2–9.
Standardization and quality management in next-generation sequencing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27668169PubMed |

[2]  Kozyreva, V.K. et al. (2017) Validation and implementation of clinical laboratory improvements act-compliant whole-genome sequencing in the public health microbiology laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 55, 2502–2520.
Validation and implementation of clinical laboratory improvements act-compliant whole-genome sequencing in the public health microbiology laboratory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28592550PubMed |

[3]  Lau, K.A. et al. (2017) Ebola preparedness: diagnosis improvement using rapid approaches for proficiency testing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 55, 783–790.
Ebola preparedness: diagnosis improvement using rapid approaches for proficiency testing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27974537PubMed |

[4]  Raina MacIntyre, C. et al. (2018) Converging and emerging threats to health security. Environ. Syst. Decis. 38, 198–207.
Converging and emerging threats to health security.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32288980PubMed |

[5]  Hughes, A. (2018) Training and development excellence essentials. HR.COM, Aurora.