Register      Login
Emu Emu Society
Journal of BirdLife Australia
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Song variation and habitat structure in the Golden Bowerbird

F. J. Kroon A B and D. A. Westcott A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems and Rainforest CRC, Tropical Forest Research Centre, PO Box 780, Atherton, Qld 4883, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: frederieke.kroon@csiro.au

Emu 106(4) 263-272 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU05052
Submitted: 5 October 2005  Accepted: 7 September 2006   Published: 19 October 2006

Abstract

Variation is a commonly reported feature of the signals of many animal species. One hypothesis that seeks to explain this variation, the Acoustic Adaptation Hypothesis, suggests that selection should shape the structure of long-distance signals to maximise their transmission through different habitats. One prediction of this hypothesis is that signals will be designed such that within local habitats, local dialects will experience less degradation during transmission than will foreign dialects. We tested this prediction as part of a study of geographical variation in the song of the Golden Bowerbird (Prionodura newtoniana). Our aim was to evaluate the significance of local habitat structure in selection for divergent song in this species. We played both local and foreign dialects at four locations and re-recorded the song at 2 m and 50 m distance from the speaker. Song degraded differentially at the four locations, indicating the existence of different acoustic environments. However, songs that exhibited the least degradation did not originate from the locations that induced the greatest degradation. Most significantly, in local habitats, local dialects suffered similar levels of degradation to foreign dialects. These results suggest that local habitat structure has relatively little effect on the design of acoustic signal in the Golden Bowerbird at the individual level. While efficiency of transmission may influence signal design on evolutionary time-frames, conflicting social and ecological pressures probably act to reduce its importance in ecological time-frames.


Acknowledgments

We thank Matt Bradford for producing the map, and the Wet Tropics Management Authority for the map data. Bronwyn Bayly downloaded numerous recordings of Golden Bowerbirds. C. B. and D. W. Frith, D. Hilbert, D. McJannet, N. Mathevon and one anonymous reviewer read and improved earlier versions of the manuscript. This work was conducted with permission from Queensland’s Department of Environment and Department of Natural Resources, and the Wet Tropics Management Authority.


References

Anderson, M. , and Connor, R. (1985). Northern cardinal song in three forest habitats in eastern Texas. Wilson Bulletin 97, 436–449.
Baptista L. F. (1996). Nature and its nurturing in avian vocal development. In ‘Ecology and Evolution of Acoustical Communication in Birds’. (Eds D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller.) pp. 39–60. (Comstock Publishing Associates: Ithaca, NY.)

Beecher, M. D. , Campbell, S. E. , and Stoddard, P. K. (1994). Correlation of song learning and territory establishment strategies in the song sparrow. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 91, 1450–1454.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Bradbury J., and Vehrencamp S. (1998). ‘Principles of Animal Communication.’ (Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA.)

Catchpole C. K., and Slater P. J. B. (1995). ‘Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Chapuis, C. (1971). Un exemple de l’influence du milieu sur les émissions vocales des Oiseaux: l’évolution des chants en forêt équatoriale. La Terre et la Vie 2, 183–217.
Marshall A. J. (1954). ‘Bower-birds: Their Displays and Breeding Cycles.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)

Martens J. (1996). Vocalizations and speciation in Palearctic birds. In ‘Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds’. (Eds D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller.) pp. 221–240. (Comstock Publishing Associates: Ithaca, NY.)

Mathevon, N. , and Aubin, T. (1997). Reaction to conspecific degraded song by the wren Troglodytes troglodytes: territorial response and choice of song post. Behavioural Processes 39, 77–84.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Specht R. (1999). ‘Avisoft-SASLab Pro for Windows.’ (Berlin.) available at www.avisoft-saslab.com

Statsoft (1999). ‘Statistica for Windows Version 6.0.’ (Statsoft Inc.: Tulsa, OK.)

Thielcke, G. (1973). On the origin of divergence of learned signals (songs) in isolated populations. Ibis 115, 511–516.
Tracey J. (1982). ‘The Vegetation of the Humid Tropical Region of Queensland.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)

Tubaro, P. L. , and Segura, E. T. (1994). Dialect differences in the song of Zonotrichia capensis in the southern pampas – a test of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis. Condor 96, 1084–1088.
Webb L. J., and Tracey J. G. (1981). Australian rainforests: patterns and change. In ‘Ecological Biogeography of Australia’. (Ed. A. Keast.) pp. 606–669. (W. Junk: The Hague, The Netherlands.)

Westcott, D. A. , and Kroon, F. J. (2002). Geographic song variation and its consequences in the Golden Bowerbird. Condor 104, 750–760.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Wiley R. H., and Richards D. G. (1982). Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. In ‘Acoustic Communication in Birds: Production, Perception, and Design Features’. (Eds D. R. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller.) pp. 132–181. (Academic Press: New York.)

Williams, J. M. , and Slater, P. J. B. (1993). Does chaffinch, Fringilla coelebs, song vary with the habitat in which it is sung. Ibis 135, 202–208.
Zar J. H. (1984). ‘Biostatistical Analysis.’ (Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.)