Register      Login
Australian Journal of Botany Australian Journal of Botany Society
Southern hemisphere botanical ecosystems
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Basic chromosome number in Boronia (Rutaceae)—competing hypotheses examined

Fucheng Shan A B , Guijun Yan A and Julie A. Plummer A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Plant Biology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Present address: Innovative Plant Products Group, Department of Agriculture and Food of Western Australia, 3 Baron Hay Court, Perth, WA 6151, Australia. Email: fshan@agric.wa.gov.au

Australian Journal of Botany 54(7) 681-689 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT05050
Submitted: 4 March 2005  Accepted: 18 May 2006   Published: 19 October 2006

Abstract

Rutaceae have attracted considerable attention because of the wide chromosome-number variation. Cytoevolution of the genus Boronia, with n = 7–36, has been controversial. The critical issue is whether the base chromosome number is x = 18 or x = 9 in this genus and in the family Rutaceae. Phylogenetic analysis based on random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers was used to evaluate the hypothesis. Twenty decamer arbitrary primers were used to produce RAPD markers in 25 accessions of 18 Boronia species and a total of 559 DNA fragments was generated. UPGMA distance analysis and Wagner parsimony analysis on the DNA data produced two phylogenetic trees with very similar topology. The two trees generally supported the present classification of Boronia species. The exception was B. tenuis, which may be better treated as a new section or genus. Chromosome numbers of all the genotypes used in the analysis were counted with n = 7, 8, 9, 11, 16–36. Evolutionary distances between species were determined on the basis of branch length of the Wagner cladogram. Regression analysis indicated that Boronia chromosome number has a significant negative relationship with evolutionary distance. Chromosome number in Boronia evolved from higher to lower. The basic chromosome number for Boronia is suggested to be 18.


Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Paul Wilson, taxonomist at the Western Australian Herbarium of the Department of Conservation and Land Management for the identification and confirmation of genotypes in this research, his helpful discussions and access to his unpublished treatment of Boronia for the Flora of Western Australia; Dr Helen Stace of the University of Western Australia for help in the collection of Boronia tenuis from wild stands; Sunglow Flowers Pty Ltd in Western Australia, Bernawarra Gardens in Tasmania and WildTech Nursery Pty Ltd in Victoria for kindly providing some species of Boronia. Fucheng Shan was supported by an International Postgraduate Research Scholarship and a University Postgraduate Award from the University of Western Australia.


References


Ahmad M, McNeil DL (1996) Comparison of crossability, RAPD, SDS–PAGE and morphological markers for revealing genetic relationships within and among Lens species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 93, 788–793.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Armstrong JA (1979) Biotic pollination mechanisms in the Australian flora. New Zealand Journal of Botany 17, 467–508. open url image1

Armstrong JA (1987) Floral syndromes as generic determinants. Australian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 53, 54–59. open url image1

Astarini IA, Yan G, Plummer JA (1999) Interspecific hybridisation of boronias. Australian Journal of Botany 47, 851–864.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bentham G (1863) ‘Flora Australiensis.’ (Lovell Reeve: London)

Caetano-Anolles G, Bassam BJ, Gresshoff PM (1991) DNA amplification fingerprinting using very short arbitrary oligonucleotide primers. Bio/Technology 9, 553–557.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Chase MW, Morton CM, Kallunki JA (1999) Phylogenetic relationships of Rutaceae: a cladistic analysis of the subfamilies using evidence from rbcL and atpB sequence variation. American Journal of Botany 86, 1191–1199.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

da Silva MFDGF, Gottlieb OR, Ehrendorfer F (1988) Chemosystematics of the Rutaceae: suggestions for a more natural taxonomy and evolutionary interpretation of the family. Plant Systematics and Evolution 161, 97–134.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Darlington CD , Wylie AP (1955) ‘Chromosome atlas of flowering plants.’ (George Allen and Unwin: London)

Engler A , Prantl K (1896) ‘Die Naturlichen Pfanzenfamilien.’ (Engelmann: Leipzig, Germany)

Federici CT, Fang DQ, Scora RW, Roose ML (1998) Phylogenetic relationships within the genus Citrus (Rutaceae) and related genera as revealed by RFLP and RAPD analysis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 96, 812–822.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Federov A (1969) ‘Chromosome numbers of flowering plants.’ (Nauk: Leningrad, Russia)

Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Goodwin PH, Annis SL (1991) Rapid identification of genetic variation and pathotype of Leptosphaeria maculans by random amplified polymorphic DNA assay. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 57, 2482–2486.
PubMed |
open url image1

Grant V (1982) Periodicities in the chromosome numbers of the angiosperms. Botanical Gazette 143, 379–389.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Henry RJ (1997) ‘Practical applications of plant molecular biology.’ (Chapman and Hall: London)

Hnatiuk RJ (1990) ‘Census of Australian vascular plants, vol. 11.’ (Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra)

Landry BS, Li RQ, Cheung WY, Granger RL (1994) Phylogeny analysis of 25 apple rootstocks using RAPD markers and tactical gene tagging. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 89, 847–852.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lazaro A, Aguinagalde I (1996) Phylogenetic relationships between the wild taxa of the Brassica oleracea L. group (2n = 18) using random amplified polymorphic DNA assay. Scientia Horticulturae 65, 219–227.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Martin GB, Williams JGK, Tanksley SD (1991) Rapid identification of markers linked to a Pseudomonas resistance gene in tomato by using random primers and near-isogenic lines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 88, 2336–2340.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Millan T, Osuna F, Cobos S, Torres AM, Cubero JI (1996) Using RAPDs to study phylogenetic relationships in Rosa. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 92, 273–277.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Nei M (1987) ‘Molecular evolutionary genetics.’ (Columbia University Press: New York)

Nei M , Kumar S (2000) ‘Molecular evolution and phylogenetics.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK)

Rath P, Rajaseger G, Goh CJ, Kumar PP (1998) Phylogenetic analysis of Dipterocarpus using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Annals of Botany 82, 61–65.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Raven PH (1975) The basis of angiosperm phylogeny: cytology. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 62, 724–764.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Rogers SO, Bendich AJ (1994) Extraction of total cellular DNA from plants, algae and fungi. Plant Molecular Biology Manual D1, 1–8. open url image1

Sambrook J , Fritsch EF , Maniatis T (1989) ‘Molecular cloning: a laboratory mannual.’ (Cold Spring Harbor: New York)

Samec P, Nasinec V (1996) The use of RAPD technique for the identification and classification of Pisum sativum L. genotypes. Euphytica 89, 229–234.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Shan F, Yan G, Plummer JA (2003a) Cytoevolution of Boronia genome revealed by flourescent in situ hybridisation with rDNA probes. Genome 46, 507–513.
Crossref | PubMed |
open url image1

Shan F, Yan G, Plummer JA (2003b) Karyotype evolution in the genus Boronia (Rutaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 142, 309–320.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Shan F, Yan G, Plummer JA (2003c) Meiotic chromosome behaviour and Boronia (Rutaceae) genome reorganization. Australian Journal of Botany 51, 599–607.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Smith-White S (1954) Chromosome numbers in the Boronieae (Rutaceae) and their bearing on the evolutionary development of the tribe in the Australian flora. Australian Journal of Botany 2, 287–303.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Stace HM (1995) Primitive and advanced character states for chromosome number in Gondwanan angiosperm families of Australia, especially Rutaceae and Proteaceae. In ‘Kew chromosome conference IV’. (Eds PE Brandham, MD Bennett) pp. 223–232. (Royal Botanic Gardens: Kew, UK)

Stace HM, Armstrong JA (1992) New chromosome numbers for Rutaceae. Australian Systematic Botany 5, 501–505.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Stace HM, Patrick SJ (1993) Cytological notes in Rutaceae: 1. Boronia tenuis. Nuytsia 9, 131–133. open url image1

Stace HM, Armstrong JA, James SH (1993) Cytoevolutionary patterns in Rutaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 187, 1–28.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sunglow Flowers Pty Ltd (1990) Boronia (Boronia heterophylla). Varieties ‘Moonglow’ and ‘Cameo’. Plant Varieties Journal 3, 25–26. open url image1

Swofford DL (2002) ‘PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), version 4.0b10.’ (Sinaur Associates: Sunderland, MA)

Welsh J, McClelland M (1990) Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Research 18, 7213–7218.
PubMed |
open url image1

Weston PH, Carolin RC, Armstrong JA (1984) A cladistic analysis of Boronia Sm. and Boronella Baill. (Rutaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 32, 187–203.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wilkie SE, Isaac PG, Slater RJ (1993) Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers for genetic analysis in Allium. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86, 497–504.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV (1990) DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Research 18, 6531–6535.
PubMed |
open url image1

Wilson PG (1971) Taxonomic notes on the family Rutaceae, principally of Western Australia. Nuytsia 1, 197–207. open url image1

Wilson PG (1998) New names and new taxa in the genus Boronia (Rutaceae) from Western Australia, with notes on seed characters. Nuytsia 12, 119–154. open url image1

Yan G, Shan F, Plummer JA (2002) Genomic relationships within Boronia (Rutaceae) as revealed by karyotype analysis and RAPD molecular markers. Plant Systematic Evolution 233, 147–161.
Crossref |
open url image1