Register      Login
Australian Journal of Botany Australian Journal of Botany Society
Southern hemisphere botanical ecosystems
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Managing plant populations in fragmented landscapes: restoration or gardening?

Richard J. Hobbs
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

School of Environmental Science, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia. Email: rhobbs@murdoch.edu.au

Australian Journal of Botany 55(3) 371-374 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT06088
Submitted: 24 April 2006  Accepted: 21 August 2006   Published: 18 May 2007

Abstract

Ecosystem fragmentation results in major changes in several environmental and biotic parameters that affect the ability of plant populations to persist. All stages of the plant life cycle may be influenced in either negative or positive ways by the changed biophysical settings caused by fragmentation and associated changes in the surrounding landscape. This may result in plant populations being lost or significantly reduced from patches of native vegetation, leading to the need for active management intervention. This intervention may include management of threatening processes, reversal of ecosystem degradation, or the reintroduction of plants of species that have been lost from an area. These management actions range from preventative management through to active restoration. In the present paper I explore the question of whether there is a limit to the degree of intervention that is desirable in conservation terms, beyond which we are no longer conserving but rather cultivating and gardening, i.e. creating an artificial and potentially unsustainable system. I discuss this question in relation to management of remnant vegetation in urban and agricultural settings and suggest that a careful mix of species-based and process-based management is required for us to succeed in the goal of biodiversity conservation in fragmented landscapes.


Acknowledgements

I thank David Coates and the Symposium Organising Committee for inviting me to participate in the Flora Conservation Symposium in Perth in September 2005. I thank Colin Yates for his ongoing collaboration and insightful analysis of threatened species management, and the many people with whom I have discussed this topic both before and after the symposium. Comments from three anonymous referees greatly improved the draft manuscript.


References


Atkins KA (1998) Threatened flora overview. In ‘Western Australia’s threatened flora’. (Eds A Brown, C Thomson-Dans, N Marchant) pp. 11–14. (Department of Conservation and Land Management: Perth)

Burbidge AA (1996) Essentials of a good recovery plan. In ‘Back from the brink: refining the threatened species recovery process’. (Eds S Stephens, S Maxwell) pp. 55–62. (Surrey Beatty: Sydney)

Clark JA, Hoekstra JM, Boersma PD, Kareiva P (2002) Improving US Endangered Species Act Recovery Plans: key findings and recommendations of the SCB Recovery Plan Project. Conservation Biology 16, 1510–1519.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Clark TW (1996) Appraising threatened species recovery efforts: practical recommendations. In ‘Back from the brink: refining the threatened species recovery process’. (Eds S Stephens, S Maxwell) pp. 1–22. (Surrey Beatty: Sydney)

Coates DJ, Atkins KA (2001) Priority setting and the conservation of Western Australia’s diverse and highly endemic flora. Biological Conservation 97, 251–263.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Cole DN (1996) Ecological manipulation in wilderness—an emerging management dilemma. International Journal of Wilderness 1, 15–19. open url image1

Davies RJ-P (1996) Threatened plant species management in National Parks and Wildlife Act reserves in South Australia. In ‘Back from the brink: refining the threatened species recovery process’. (Eds S Stephens, S Maxwell) pp. 114–118. (Surrey Beatty: Sydney)

Falk DA , Millar CI , Olwell M (Eds) (1996) ‘Restoring diversity: strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC)

Graber DM (1995) Resolute biocentrism: the dilemma of wilderness in national parks. In ‘Reinventing nature? Responses to postmodern deconstruction’. (Eds ME Soulé, G Lease) pp. 123–135. (Island Press: Washington, DC)

Hall M (2005) ‘Earth repair: a transatlantic history of environmental restoration.’ (University of Virginia Press: Charlottesville, VA)

Hobbs RJ (2002) The ecological context: a landscape perspective. In ‘Handbook of ecological restoration. Vol. 1. Principles of restoration’. (Eds MR Perrow, AJ Davy) pp. 22–45. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Hobbs RJ, Kristjanson LJ (2003) Triage: how do we prioritize healthcare for landscapes? Ecological Management and Restoration 4, S39–S45.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hobbs RJ , Lambeck RJ (2002) Landscape management and restoration: new models for integrating science and action. In ‘Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management’. (Eds J Liu, WW Taylor) pp. 412–430. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Hobbs RJ, Yates CJ (2003) Impacts of ecosystem fragmentation on plant populations: generalising the idiosyncratic. Australian Journal of Botany 51, 471–488.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hobbs RJ, Cramer VA, Kristjanson LJ (2003) What happens if we can’t fix it? Triage, palliative care and setting priorities in salinising landscapes. Australian Journal of Botany 51, 647–653.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hopper SD, Gioia P (2004) The Southwest Australian Floristic Region: evolution and conservation of a global hotspot of biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 35, 623–650.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Janzen D (1998) Gardenification of wildland nature and the human footprint. Science 279, 1312–1313.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Landres PB , Brunson MW , Merigliano L , Sydoriak C , Morton S (2000) Naturalness and wildness: The dilemma and irony of managing wilderness. In ‘Wilderness science in a time of change conference – Vol. 5: wilderness ecosystems, threats and management’. (Eds DN Cole, SF McCool, WT Birrie, J O’Loughlin) pp. 377–381. (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: Ogden, UT)

Lawler JL, Campbell SP, Guerry AD, Kolozsvary MB, O’Conner RJ, Seward LCN (2002) The scope and treatment of threats in endangered species recovery plans. Ecological Applications 12, 663–667.
Crossref |
open url image1

McDonald T (2004) The Wilderness Society’s WildCountry Program. Ecological Management and Restoration 5, 87–97.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Possingham HP (2001) ‘The business of biodiversity: applying decision theory principles to nature conservation.’ (Australian Conservation Foundation: Melbourne)

Saunders DA, Curry PJ (1990) The impact of agricultural and pastoral industries on birds in the southern half of Western Australia: past, present and future. Proceedings of the Ecological Society of Australia 16, 303–321. open url image1

Schultz CB, Gerber LR (2002) Are recovery plans improving with practice? Ecological Applications 12, 641–647.
Crossref |
open url image1

Yates CJ, Broadhurst LM (2002) Assessing limitations on population growth in two critically endangered Acacia taxa. Biological Conservation 108, 13–26.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Yates CJ, Ladd PG (2004) Breeding system, pollination and demography in the rare granite endemic shrub Verticordia staminosa ssp. staminosa in south-west Western Australia. Austral Ecology 29, 189–200.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1