Register      Login
Australian Journal of Botany Australian Journal of Botany Society
Southern hemisphere botanical ecosystems
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Floral ontogeny of Swainsona formosa (Fabaceae: Faboideae: Galegeae)

T. Tapingkae A C , A. Taji B and P. Kristiansen B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Chiang Mai Rajabhat University, Chiang Mai 50300, Thailand.

B School of Rural Science and Agriculture, Faculty of Science, The University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: ttapingk@une.edu.au

Australian Journal of Botany 55(6) 643-652 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT06111
Submitted: 5 June 2006  Accepted: 26 February 2007   Published: 27 September 2007

Abstract

Swainsona formosa (G.Don) J.Thompson (Sturt’s desert pea) is used in commercial floriculture for cut flowers and ornamental pot plants; however, accurate identification of the growth stages is critically important in making management decisions in floricultural crops. This plant was investigated by stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to identify flowering time and stages of floral development. This is the first work to describe the complete floral ontogeny in a member of tribe Galegeae. Conversion from vegetative to reproductive stages began within 40–46 days after seed germination for axillary branches and within 46–52 days for central stems. Plants required 807.5 days °C growing degree-days for axillary branches and 921.5 days °C for central stems to reach 50% flowering. The central stem grew more nodes (11.1 ± 0.97 nodes) before the initiation of the first flower than did the axillary branches (7.2 ± 0.93 nodes). The order of floral organ initiation within each whorl is unidirectional, except for the petal whorl, which is simultaneous; the flower is organised into five whorls and shows a pentamerous arrangement of sepals and petals, 10 stamens in two whorls and a central carpel.


Acknowledgements

We thank P. Littlefield of the Electron Microscope Unit for technical assistance and helpful advice with the scanning electron microscopy study, and G. Cluley and M. Faint for their valuable technical help. We are also grateful to Associate Professor N. Prakash and Dr J. Smith for helpful comments on the manuscript.


References


Adkins JA, Dirr MA (2003) Remontant flowering potential of ten Hydrangea macrophylla (Thunb.) Ser. cultivars. HortScience 38, 1337–1340. open url image1

Ash GHB , Blatta DA , Mitchell BA , Davies B , Shaykewich CF , Wilson JL , Raddatz RL (1999) ‘Agricultural climate of Manitoba.’ (Manitoba Agriculture and Food: Winnipeg, MB, Canada)

Auld DL, Murray GA, O’Keeffe LE, Campbell AR, Markarian D (1978) Registration of Melrose field pea (Reg. No. 11). Crop Science 18, 913. open url image1

Bernier G (1988) The control of floral evocation and morphogenesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 39, 175–219.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Blake TJ, Harris RP, Reid DM (1980) Ethylene, gibberellins, auxin and the apical control of branch angle in a conifer, Cupressus arizonica. Planta 148, 64–68.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Boss PK, Bastow RM, Mylne JS, Dean C (2004) Multiple pathways in the decision to flower: enabling, promoting, and resetting. Plant Cell 16, S18–S31.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Carlson JB , Lersten NR (1987) Reproductive morphology. In ‘Soybeans: improvement, production, and uses’. (Ed. JR Wilcox) pp. 95–134. (American Society of Agronomy Inc.: Madison, WI)

Cavins TJ, Dole JM (2001) Photoperiod, juvenility, and high intensity lighting affect flowering and cut stem qualities of Campanula and Lupinus. HortScience 36, 1192–1196. open url image1

Chen JJ, Henny RJ, McConnell DB, Caldwell RD (2003) Gibberellic acid affects growth and flowering of Philodendron ‘Black Cardinal’. Plant Growth Regulation 41, 1–6.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Cline MG (1996) Exogenous auxin effects on lateral bud outgrowth in decapitated shoots. Annals of Botany 78, 255–266.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Coen ES, Meyerowitz EM (1991) The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353, 31–37.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Emery RJN, Longnecker NE, Atkins CA (1998) Branch development in Lupinus angustifolius L. II. Relationship with endogenous ABA, IAA and cytokinins in axillary and main stem buds. Journal of Experimental Botany 49, 555–562.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ferrandiz C, Navarro C, Gomez MD, Canas LA, Beltran JP (1999) Flower development in Pisum sativum: from the war of the whorls to the battle of the common primordia. Developmental Genetics 25, 280–290.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Halevy AH, Kofranek AM (1984) Evaluation of Lisianthus as a new flower crop. HortScience 19, 845–847. open url image1

Herms DA (1998) ‘Understanding and using degree-days.’ (Ohio State University: Columbus, OH)

Islam N, Patil GG, Gislerod HR (2005) Effect of photoperiod and light integral on flowering and growth of Eustoma grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinn. Scientia Horticulturae 103, 441–451.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jacqmard A, Gadisseur I, Bernier G (2003) Cell division and morphological changes in the shoot apex of Arabidopsis thaliana during floral transition. Annals of Botany 91, 571–576.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Jusaitis M (1994) Floral development and breeding system of Swainsona formosa (Leguminosae). HortScience 29, 117–119. open url image1

Lebon G, Duchene E, Brun O, Clement C (2005) Phenology of flowering and starch accumulation in grape (Vitis vinifera L.) cuttings and vines. Annals of Botany 95, 943–948.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Lomax TL , Muday GK , Rubery PH (1995) Auxin transport. In ‘Plant hormones: physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology’. (Ed. PJ Davies) pp. 509–530. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)

McDaniel CN, Hartnett LK, Sangrey KA (1996) Regulation of node number in day-neutral Nicotiana tabacum: a factor in plant size. Plant Journal for Cell and Molecular Biology 9, 55–61. open url image1

Pallez LC, Dole JM, Whipker BE (2002) Production and postproduction studies with potted sunflowers. HortTechnology 12, 206–210. open url image1

Peet M (1996) ‘Sustainable practices for vegetable production in the south.’ (Focus Publishing: Newburyport, MA)

Poethig RS (2003) Phase change and the regulation of developmental timing in plants. Science 301, 334–337.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Prenner G (2004) The asymmetric androecium in Papilionoideae (Leguminosae): definition, occurrence, and possible systematic value. International Journal of Plant Sciences 165, 499–510.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Roberts EH , Summerfield RJ (1987) Measurement and prediciton of flowering in annual crops. In ‘Manipulation of flowering’. (Ed. JG Atherton) pp. 17–50. (Butterworths: London)

Roh M, Lawson R, Meerow A (1992) Flower bud initiation and development of Eucrosia as influenced by bulb storage temperatures. Acta Horticulturae 325, 105–112. open url image1

Schwabe WW (1987) The flowering problem. In ‘Manipulation of flowering’. (Ed. JG Atherton) pp. 3–13. (Butterworths: London)

Schwarz-Sommer Z, Huijser P, Nacken W, Saedler H, Sommer H (1990) Genetic control of flower development by homeotic genes in Antirrhinum majus. Science 250, 931–936.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Sureja AK, Paikaray NK, Srivastava AK (2002) Heat unit requirement of garden pea. Journal of Agrometeorology 4, 199–203. open url image1

Tade E (1992) Anther and ovule culture of Clianthus formosus. Master of Rural Science Thesis, University of New England, Armidale, NSW.

Taji AM, Williams RR (1989) In vitro propagation of Clianthus formosus (Sturt’s desert pea) an Australian native legume. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 16, 61–66.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Tamas IA (1995) Hormonal regulation of apical dominance. In ‘Plant hormones: physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology’. (Ed. PJ Davies) pp. 572–597. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)

Theissen G, Becker A, Di Rosa A, Kanno A, Kim JT, Munster T, Winter KU, Saedler H (2000) A short history of MADS-box genes in plants. Plant Molecular Biology 42, 115–149.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Tucker SC (1989) Overlapping organ initiation and common primordia in flowers of Pisum sativum (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae). American Journal of Botany 76, 714–729.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Tucker SC (2003) Floral development in legumes. Plant Physiology 131, 911–926.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Tucker SC (2006) L.A.S. Johnson review no. 6. Floral ontogeny of Hardenbergia violacea (Fabaceae: Faboideae: Phaseoleae) and taxa of tribes Bossiaeeae and Mirbelieae, with emphasis on presence of pseudoraceme inflorescences. Australian Systematic Botany 19, 193–210.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wareing PF , Phillips IDJ (1978) ‘The control of growth and differentiation in plants.’ (Pergamon Press: Great Britain)

Warner RM, Erwin JE (2003) Effect of photoperiod and daily light integral on flowering of five Hibiscus sp. Scientia Horticulturae 97, 341–351.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Williams RR (1996) Swainsona formosa (Clianthus, Sturt’s desert pea), Family Fabaceae (Leguminosae). In ‘Native Australian plants horticulture and uses’. (Eds K Johnson, M Burchett) pp. 102–117. (University of New South Wales Press: Sydney)

Yan W, Wallace DH (1996) A model of photoperiod × temperature interaction effects on plant development. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 15, 63–96.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Yusuf R , Taji A , Jessop R (2002) The effects of temperature and photoperiod on flowering of Sturt’s desert pea (Swainsona formosa), an Australian native legume. In ‘The importance of plant tissue culture and biotechnology in plant sciences: International Association for Plant Tissue Culture and Biotechnology (The Australian Region) 7th meeting’. (Eds A Taji, R Williams) pp. 369–375. (University of New England Publications Unit: Armidale, NSW)

Zulkarnain Z (2003) Breeding strategies in Sturt’s desert pea, Swainsona formosa (G.Don) J.Thompson, using in vitro and in vivo techniques. PhD Thesis, University of New England, Armidale, NSW.

Zulkarnain Z, Taji A, Prakash N (2002) Chromosome number in Swainsona formosa (Fabaceae). New Zealand Journal of Botany 40, 331–333. open url image1