Register      Login
Australian Journal of Botany Australian Journal of Botany Society
Southern hemisphere botanical ecosystems
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Regreening of involucral leaves of female Leucadendron (Proteaceae) after flowering

M. Schmeisser A B , W. J. Steyn A and G. Jacobs A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Horticultural Science, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa.

B Corresponding author. Email: schmeisser@sun.ac.za

Australian Journal of Botany 58(7) 586-596 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT10129
Submitted: 25 May 2010  Accepted: 26 July 2010   Published: 27 October 2010

Abstract

Involucral leaves of Leucadendron have the remarkable ability to turn yellow upon flowering and regreen naturally as the florets of the inflorescence wilt. This colour change results from degradation of chlorophyll and to a lesser degree carotenoids, resulting in the unmasking of yellow colour. Chlorophyll levels were restored upon regreening. Degreening coincided with the complete dismantling of the thylakoid system, while keeping the outer plastid envelope intact. Regreening resulted from the complete redifferentiation of these gerontoplast-like plastids into functional chloroplasts. The colour change was directly linked to the development of the inflorescence. Complete removal of the inflorescence before flowering prevented the colour change while removal at full bloom, when involucral leaves were yellow, resulted in significantly faster regreening. This designates the inflorescence or florets as the possible origin of the colour change trigger and suggests that the colour change is involved with attraction of pollinators. Degreening and regreening also took place in a growth chamber under continuous high light intensity. Therefore neither pollination nor the presence of roots is required for regreening. It appears that colour change in Leucadendron results from a well-regulated degradation and subsequent synthesis of photosynthetic pigments.


Acknowledgements

The authors thank H. Hettasch at the commercial protea farm Arnelia (Hopefield, South Africa) for providing the trial site and free plant material and Dr S. Midgley for additional reviewing and constructive comments on the first manuscript. The author is indebted to Mohammed Jaffer from the Electron Microscope Unit at the University of Cape Town for support and technical advice. This research was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) under Grant No. GUN: 2069401, the THRIP program of the National Department of Trade and Industry, Protea Producers South Africa (PPSA) and The South African Protea Producers and Exporters Association (SAPPEX). Any opinion, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Research Foundation, the PPSA or SAPPEX.


References


Ben-Jaacov J, Shillo R, Avishai M (1986) Technology for rapid production of flowering pot-plants of Leucadendron discolor E Phillips, S Hutch. Scientia Horticulturae 28, 379–387.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Biran I, Robinson M, Halevy AH (1974) Factors determining petal color of ‘Baccara’ roses. II. Effect of pigment concentration. Journal of Experimental Botany 25, 624–631.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Bond WJ, Maze KE (1999) Survival costs and reproductive benefits of floral display in a sexually dimorphic dioecious shrub, Leucadendron xanthoconus. Evolutionary Ecology 13, 1–18.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Chabot JF, Chabot BF (1975) Developmental and seasonal patterns of mesophyll ultrastructure in Abies balsamea. Canadian Journal of Botany 53, 295–304.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Coggins CW, Lewis LN (1962) Regreening of Valencia orange as influenced by potassium gibberellate. Plant Physiology 37, 625–627.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Dekock M, Theron KI, Swart P, Weiler EW, Bellstedt DU (1994) Cytokinins in the xylem sap of the dioecious fynbos shrub, Leucadendron rubrum Burm F – seasonal fluctuations and their possible interaction with morphological characteristics as expressed in the two sexes. The New Phytologist 127, 749–759.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Devide Z, Ljubesic N (1974) The reversion of chromoplasts to chloroplasts in pumpkin fruits. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenphysiologie 73, 296–306. open url image1

Doorn WG (1997) Effects of pollination on floral attraction and longevity. Journal of Experimental Botany 48, 1615–1622. open url image1

Gonnet JF (1998) Colour effects of co-pigmentation of anthocyanins revisited – 1. A colorimetric definition using the CIELAB scale. Food Chemistry 63, 409–415.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Gonnet JF (1999) Colour effects of co-pigmentation of anthocyanins revisited - 2. A colorimetric look at the solutions of cyanin co-pigmented by rutin using the CIELAB scale. Food Chemistry 66, 387–394.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Gonnet JF (2001) Colour effects of co-pigmentation of anthocyanin revisited – 3. A further description using CIELAB differences and assessment of matched colours using the CMC model. Food Chemistry 75, 473–485.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Grönegress P (1974) Structure of chromoplasts and their conversion to chloroplasts. Journal de Microscopie 19, 183–192. open url image1

Hattingh V, Giliomee JH (1989) Pollination of certain Leucadendron species. South African Journal of Botany 55, 387–393. open url image1

Hemborg AM, Bond WJ (2005) Different rewards in female and male flowers can explain the evolution of sexual dimorphism in plants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London 85, 97–109.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Herrera CM (2005) Post-floral perianth functionality: contribution of persistent sepals to seed development in Helleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae). American Journal of Botany 92, 1486–1491.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ikeda T (1979) Electron microscopic evidence for the reversible transformation of Euonymus plastids. Botanical Magazine-Tokyo 92, 23–30.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Koiwa H, Ikeda T, Yoshida Y (1986) Reversal of chromoplasts to chloroplasts in Buxus leaves. Botanical Magazine-Tokyo 99, 233–240.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Leonhardt KW , Criley RA (1999) Proteaceae floral crops: cultivar development and underexploited uses. In ‘Perspective on new crops and new uses’. (Ed. J Janick) pp. 410–430. (ASHS Press: Alexandria, VA)

Lichtenthaler HK (1987) Chlorophylls and carotenoids – pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods in Enzymology 148, 350–382.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Littlejohn GM, Robyn A (2000) Leucadendron: a multi-purpose crop. Acta Horticulturae 541, 171–174. open url image1

Mayfield SP, Huff A (1986) Accumulation of chlorophyll, chloroplastic proteins, and thylakoid membranes during reversion of chromoplasts to chloroplasts in Citrus sinensis epicarp. Plant Physiology 81, 30–35.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Mcguire RG (1992) Reporting of objective color measurements. HortScience 27, 1254–1255. open url image1

Neeman G, Nesher R (1995) Pollination ecology and the significance of floral color-change in Lupinus pilosus L. (Fabaceae). Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 43, 135–145. open url image1

O’Neill SD (1997) Pollination regulation of flower development. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 48, 547–574.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Pharmawati M, Yan GJ, Finnegan PM (2005) Molecular variation and fingerprinting of Leucadendron cultivars (Proteaceae) by ISSR markers. Annals of Botany 95, 1163–1170.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Prebeg T, Wrischer M, Fulgosi H, Ljubešić N (2008) Ultrastructural characterization of the reversible differentiation of chloroplasts in cucumber fruit. Journal of Plant Biology 51, 122–131.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Rao CV (1967) Morphology of the nectary in Proteaceae. The New Phytologist 66, 99–107.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Rebelo AG , Paterson-Jones C , Page N (1995) ‘SASOL proteas: a field guide to the proteas of southern Africa.’ (Fernwood Press: Vlaeberg)

Reynolds ES (1963) The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. The Journal of Cell Biology 17, 208–212.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Robyn A , Littlejohn GM (2003) Preliminary results of the study of the sexual reproduction biology of Leucadendron. In ‘Proceedings of the Sixth International Protea Research Symposium, Wailua, Maui, Hawaii, USA, 11–14 March 2002’. (Ed. KW Leonhardt) pp. 141–147. (International Society for Horticultural Science: Leuven, Belgium)

Salopek-Sondi B, Magnus V (2007) Developmental studies in the Christmas rose (Helleborus niger L.). International Journal of Plant Developmental Biology 1, 151–159. open url image1

Salopek-Sondi B, Kovač M, Ljubešić N, Magnus V (2000) Fruit initiation in Helleborus niger L. triggers chloroplast formation and photosynthesis in the perianth. Journal of Plant Physiology 157, 357–364.
CAS |
open url image1

Salopek-Sondi B, Kovač M, Prebeg T, Magnus V (2002) Developing fruit direct post-floral morphogenesis in Helleborus niger L. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 1949–1957.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Sitte P (1974) Plastiden-metamorphose und Chromoplasten bei Chrysosplenium. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenphysiologie 73, 243–265. open url image1

Tarkowski P, Tarkowská D, Novák O, Mihaljević S, Magnus V, Strnad M, Salopek-Sondi B (2006) Cytokinins in the perianth, carpels, and developing fruit of Helleborus niger L. Journal of Experimental Botany 57, 2237–2247.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Tavares RM, Morais F, Melo N, Pais MSS (1998) Thylakoid membrane reorganization during Zantedeschia aethiopica spathe regreening: Consequence of the absence of Delta(3)-trans-hexadecenoic acid in photochemical activity. Phytochemistry 47, 979–984.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Thomas H (1997) Tansley review no. 92 chlorophyll: a symptom and a regulator of plastid development. The New Phytologist 136, 163–181.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Tran H, Vu H, Mahunu A, Chien D, Arditti J, Ernst R (1995) Chlorophyll formation in flowers and fruits of Phalaenopsis (Orchidaceae) species and hybrids following pollination. American Journal of Botany 82, 1089–1094.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

van Doorn WG, Woltering EJ (2004) Senescence and programmed cell death: substance or semantics? Journal of Experimental Botany 55, 2147–2153.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Weiss MR (1991) Floral color changes as cues for pollinators. Acta Horticulturae 288, 294–298. open url image1

Williams IJM (1972) ‘A revision of the genus Leucadendron (Proteaceae).’ Contributions from the Bolus Hebarium No. 3. (The Bolus Hebarium, University of Cape Town: South Africa)

Xu SX, Huang QY, Shu QY, Chen C, Vick BA (2009) Reproductive organography of Bougainvillea spectabilis Willd. Scientia Horticulturae 120, 399–405.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Zavaleta-Mancera H, Thomas BJ, Thomas H, Scott IM (1999) Regreening of senescent Nicotiana leaves II. Redifferentiation of plastids. Journal of Experimental Botany 50, 1683–1689.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1