Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Journal of Botany Australian Journal of Botany Society
Southern hemisphere botanical ecosystems
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Water and nutrient availabilities do not affect lignotuber growth and sprouting ability of three eucalypt species of south-eastern Queensland

Judi R. Walters A , Alan P. N. House A B D and David Doley C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Queensland Forestry Research Institute, Fraser Road, Gympie, Qld 4570, Australia.

B Current address: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, 306 Carmody Road, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia.

C Department of Botany, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: alan.house@csiro.au

Australian Journal of Botany 53(3) 251-257 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT04021
Submitted: 1 February 2004  Accepted: 14 December 2004   Published: 26 May 2005

Abstract

Shoot biomass and lignotuber size of seedlings of three eucalypt species, Eucalyptus acmenoides Schauer, E. siderophloia Benth. and Corymbia variegata [syn. E. maculata (F.Muell.) K.D.Hill and L.A.S.Johnson], were measured for glasshouse-grown seedlings established under two water and nutrient regimes. Seedlings were subjected to shoot removal (clipping) at ages from 9 to 19 weeks, and transferred to the high water treatment for a further 8 weeks to assess shoot emergence from lignotubers. Seedling shoot biomass was greater in both the high than the low nutrient and water treatments, but lignotuber diameter was not affected significantly. C. variegata seedlings had the largest lignotuber diameters, followed by E. siderophloia and E. acmenoides, respectively. Although growth of shoots was influenced by nutrient availability, results suggest that species differences in the growth of lignotubers was less affected. It is suggested that lignotuber growth was strongly influenced by genotype. More than 70% of C. variegata seedlings clipped at 9 weeks sprouted, compared with only 5 and 10% of seedlings of E. siderophloia and E. acmenoides, respectively. All C. variegata seedlings sprouted after being clipped at 19 weeks, but <80% of E. siderophloia and <60% of E. acmenoides sprouted when clipped at the same age. It was concluded that seedlings forming part of the regeneration stratum in dry sclerophyll forests need to be protected from damage for at least 4 months (for C. variegata) or at least 6 months (for E. siderophloia and E. acmenoides) if they are to survive by sprouting from lignotubers.


Acknowledgments

This work was conducted while J.R. Walters (nee Buckmaster) was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award at The University of Queensland. The seed used was provided by the DPI Forestry Tree Seed Centre and glasshouse facilities were provided by the Queensland Forest Research Institute, Gympie. The help of the glasshouse manager, Mr Bob Scott, is gratefully acknowledged.


References


Anderson CA, Ladiges PY (1978) A comparison of three populations of Eucalyptus obliqua L’Herit. growing on acid and calcareous soils in southern Victoria. Australian Journal of Botany 26, 93–109. open url image1

Auld TD (1990) The survival of juvenile plants of the resprouting shrub Angophora hispida (Myrtaceae) after a simulated low-intensity fire. Australian Journal of Botany 38, 255–260. open url image1

Beadle NCW (1968) Some aspects of the ecology and physiology of Australian xeromorphic plants. Australian Journal of Science 30, 348–355. open url image1

Bell TL, Pate JS (1996) Growth and fire response of selected Epacridaceae of south-western Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 44, 509–526. open url image1

Brown AG, Eldridge KG, Green JW, Matheson AC (1976) Genetic variation of Eucalyptus obliqua in field trials. New Phytologist 77, 193–203. open url image1

Canadell J, Lopez-Soria L (1998) Lignotuber reserves support regrowth following clipping of two Mediterranean shrubs. Functional Ecology 12, 31–38.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Florence, RG (1996). ‘Ecology and silviculture of eucalypt forests.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Fordyce IR, Eamus D, Duff GA, Williams RJ (1997) The role of seedling age and size in the recovery of Allosyncarpia ternata following fire. Australian Journal of Ecology 22, 262–269. open url image1

Fordyce IR, Eamus D, Duff DG (2000) Episodic seedling growth in Allosyncarpia ternata, a lignotuberous, monsoon rainforest tree in northern Australia. Austral Ecology 25, 25–35.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Forestry Commission of New South Wales (1985). ‘Notes on the silviculture of major NSW forest types. No. 6: spotted gum types.’ (Forestry Commission of New South Wales: Sydney)

Graham AW, Wallwork MA, Sedgley M (1998) Lignotuber bud development in Eucalyptus cinerea (F.Muell. ex Benth). International Journal of Plant Sciences 159, 979–988.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Green JW (1971) Variation in Eucalyptus obliqua L’Herit. New Phytologist 70, 897–909. open url image1

Henry, NB (1961). ‘Complete protection versus prescribed burning in the Maryborough hardwoods.’ Queensland Forestry Service Research Note No. 13.

Henry NB, Florence RG (1966) Establishment and development of regeneration in spotted gum–ironbark forests. Australian Forestry 30, 304–316. open url image1

Ingestad T, Agren GI (1991) The influence of plant nutrition on biomass allocation. Ecological Applications 1, 168–174. open url image1

Jacobs MR (1951) The growth and regeneration of eucalypts. Journal of Australian Institute of Agricultural Sciences 17, 174–183. open url image1

Jahnke RS (1983) Studies on the eucalypt lignotuber. MSc Thesis (The Australian National University: Canberra)

James S (1984) Lignotubers and burls—their structure, function and ecological significance in Mediterranean ecosystems. Botanical Review 50, 225–266. open url image1

Karschon R (1971) Lignotuber occurrence in Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn. and its phylogenetic significance. Flora 160, 495–510. open url image1

Kerr LR (1925) The lignotubers of eucalypt seedlings. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria 37, 79–97. open url image1

Kozlowski, TT ,  and  Pallardy, SG (1997). ‘Physiology of woody plants.’ (Academic Press: New York)

Ladiges PY, Ashton DH (1974) Variation in some central Victorian populations of Eucalyptus viminalis Labill. Australian Journal of Botany 22, 81–102. open url image1

Mullette KJ, Bamber RK (1978) Studies on the lignotubers of Eucalyptus gummifera (Gaertn. and Hochr.) III. Inheritance and chemical composition. Australian Journal of Botany 26, 23–28. open url image1

Neave IA, Florence RG (1998) Moisture stress stimulates the subsequent growth of lignotuberous Eucalyptus maculata seedlings. Australian Forestry 61, 114–119. open url image1

Noble IR (1984) Mortality of lignotuberous seedlings of Eucalyptus species after an intense fire in montane forest. Australian Journal of Ecology 9, 47–50. open url image1

Pryor LD (1957) The inheritance of some characters in Eucalyptus. Proceedlings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 82, 147–155. open url image1

Walters JR, Bell TL, Read S (2005) Intra-specific variation in Eucalyptus obliqua seedlings. Australian Journal of Botany 53, 195–203. open url image1