Waikato GP perspectives on obesity management in general practice: a short report
Kimberley Norman 1 * , Lynne Chepulis 1 , Fiona Campbell 2 , Lisette Burrows 1 , Ross Lawrenson 1 21 Te Huataki Waiora School of Health, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
2 Waikato District Health Board, Private Bag 3200, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
Journal of Primary Health Care 14(2) 146-150 https://doi.org/10.1071/HC22019
Published: 27 May 2022
© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)
Abstract
Introduction: Obesity is a multifaceted clinical and public health issue affecting over 34% of New Zealand adults. The Ministry of Health has positioned general practice as the best-suited location for addressing the health effects of obesity. Previous literature has identified barriers to the delivery of effective obesity management in general practice.
Aim: To explore Waikato GP perspectives to determine areas for improving the care of adults with weight problems.
Methods: A short exploratory questionnaire was used to collect data from 29 GPs across the Waikato region. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used.
Results: The majority of GPs reported: they would wait for their patient to raise the issue of their weight; would offer weight advice themselves as a first option before considering referral; did not view general practice as best suited in tackling the obesity epidemic; and utilised bariatric surgery as a referral option while noting the inequities in access.
Discussion: The survey identified barriers to discussing weight with patients and in finding effective treatment options. Psychosocial and sociocultural aspects were recognised as contributing factors to obesity, but not highlighted as available treatment options. Bariatric surgery was reported as a viable option for treatment, but with barriers to access in the public system. This study found strong trends and themes, which identify an urgent need for further exploration into weight management pathways in New Zealand.
Keywords: general practice, health care, inequity, obesity, opinion, perspective, primary care, weight management.
WHAT GAP THIS FILLS |
What is already known: The rising obesity, and obesity comorbidity rates are causing significant strain on the New Zealand health system. GPs experience barriers to discussing, referring and treating the stigmatised and complex health issue of obesity in their limited time with patients. |
What this study adds: GPs generally only raise the issue of weight management with selected patients and seem to have limited pathways for referral available to them. Two thirds of GPs do not regard general practice as the best location for addressing the obesity epidemic. Weight management is regarded as a shared responsibility requiring input from the Government and wider society as well as focussing on individual needs. GPs expressed that there is access inequity with bariatric surgery predominantly being an option for ‘wealthy’ patients. |
Introduction
Obesity is a significant health issue worldwide, with New Zealand (NZ) ranked the third most obese nation in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).1,2 Obesity prevalence in NZ adults is 34.3%, with indigenous Māori population at 50.8% and Pacific at 71.3%.3 Obesity is a complex health concern, with a myriad of contributing factors, many of which are outside the bounds of general practice.4–7 However, obesity is reversible and preventable through a combination of dietary, exercise, and behavioural changes actioned in culturally appropriate ways.8 The Ministry of Health (MOH) positions primary care and general practice as best-suited to deliver weight management due to their frequent contact with patients and their ability to ‘monitor, assess, manage and maintain’ their patients weight and obesity risk.8
Obesity rates are reportedly rising in recent decades,9 suggesting that potentially the current weight management model is ineffective. Given the known equity gap, finding effective approaches for reducing obesity for Māori and Pacific people should be a priority. Previous literature has highlighted that GPs experience difficulties in the ‘delicate’ discussion of weight, often utilising opportunistic strategies in their practice.10 Barriers experienced included a lack of effective interventions, limited resource availability and obesity stigma.11 Bariatric surgery has mixed reviews, with some GPs expressing the positive life-changing effects it has on some patients through weight loss and reduction of obesity comorbidities. However, other GPs consider this a drastic option that fails to deal with the root cause of the patient’s obesity.11
The current NZ model generally allocates GPs 15 min for a patient consult. Improved pathways to effective weight management are needed to help general practice deal with the obesity epidemic and its associated health impact on their patients, given the limited time and resources they have at their disposal. The aim of this study was to explore GP perspectives of four areas to obesity management in Waikato general practice to help focus on areas for improving the care of adults with weight problems.
Methods
This study utilised a cross-sectional design. A questionnaire consisting of four multi-choice questions, each with a free-text comment box, for participants to elaborate on why they chose their answers, was provided.
Participants
Participants were recruited in one of two ways. First, a short article and electronic link to participate in a Survey Monkey questionnaire was published in the Waikato District Health Board (WDHB) June 2021 newsletter. This was emailed to 494 GPs across the Waikato region and 17 participant responses were collected. Second, paper copies of the same questionnaire were handed out to all (n = 18) GP attendees of a monthly Waikato GP meeting in Hamilton in July 2021, with 12 responses collected. No demographic data were collected.
Survey development
The questionnaire consisted of four questions addressing GPs’ perspective on: deciding to raise weight in a consultation; preferred option to treating obesity; their perspective on whether obesity management is a general practice issue; and their use of bariatric surgery. Due to obesity being such a complex and multi-levelled issue,1 a comments box was included for all questions so participants could elaborate on their experiences for qualitative analysis. This questionnaire was designed in collaboration with the Waikato DHB GP Liaison team. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data,12 and content analysis13 was used for the qualitative comments. Ethical approval was granted by the University of Waikato Human Research Ethics Committee reference (HREC2020#38).
Results
Table 1 details the Survey Questionnaire multiple choice results. Table 2 offers a selection of participant free text comment quotes, which, combined with the other quotes detailed in the sections below, form the findings of this study.
Comment analysis
Question one
The majority of GPs (69%) reported that weight discussion was case dependant and would speak about weight if their patient asked (Table 1). Discussion of weight was reported as a ‘very tricky topic to introduce’ (Participant 16) as there was a high ‘risk of causing offense’ (Participant 07), which was positioned as something to avoid in their role as a GP. A lack of time available in the consultation, the quality of the GP–patient relationship, and how relevant weight was to the presenting health issue were all noted as factors in their decision.
Question two
Although the majority (82.8%) of GPs indicated they would offer weight management themselves (Table 1), many commented that this was case dependant and ‘depends on what patient wants’ (Participant 25) or the patients' ‘needs, finances, [and] motivation’ (Participant 06). Many participants highlighted that offering weight management advice was the first option ‘of many’ used and that referring patients was preferable for obesity management. Nine GPs positioned nurses as a common referral option as they have ‘more time and more resources to offer the patient’ (Participant 12).
Question three
The majority (62.1%) of GPs did not believe tackling the obesity epidemic was their responsibility (Table 1). Obesity was positioned as a ‘multifactorial problem with multifaceted management’ (Participant 18) needs. Although weight management was noted to have a place in general practice, it requires ‘all healthcare professionals’ (Participant 26) and is a ‘shared’ (Participant 29) responsibility. It is ‘a combined effort strategy’ (Participant 14) with patients, general practice, ‘fast food control labelling’ (Participant 29), ‘primary health care and public health’ (Participant 09) and national policy all having a responsibility.
Question four
Most GPs (75.9%) reported referring a participant for bariatric surgery in the last 2 years (Table 1). Perspectives of the effectiveness of this intervention strategy varied. There was a significant theme of ‘caution’ towards the long-term success of the surgery by some participants and that it is ‘good, but needs lifelong commitment’ (Participant 22). With ‘limited availability via public funding’ (Participant 15), the surgery was commonly positioned as ‘largely an option for the wealthy’ (Participant 14), whereby those who could fund the surgery personally or afford health insurance received the surgery.
Discussion
This study contributes new information to the GP perspectives of obesity health care situated in general practice, and thus warrants further exploration. The majority of GPs reported they would wait for their patient to raise the issue of their weight, would offer weight advice themselves as a first option before considering referral, did not view general practice as best suited in tackling the obesity epidemic, and utilised bariatric surgery as a referral option while noting the inequities in access.
Difficulties in discussing weight, options for referral and treatment were identified barriers to effective weight management in general practice, which supports similar studies in NZ.10,11 Psychological and sociocultural factors have been recognised as contributing aspects to obesity development,14–17 yet surprisingly, there was a lack of comments on how addressing these might facilitate discussion, referral or treatment options. One GP (Participant 14) specifically indicated that depression and anxiety would be a barrier to raising the issue of weight with a patient, whereas physiological health concerns such as blood pressure or joint pain were more likely to trigger a discussion. Culturally appropriate health care is crucial for positive health changes, specifically with Māori and Pacific patients; however, this was not highlighted as a utilised referral option by the study participants.18 Referrals to counsellors, psychologists or Māori/Pacific health-care providers are effective obesity treatment options that were not recognised or were overlooked in this survey.
Bariatric surgery was found to be primarily an option for ‘wealthy’ patients, indicating an additional layer to the inequity in access to this effective treatment. Recent literature has highlighted that in one area of NZ, Māori and Pacific populations are less likely to receive bariatric surgery compared with other ethnic groups, despite experiencing higher obesity.19 Although there have been recent discussions about best practice moving forward regarding Māori nutrition,20,21 and identification of ethnic disparities across the board for publicly funded surgery,19,22 there is evidence that obesity is a major health concern for all New Zealanders1,3,23 and that solutions are urgently needed. Those living in socioeconomically deprived areas reportedly are 1.6-fold more likely to be obese in NZ,3 and yet there are financial barriers in accessing this treatment, suggesting an equity issue that needs to be addressed.
This study had a small sample size with no demographic data collected from participants. Although the findings cannot be generalised, the aim was to briefly explore GPs views and identify if more research is warranted in this context. The complex nature of obesity health care was stressed by these GPs. Many barriers are experienced in general practice and from the participants’ perspectives, effective treatment options are limited. Overall, this exploratory study found more guidance seems to be needed in how and when to raise the issue of obesity with patients, and there is a need for a wider and more diverse availability of referral options, a better understanding of the resources needed to achieve effective weight loss and an examination of the inequities apparent in the access to bariatric surgery.
Data availability
Due to the low number of participants from a small geographical region of NZ, the data that supports this study cannot be publicly shared due to ethical and privacy reasons. The data may, however, be shared upon reasonable request to the corresponding author if appropriate.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Declaration of funding
This project was part of a larger PhD project for Kimberley Norman (University of Waikato), which is funded by the Waikato District Health Board Research Trust.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the participants who took part in this study.
References
[1] World Health Organization. Obesity. 2022. Available at https://www.who.int/topics/obesity/en/ [Accessed 24 January 2022][2] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). OECD Obesity Update 2017. Paris, France: OECD; 2017. Available at https://www.oecd.org/health/obesity-update.htm [Accessed 24 January 2022]
[3] Ministry of Health. Obesity statistics. 2021. Available at https://www.health.govt.nz/nz-health-statistics/health-statistics-and-data-sets/obesity-statistics [Accessed 24 January 2022]
[4] Swinburn B, Egger G, Raza F. Dissecting obesogenic environments: the development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity. Prev Med 1999; 29 563–70.
| Dissecting obesogenic environments: the development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10600438PubMed |
[5] World Health Organization. Social Determinants of Health: World Health Organisation. 2022. Available at https://www.who.int/health-topics/social-determinants-of-health#tab=tab_2 [Accessed 24 January 2022]
[6] Howard NJ, Hugo GJ, Taylor AW, et al. Our perception of weight: socioeconomic and sociocultural explanations. Obes Res Clin Pract 2008; 2 125–31.
| Our perception of weight: socioeconomic and sociocultural explanations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Folkvord F. The Psychology of Food Marketing and (Over)eating. London, UK: Routledge; 2019.
[8] Ministry of Health. Clinical Guidelines for Weight Management in New Zealand Adults. 2017. Available at https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/clinical-guidelines-weight-management-new-zealand-adults [Accessed 24 January 2022]
[9] Ministry of Health. Obesity. 2022. Available at https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/diseases-and-conditions/obesity [Accessed 28 February 2022]
[10] Gray L, Stubbe M, Macdonald L, et al. A taboo topic? How General Practitioners talk about overweight and obesity in New Zealand. J Prim Health Care 2018; 10 150–8.
| A taboo topic? How General Practitioners talk about overweight and obesity in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30068470PubMed |
[11] Claridge R, Gray L, Stubbe M, et al. General practitioner opinion of weight management interventions in New Zealand. J Prim Health Care 2014; 6 212–20.
| General practitioner opinion of weight management interventions in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25194248PubMed |
[12] Frey B. Descriptive statistics. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications; 2018. Available at https://methods.sagepub.com/reference/the-sage-encyclopedia-of-educational-research-measurement-and-evaluation/i7064.xml [Accessed 24 January 2022]
[13] Frey B. Content Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications; 2018. Available at https://methods.sagepub.com/reference/the-sage-encyclopedia-of-educational-research-measurement-and-evaluation/i5987.xml [Accessed 24 January 2022]
[14] Ball K, Crawford D, Jeffery R, et al. The role of socio-cultural factors in the obesity epidemic. Obesity epidemiology: from aetiology to public health. New York, USA: Oxford University Press; 2010. vol. 2, pp. 105–18.
[15] British Psychological Society. Psychological perspectives on obesity: addressing policy, practice and research priorities. 2019. Available at https://www.bps.org.uk/news-and-policy/psychological-perspectives-obesity-addressing-policy-practice-and-research [Accessed 24 January 2022]
[16] Zhao G, Ford E, Dhingra S, et al. Depression and anxiety among US adults: associations with body mass index. Int J Obes 2009; 33 257–66.
| Depression and anxiety among US adults: associations with body mass index.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Puhl RM, Himmelstein MS, Pearl RL. Weight stigma as a psychosocial contributor to obesity. Am Psychol 2020; 75 274
| Weight stigma as a psychosocial contributor to obesity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32053000PubMed |
[18] Boulton A, Gifford H, Kauika A, et al. Māori Health Promotion: challenges for best practice. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples 2011; 7 26–39.
| Māori Health Promotion: challenges for best practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Rahiri J-L, Coomarasamy C, MacCormick A, et al. Ethnic disparities in access to publicly funded bariatric surgery in South Auckland, New Zealand. Obes Surg 2020; 30 3459–65.
| Ethnic disparities in access to publicly funded bariatric surgery in South Auckland, New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32328879PubMed |
[20] Hawkins M. Were warriors once low carb? Commentary on New Zealand Māori nutrition and anthropometrics over the last 150 years. J Prim Health Care 2021; 13 106–11.
| Were warriors once low carb? Commentary on New Zealand Māori nutrition and anthropometrics over the last 150 years.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 34620290PubMed |
[21] Hudson B, Pitama S, McBain L, et al. A brief response to Hawkins: a call for socially responsive research in Māori health. J Prim Health Care 2021; 13 204–6.
| A brief response to Hawkins: a call for socially responsive research in Māori health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 34588103PubMed |
[22] Rahiri J-L, Tuhoe J, MacCormick AD, et al. Exploring motivation for bariatric surgery among Indigenous Māori women. Obes Res Clin Pract 2019; 13 486–91.
| Exploring motivation for bariatric surgery among Indigenous Māori women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31591083PubMed |
[23] Hawkins M. Let’s focus on obesity New Zealand! J Prim Health Care 2021; 13 315–6.
| Let’s focus on obesity New Zealand!Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 34937643PubMed |