Salmonella typing in New South Wales: current methods and application of improved epidemiological tools

Qinning Wang; Robert Chiew; Peter Howard; Gwendolyn L. Gilbert

doi:10.1071/NB07036

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Previous Next Contents Vol 19(2)

Salmonella typing in New South Wales: current methods and application of improved epidemiological tools

Qinning Wang ^A , Robert Chiew ^A , Peter Howard ^A and Gwendolyn L. Gilbert ^A ^B

+ Author Affiliations

- Author Affiliations

^A Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead Hospital

^B Corresponding author email: l.gilbert@usyd.edu.au

NSW Public Health Bulletin 19(2) 24-28 https://doi.org/10.1071/NB07036
Published: 28 February 2008

Abstract

Salmonellosis caused by enteropathogens of the genus Salmonella is a major public health concern in Australia. Serotyping is usually performed in enteric reference laboratories for the initial characterisation and differentiation of Salmonella species. Further strain identification within serovars may be achieved by phage typing and this is used as an epidemiological tool for outbreak investigations. Phage typing has limited discriminatory ability and the necessity of sending specimens interstate from NSW for this test causes delays in recognising outbreaks and reduces the likelihood of identifying the source. Multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis has a high discriminatory power and faster turnaround time, and is the method of choice for outbreak investigation. Additionally, a newly developed multiplex PCR-based reverse line blot hybridisation system is able to identify most of the phage types prevalent in NSW. Combining these last two molecular methods will significantly enhance outbreak investigations and surveillance of Salmonella infections in NSW.

References

[1] Davos D. Salmonella. In: CJ McIver, editor. A compendium of laboratory diagnostic methods for common and unusual enteric pathogens: an Australian perspective. Melbourne: Australian Society for Microbiology 2005, pp. 119–35.

[2] McPherson ME, Fielding JE, Telfer B, Stephens N, Combs BG, Rice BA, et al. A multi-jurisdiction outbreak of Salmonella Typhimurium phage type 135 associated with purchasing chicken meat from a supermarket chain. Commun Dis Intell 2006; 30(4): 449–55.
| PubMed |

[3] Stephens N, Sault C, Firestone SM, Lightfoot D, Bell C. Large outbreaks of Salmonella Typhimurium phage type 135 infections associated with the consumption of products containing raw egg in Tasmania. Commun Dis Intell 2007; 31(1): 118–24.
| PubMed |

[4] Vanselow BA, Hornitzky MA, Walker KH, Eamens GJ, Bailey GD, Gill PA, et al. Salmonella and on-farm risk factors in healthy slaughter-age cattle and sheep in eastern Australia. Aust Vet J 2007; 85(12): 498–502.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[5] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Disease Listing: Salmonellosis and Typhoid Fever. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/NCIDOD/DBMD/diseaseinfo/default.htm. Accessed 10 January 2008.

[6] National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Communicable Diseases Australia: Notifications for all Diseases by State & Territory and Year: 1991–2006. Available from: http://www9.health.gov.au/cda/Source/Rpt_2_sel.cfm. Accessed 10 January 2008.

[7] Yohannes K, Dalton C, Halliday K, Unicomb L, Hall G. Salmonellosis in Australia; the societal cost of illness [Master of Applied Epidemiology thesis]. Canberra: Australian National University; 2003.

[8] Maddocks S, Olma T, Chen S. Comparison of CHROMagar Salmonella medium and xylose-lysine-desoxycholate and Salmonella-Shigella agars for isolation of Salmonella strains from stool samples. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40(8): 2999–3003.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[9] William HE. Edwards and Ewing’s identification of enterobacteriaceae. 4th Edition. New York: Elsevier Science, 1986.

[10] Popoff MY, Bockemuhl J, McWhorter-Murlin A. Supplement 1992 (no. 36) to the Kauffmann-White scheme. Res Microbiol 1993; 144(6): 495–8.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[11] Anderson ES, Ward LR, Saxe MJ, de Sa JD. Bacteriophage-typing designations of Salmonela Typhimurium. J Hyg (Lond) 1977; 78(2): 297–300.
| PubMed |

[12] Guerra B, Schrors P, Mendoza MC. Application of PFGE performed with XbaI to an epidemiological and phylogenetic study of Salmonella serotype Typhimurium. Relations between genetic types and phage types. New Microbiol 2000; 23(1): 11–20.
| PubMed |

[13] Hu H, Lan R, Reeves PR. Fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium reveals phage-type-specific markers and potential for microarray typing. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40(9): 3406–15.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[14] Lindstedt BA, Heir E, Vardund T, Kapperud G. Fluorescent amplified-fragment length polymorphism genotyping of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovars and comparison with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38(4): 1623–7.
| PubMed |

[15] Fakhr MK, Nolan LK, Logue CM. Multilocus sequence typing lacks the discriminatory ability of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for typing Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43(5): 2215–9.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[16] Cho S, Boxrud DJ, Bartkus JM, Whittam TS, Saeed M. Multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis of Salmonella Enteritidis isolates from human and non-human sources using a single multiplex PCR. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2007; 275(1): 16–23.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[17] Lindstedt BA, Vardund T, Aas L, Kapperud G. Multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeats analysis of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium using PCR multiplexing and multicolor capillary electrophoresis. J Microbiol Methods 2004; 59(2): 163–72.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[18] Liu Y, Lee MA, Ooi EE, Mavis Y, Tan AL, Quek HH. Molecular typing of Salmonella enterica serovar typhi isolates from various countries in Asia by a multiplex PCR assay on variable-number tandem repeats. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41(9): 4388–94.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[19] Witonski D, Stefanova R, Ranganathan A, Schutze GE, Eisenach KD, Cave MD. Variable-number tandem repeats that are useful in genotyping isolates of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovars Typhimurium and Newport. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44(11): 3849–54.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[20] Gilbert L. Using MLVA to type strains of Salmonella Typhimurium in New South Wales. NSW Pub Health Bull 2008; 19(1–2): 29–31.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[21] Lindstedt BA, Heir E, Gjernes E, Kapperud G. DNA fingerprinting of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium with emphasis on phage type DT104 based on variable number of tandem repeat loci. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41(4): 1469–79.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[22] Mikasova E, Drahovska H, Szemes T, Kuchta T, Karpiskova R, Sasik M, et al. Characterization of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strains of veterinary origin by molecular typing methods. Vet Microbiol 2005; 109(1–2): 113–20.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[23] Ross IL, Heuzenroeder MW. Discrimination within phenotypically closely related definitive types of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium by the multiple amplification of phage locus typing technique. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43(4): 1604–11.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[24] Lan R, Stevenson G, Donohoe K, Ward L, Reeves PR. Molecular markers with potential to replace phage typing for Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J Microbiol Methods 2007; 68(1): 145–56.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |