CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Emu   
Emu
  The Journal of the Royal Australasian Ornithologists´ Union
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Rowley Reviews
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Rowley Reviews

Critical insights to key topics for ornithologists worldwide. More...


 Complete Archive
To celebrate the launch of the complete digital archive of Emu, we have selected some of the most interesting and significant papers for readers to access freely online.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 103(1)

The diet of Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor) at Phillip Island, Victoria, in the absence of a major prey – Pilchard (Sardinops sagax)

André Chiaradia, Ana Costalunga and Knowles Kerry

Emu 103(1) 43 - 48

Abstract

The diet of Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor) was investigated in December 1995 and during the 1996–97 breeding period at Phillip Island, Victoria, Australia. The composition of the diet in this study differed markedly from that reported previously. Pilchard (Sardinops sagax), once a major prey, had virtually disappeared from the diet and Anchovy (Engraulis australis) showed a substantial decrease in frequency of occurrence. Instead, penguins had taken a temporal succession of juveniles of Red Cod (Pseudophycis bachus), Barracouta (Thyrsites atun), and Blue Warehou (Seriolella brama). Little Penguins had lower and higher than average breeding success in the 1995–96 and 1996–97, respectively, suggesting that the absence of Pilchards itself did not necessarily reduce the breeding success of Little Penguins. These findings contrast with those recorded in the 1980s when the absences of Pilchard and Anchovy had a negative impact on the penguins' breeding performance.



Full text doi:10.1071/MU02020

© CSIRO 2003

 
PDF (71 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012