Register      Login
Australian Mammalogy Australian Mammalogy Society
Journal of the Australian Mammal Society
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AM > AM08017
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 32(1)

Gap-crossing in fragmented habitats by mahogany gliders (Petaurus gracilis). Do they cross roads and powerline corridors?

Yumiko Asari A D E , Christopher N. Johnson A , Mark Parsons B and Johan Larson C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia.

B Department of Environment and Resource Management, QPWD Wet Tropics, Ingham, Qld 4850, Australia.

C School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Cairns, Qld 4878, Australia.

D Current address: Iriomote Wildlife Conservation Center, Komi Taketomi-cho Yaeyama-gun Okinawa-ken, 907-1432, Japan.

E Corresponding author. Email: Yumiko_Asari@env.go.jp

Australian Mammalogy 32(1) 10-15 https://doi.org/10.1071/AM08017
Submitted: 28 November 2008  Accepted: 25 November 2009   Published: 17 March 2010

Abstract

The mahogany glider (Petaurus gracilis) is one of the most threatened arboreal mammals in Australia. Although its habitat is affected by fragmentation, gap-crossing behaviour of the species has not been studied. A radio-tracking survey was undertaken on six individuals (three males, three females) in a woodland patch bisected by a 35.8-m-wide highway and a 31.5-m-wide powerline corridor, in north-east Queensland. The mean home ranges of males were 20.1 ± 3.3 ha, 21.3 ± 7.9 ha and 20.9 ± 8.2 ha, as measured by the Minimum Convex Polygon, Kernel and Harmonic Mean methods respectively. The mean home ranges of females were 8.9 ± 0.5 ha, 9.0 ± 4.2 ha and 8.8 ± 2.3 ha, as measured by the Minimum Convex Polygon, Kernel and Harmonic Mean methods respectively. Two males and one female were observed crossing linear gaps. However, there was less crossing than expected, and females were less likely to cross than males. One male used a narrow strip of woodland at the opposite side of the highway as supplemental habitat for foraging. This individual also used scattered trees in a grassland matrix for foraging or denning. Another male used a wooden power pole as a launching site to cross the highway. This study emphasises the importance of protecting large trees along linear barriers in open habitat, and suggests that gliding poles may be used to facilitate gap-crossing by mahogany gliders.


Acknowledgements

This project was funded by the Thorsborne Trust. This research was undertaken under Animal Ethics approvals issued by Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service and also the Animal Ethics Committee of James Cook University. The authors especially thank Dr Jon Luly, Dr Ivan Lawler and Dr Miriam Goosem (all of James Cook University), who provided advice on methods, and also Dr James Moloney (James Cook University) who gave great support with GIS software and maps. We acknowledge all landowners and neighbours who allowed us to conduct research on or near their properties. We give special thanks to all the volunteers who supported the fieldwork. Lastly, we acknowledge all the mahogany gliders that were tracked in this research. We hope this study will assist the recovery of the species.


References

Ball, T. M. , and Goldingay, R. L. (2008). Can wooden poles be used to reconnect habitat for a gliding mammal? Landscape and Urban Planning 87, 140–146.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Bax D. (2006). Karuah Bypass Fauna Crossing Report. THIESS Pty Ltd, Sydney.

Cesarini S. , Taylor A. , Sunnucks P. , and van der Ree R. (2007). Major Roads: a filter to gene flow in the squirrel glider Petaurus norfolcensis. In ‘Ecological Society of Australia, 32nd Annual Conference of the Ecological Society of Australia’. p. 73. (Ecological Society of Australia: Perth.)

Desrochers, A. , and Hannon, S. J. (1997). Gap crossing decisions by forest songbirds during the post-fledging period. Conservation Biology 11, 1204–1210.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | EPA (2001). Mahogany glider recovery plan 2000-2004. Environmental Protection Agency, Brisbane.

EPA (2004). Regional Ecosystems, Queensland Government. Available at: http://www.epa.qld.gov.au/nature_conservation/biodiversity/regional_ecosystems/ (Accessed 28 November 2007).

Fahrig, L. , and Merriam, G. (1985). Habitat patch connectivity and population survival. Ecology 66, 1762–1768.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Goosem M. (2004). Linear infrastructure in the tropical rainforests of far north Queensland: mitigating impacts on fauna of roads and powerline clearings. In ‘Conservation of Australia’s Forest Fauna’. (Ed. D. Lunney.) pp. 418–434. (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales: Sydney.)

Goosem, M. , and Marsh, H. (1997). Fragmentation of a small-mammal community by a powerline corridor through tropical rainforest. Wildlife Research 24, 613–629.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | IUCN (1994). 1994 Categories & Criteria (version 2.3) in IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, IUCN.

IUCN (2008). 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org (Accessed 4 May 2009).

Jackson S. (1998). Foraging ecology, behaviour and management of the mahogany glider Petaurus gracilis. Ph.D. Thesis, James Cook University, Townsville.

Jackson, S. M. (1999). Glide angle in the genus Petaurus and a review of gliding in mammals. Mammal Review 30, 9–30.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Lindenmayer D. (2002). ‘Gliders of Australia: A natural history.’ (UNSW Press: Sydney.)

Mata, C. , Hervas, I. , Herranz, J. , Suárez, F. , and Malo, J. E. (2008). Are motorway wildlife passages worth building? Vertebrate use of road-crossing structures on a Spanish motorway. Journal of Environmental Management 88, 407–415.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | Office of the Queensland Parliamentary Counsel (2004). Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 1994. Queensland Consolidated Regulations, State of Queensland.

Parsons M. , and Latch P. (2007). Recovery plan for the mahogany glider Petaurus gracilis. Report to Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Canberra. Environmental Protection Agency, Brisbane.

Pohlman, C. L. , Turton, S. M. , and Goosem, M. (2007). Edge effects of linear canopy openings on tropical rain forest understorey microclimate. Biotropica 39, 62–71.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | van der Ree R. , Taylor A. , Sunnucks P. , Simmons J. , Cesarini S. , and Harper M. (2005). Quantifying and mitigating the barrier effect of roads and traffic on Australian wildlife. In ‘Road Ecology Center eScholarship Repository’. p. 622. (John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, ICOET 2005: Davis, CA.)

Van Dyck, S. (1993). The taxonomy and distribution of Petaurus gracilis (Marsupialia: Petauridae), with notes on its ecology and conservation status. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 33, 77–122.
Weston N. G. (2003). The provision of canopy bridges to reduce the effects of linear barriers on arboreal mammals in the Wet Tropics of northeastern Queensland. M.Sc. Thesis, James Cook University, Cairns.

Wilson R. F. (2000). The impact of anthropogenic disturbance on four species of arboreal folivorous possums in the rainforest of north eastern Queensland, Australia. Ph.D. Thesis, James Cook University, Cairns.

Yanagawa H. , Asari Y. , Kishida K. , Kimura S. , and Kitasumi T. (2004). Monitoring of Eco-bridge for flying squirrels in Obihiro, Hokkaido. In ‘Wildlife and Traffic. A Symposium on Wildlife and Traffic 2004’. [In Japanese.]