Register      Login
Australian Mammalogy Australian Mammalogy Society
Journal of the Australian Mammal Society
REVIEW

Hybridisation between the dingo, Canis lupus dingo, and the domestic dog, Canis lupus familiaris, in Victoria: a critical review

Evan Jones
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

8 Harrods Court, Strathdale, Vic. 3550, Australia. Email: evan.jones6@bigpond.com

Australian Mammalogy 31(1) 1-7 https://doi.org/10.1071/AM08102
Submitted: 29 February 2008  Accepted: 25 September 2008   Published: 11 March 2009

Abstract

This paper reviews two separate population models proposed for a group of wild canids inhabiting the Victorian eastern highlands and re-analyses some of the data used. The first model was based upon two studies that used eight skull measurements in a canonical variate equation. Those studies classified population samples into three separate groups consisting of dingoes, feral domestic dogs and their hybrids. The second model, based upon a later study, classified a separate and additional population sample on the basis of both coat colour and physical appearance, but also cross-referenced the classifications to their canonical scores. That study rejected the model of three separate canid groups and the ability of the canonical variate equation to differentiate ‘pure’ dingoes from other canids. Instead the population was classified as a single group of dingo-like wild canids with an increased range in the variability of their physical characteristics compared to the original dingo population. After a re-evaluation of the data from the latter study and careful examination of the limitations of the canonical variate equation, the evidence presented here supports the population model of a single group of wild canids. Theoretical considerations associated with these two population models are discussed, as are the limitations of the canonical variate equation to classify the Victorian eastern highlands and other Australian wild canid populations.

Additional keywords: canid taxonomy, Canidae, canonical variate analysis, cross breeds, hybrids, Victorian eastern highlands, wild canids.


Acknowledgements

I thank Dr B. J. Coman for both his support and editorial skills, and Graeme Byrne for statistical comment. Referees gave additional helpful advice.


References

Anon. (1974). Report on the East Gippsland Study Area. Land Conservation Council of Victoria. Government Printer, Melbourne.

Anon. (2007). Final Recommendation on Nomination Number 789, Canis lupus dingo. Scientific Advisory Committee, Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.

Catling, P. C. , Corbett, L. K. , and Newsome, A. E. (1992). Reproduction in captive and wild dingoes (Canis familiaris dingo). Wildlife Research 19, 195–205.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Corbett L. (1995 a). Characteristics and identity. In ‘The Dingo in Australia and Asia’. Ch. 3. pp. 29–48. (University of New South Wales Press: Sydney.)

Corbett L. (1995 b). Social dynamics. In ‘The Dingo in Australia and Asia’. Ch. 6. pp. 80–101. (University of New South Wales Press: Sydney.)

Corbett L. (1995 c). The future of expatriate dingoes. In ‘The Dingo in Australia and Asia’. Ch. 10. pp. 163–178. (University of New South Wales Press: Sydney.)

Corbett L. (2001). The conservation status of the dingo, Canis lupus dingo in Australia, with particular reference to New South Wales: threats to pure dingoes and potential solutions. In ‘A Symposium on the Dingo’. (Eds C. R. Dickman and D. Lunney.) pp. 10–19. Proceedings of the Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales.

Daniels, M. J. , and Corbett, L. (2003). Redefining introgressed protected mammals: when is a wildcat a wild cat and a dingo a wild dog? Wildlife Research 30, 213–218.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Dickman C. R. , and Lunney D. (2001). Last howl of the dingo: the legislative, ecological and practical issues arising from the kill-or-conserve dilemma. In ‘A Symposium on the Dingo’. (Eds C. R. Dickman and D. Lunney.) pp. 95–107. Proceedings Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales.

Elledge, A. E. , Leung, L. K.-P. , Allen, L. R. , Firestone, K. , and Wilton, A. N. (2006). Assessing the taxonomic status of dingoes Canis familiaris dingo for conservation. Mammal Review 36, 142–156.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Wilton A. N. (2001). DNA methods of assessing dingo purity. In ‘A Symposium on the Dingo’. (Eds C. R. Dickman and D. Lunney.) pp. 49–56. Proceedings Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales.

Woodall, P. F. , Pavlov, P. , and Twyford, K. L. (1996). Dingoes in Queensland, Australia: skull dimensions and the identity of wild canids. Wildlife Research 23, 581–587.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |