CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Healthcare Infection   
Healthcare Infection
  Official Journal of the Australian Infection Control Association
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Committee
Contacts
Content
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Call for Papers
Papers In Press
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Guidelines for Authors
Submit Article
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates
For Advertisers

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 New Submission & Review System
This journal is now using ScholarOne Manuscripts as its submission and peer review system. See our Guidelines for Authors for more information about this transition.

 Call for Papers
We are preparing a themed issue. More...

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 12(2)

Healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staph aureus (MRSA) control in Australia and New Zealand - 2007 Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases (ASID) Conference forum convened by Healthcare Infection Control Special Interest Group (HICSIG)

John Ferguson

Australian Infection Control 12(2) 60 - 66

Abstract

A forum on healthcare-associated (HCA) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) control took place at the 2007 Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases (ASID) Conference in Hobart. The aim was to highlight differing rates of MRSA morbidity across Australia and New Zealand and explore the emerging consensus about patient screening and isolation processes.Annual incidence of HCA MRSA bacteraemiae in Australia are much lower in Western Australia (WA) (1.1/100,000 population per year), Tasmania (0.6/100,000), South Australia (SA) (2.4/100,000) and Queensland (3.4/100,000) compared with Australian Capital Territory (ACT) (9.2/100,000), New South Wales (NSW) (6.3-8.7/100,000), Darwin (13.3/100,000) and Victoria (5.4-6.6/100,000). Lowest rates are associated with use of more stringent approaches to MRSA infection control as can be seen in WA and New Zealand.Conference delegates strongly supported the concept of a surveillance system that generates nationally comparable data on HCA S. aureus infections (including MRSA). A possible mechanism would be the adoption of a uniform national indicator for HCA S. aureus bloodstream infection.In terms of infection control management of MRSA, most jurisdictions appear to be moving towards more stringent approaches. Implementation of more active control in NSW and Victoria, the states with the largest burden of MRSA disease, is hindered by resource and logistic considerations and perhaps a lack of unified professional support behind such measures. However, it is likely that better control efforts would reduce patient morbidity significantly and be cost-effective.



Full text doi:10.1071/HI07060

© Australian Infection Control Association 2007

 
PDF (646 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012