Register      Login
Emu Emu Society
Journal of BirdLife Australia
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > MU > MU05040
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 105(3)

Acoustic identification of individual Rufous Bristlebirds, a threatened species with complex song repertoires

Daniel J. Rogers A B and David C. Paton A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Discipline of Environmental Biology, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: daniel.rogers@adelaide.edu.au

Emu 105(3) 203-210 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU05040
Submitted: 17 February 2005  Accepted: 10 August 2005   Published: 12 October 2005

Abstract

Rufous Bristlebirds (Dasyornis broadbenti), possess song repertoires of between 12 and 30 different song-types, only a proportion of which are shared between different individuals. As a result, the comparison of songs among individuals is complicated by the use of multiple song-types. Using both discriminant function analysis (DFA) and spectrographic cross-correlation analysis (SPCC), those song-types that were shared among individuals demonstrated high levels of vocal individuality. DFA correctly classified an average of 98.3 ± 1.2% of male songs, whereas SPCC correctly classified an average of 87.4 ± 2.8% of songs. However, common song features among song-types showed limited value for individual identification. The information provided by the SPCC analyses was then used to discriminate among individuals over a distance of 7.8 km, the results of which supported those of previous studies with regard to the sedentary nature of Bristlebirds. Although the results of the present study show promise, the issue of song comparisons among multiple song-types remains a significant challenge for the development of acoustic identification systems for this species.


Acknowledgments

We thank John Seymour and Barbara Wilson for helpful discussions regarding the biology of the Rufous Bristlebird. Financial support for the project was provided by the Department of Environmental Biology, University of Adelaide, and the RSPCA Australia Alan White Scholarship.


References

Beer C. G. (1970). Individual recognition of voice in the social behavior of birds. In ‘Advances in the Study of Behaviour’. (Eds D. S. Lehrman, R. A. Hinde and E. Shaw.) pp. 27–74. (Academic Press: New York.)

Bretagnolle, V. , Thibault, J.-C. , and Dominici, J.-M. (1994). Field identification of individual ospreys using head marking pattern. The Journal of Wildlife Management 58, 175–178.
Falls J. B. (1982). Individual recognition by sounds in birds. In ‘Acoustic Communication in Birds’. (Eds D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller.) pp. 237–278. (Academic Press: New York.)

Fiske, P. , and Amundsen, T. (1997). Female bluethroats prefer males with symmetric colour bands. Animal Behaviour 54, 81–87.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Garnett S. T., and Crowley G. M. (2000). ‘The Action Plan for Australian Birds 2000.’ (Environment Australia: Canberra.)

Godard, R. , and Wiley, R. H. (1995). Individual recognition of song repertoires in two wood warblers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 37, 119–123.
Miller E. (1988). Collection of yodel calls for individual identification of male common loons. In ‘Papers from the 1987 Conference on Loon Research and Management’. (Ed. P. I. V. Strong.) pp. 44–52. (North American Loon Fund: New Hampshire.)

Mizutani, F. , and Jewell, P. A. (1998). Home-range and movements of leopards (Panthera pardus) on a livestock ranch in Kenya. Journal of Zoology 244, 269–286.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Munn C. A. (1991). Macaw biology and ecotourism, or “when a bird in the bush is worth two in the hand”. In ‘New World Parrots in Crisis: Solutions from Conservation Biology’. (Eds S. R. Beissinger and N. F. R. Snyder.) pp. 47–72. (Smithsonian Institute Press: Washington.)

Naguib, M. (2001). Microgeographic variation, habitat effects and individual signature cues in calls of chiffchaffs Phylloscopus collybita canarensis. Ethology 107, 341–355.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Pennycuick C. J. (1978). Identification using natural markings. In ‘Animal Marking: Recognition Marking of Animals in Research’. (Ed. B. Stonehouse.) pp. 147–159. (University Park Press: Baltimore, MD.)

Portelli, D. J. (2004). The singing behaviour of the Noisy Scrub-bird, Atrichornis clamosus: congeneric comparisons and the feasibility of using individual variation in song as a census tool. Emu 104, 273–281.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Rogers D. J. (2002). Intraspecific variation in the acoustic signals of birds and one species of frog: implications for the acoustic identification of individuals. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Adelaide.

Rogers, D. J. (2003). Geographic song variation within and between populations and subspecies of the Rufous Bristlebird, Dasyornis broadbenti Australian Journal of Zoology 51, 1–14.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Specht R. (1998). ‘Avisoft SASLab Pro.’ (R. Specht: Berlin.)

Specht R. L. (2000). ‘Avisoft-Correlator.’ (Avisoft: Berlin.)

Stoddard, P. K. , Beecher, M. D. , Loesche, P. , and Campbell, S. E. (1992). Memory does not constrain individual recognition in a bird with song repertoires. Behaviour 122, 274–287.


Terry, A. M. R. , and McGregor, P. K. (2002). Census and monitoring based on individually identifiable vocalizations: the role of neural networks. Animal Conservation 5, 103–111.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Terry, A. M. R. , McGregor, P. K. , and Peake, T. M. (2001). A comparison of some techniques used to assess vocal individuality. Bioacoustics 11, 169–188.


Waas, J. R. , and Wordsworth, A. F. (1999). Female zebra finches prefer symmetrically banded males, but only during interactive mate choice tests. Animal Behaviour 57, 1113–1119.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Warner, R. E. , and Etter, S. L. (1983). Reproduction and survival of radio-marked hen ring-necked pheasants in Illinois. The Journal of Wildlife Management 47, 369–375.


Weary, D. M. , Lemon, R. E. , and Perreault, S. (1992). Song repertoires do not hinder neighbor-stranger discrimination. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 31, 441–447.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yasukawa, K. , Bick, E. I. , Wagman, D. W. , and Marler, P. (1982). Playback and speaker-replacement experiments on song-based neighbour, stranger and self discrimination in male red-winged blackbirds. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 10, 211–215.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |