CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Emu   
Emu
http://www.birdlife.org.au
  A Journal of BirdLife Australia
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Rowley Reviews
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review an Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

red arrow Complete Archive
blank image
With the complete digital archive of Emu now online, we have selected some of the most interesting and significant papers for readers to access freely.

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with BirdLife
blank image
facebook TwitterIcon LinkedIn

red arrow Connect with CP
blank image
facebook twitter youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 113(2)

Comparative foraging behaviour of sympatric Humboldt and Magellanic Penguins reveals species-specific and sex-specific strategies

Andrea Raya Rey A H , Klemens Pütz B , Alejandro Simeone C , Luciano Hiriart-Bertrand C F , Ronnie Reyes-Arriagada D G , Victoria Riquelme D and Benno Lüthi E

A Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, CADIC, Bernardo Houssay 200, Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina.
B Antarctic Research Trust, Am Oste-Hamme-Kanal 10, D-27432 Bremervörde, Germany.
C Universidad Andrés Bello, Departamento de Ecología y Biodiversidad, Republica 470, Santiago, Chile.
D Instituto de Zoología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Casilla 567, Valdivia, Chile.
E Antarctic Research Trust (Switzerland), c/o Zoo Zürich, Zürichbergstr. 221, CH-8044 Zürich, Switzerland.
F Present address: Center for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive 0202, San Diego, CA 92093-0202, USA.
G Present address: Centro Universitario Puerto Williams y Parque Etnobotánico Omora, Universidad de Magallanes, Teniente Muñoz 396, Puerto Williams, Chile.
H Corresponding author. Email: arayarey@cadic-conicet.gob.ar

Emu 113(2) 145-153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/MU12040
Submitted: 15 May 2012  Accepted: 14 February 2013   Published: 27 May 2013


 
PDF (479 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
Abstract

How closely related marine organisms mitigate competition for resources while foraging at sea is not well understood, particularly the relative importance of interspecific and intraspecific mitigation strategies. Using location and time–depth data, we investigated species-specific and sex-specific foraging areas and diving behaviour of the closely related Humboldt (Spheniscus humboldti) and Magellanic (S. magellanicus) Penguins breeding in sympatry at Islotes Puñihuil in southern Chile during the chick-rearing period. The average duration of foraging trips was <20 h and did not differ significantly between species or between sexes of each species. Magellanic Penguins made significantly deeper and longer dives than Humboldt Penguins. Males of both species made significantly longer dives than females. Total distance travelled per foraging trip was significantly greater for males than for females, and females made more direct trips (less sinuous) than males. Foraging effort was concentrated in waters up to 15 km to the west and south-west of the colony. The overlap in density contours was lower between species than between sexes within a species. In general, dive characteristics and foraging areas differed more between Magellanic and Humboldt Penguins than between the sexes of each species. In contrast to the findings of studies of flying seabirds, the foraging behaviour of these penguins differs more between species than between sexes.

Additional keywords: Chile, diving, segregation, spatial ecology, Spheniscidae.


References

Bailleul, F., Pinaud, D., Hindell, M., Charrassin, J. B., and Guinet, C. (2008). Assessment of scale-dependent foraging behaviour in Southern Elephant Seals incorporating the vertical dimension: a development of the first passage time method. Journal of Animal Ecology 77, 948–957.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Benhamou, S. (2004). How to reliably estimate the tortuosity of an animal’s path: straightness, sinuosity, or fractal dimension? Journal of Theoretical Biology 229, 209–220.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Bertellotti, M., Tella, J. L., Godoy, J. A., Blanco, G., Forero, M. G., Donázar, J. A., and Ceballos, O. (2002). Determining sex of Magellanic Penguins using molecular techniques and discriminant functions. Waterbirds 25, 479–484.
CrossRef |

Cairns, D. K. (1989). The regulation of seabird colony size: a hinterland model. American Naturalist 134, 141–146.
CrossRef |

Camus, P. A. (2001). Biogeografía marina de Chile continental. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural (Valparaiso, Chile) 74, 587–617.
CrossRef |

Catry, P., Phillips, R. A., and Croxall, J. P. (2005). Sexual segregation in birds: patterns, processes and implications for conservation. In ‘Sexual Segregation: Ecology of the Two Sexes’. (Eds K. E. Ruckstuhl and P. Neuhaus.) pp. 351–378. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Clarke, J., Manly, B., Kerry, K., Gardner, H., Franchi, E., Corsolini, S., and Focardi, S. (1998). Sex differences in Adélie Penguin foraging strategies. Polar Biology 20, 248–258.
CrossRef |

Cook, T. R., Cherel, Y., Bost, C. A., and Tremblay, Y. (2007). Chick-rearing Crozet Shags (Phalacrocorax melanogenis) display sex-specific foraging behaviour. Antarctic Science 19, 55–63.
CrossRef |

Croxall, J. P., and Prince, P. A. (1980). Food, feeding ecology and ecological segregation of seabirds at South Georgia. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 14, 103–131.
CrossRef |

Dehnhard, N., Voigt, C. C., Poisbleau, M., Demongin, L., and Quillfeldt, P. (2011). Stable isotopes in Southern Rockhopper Penguins: foraging areas and sexual differences in the non-breeding period. Polar Biology 34, 1763–1773.
CrossRef |

Duffy, D. C. (1987). Three thousand kilometres of Chilean penguins. Explorers Journal 65, 106–109.

Escribano, R., Fernández, M., and Aranís, A. (2003). Physical-chemical processes and patterns of diversity of the Chilean eastern boundary pelagic and benthic marine ecosystems: an overview. Gayana Zoologica 67, 190–205.

Fairbairn, J., and Shine, R. (1993). Patterns of sexual size dimorphism in seabirds of the southern hemisphere. Oikos 68, 139–145.
CrossRef |

Falabella, V., Campagna, C., and Croxall, J. (2009). ‘Atlas del Mar Patagónico: Especies y Espacios.’ (Wildlife Conservation Society, Argentina, and BirdLife International: Buenos Aires.) Available at http://www.atlas-marpatagonico.org [Verified 26 March 2013].

Gause, G. F. (1934). ‘The Struggle for Existence.’ (Williams and Wilkins: Baltimore, MD.)

Gilardi, J. D. (1992). Sex-specific foraging distributions of Brown Boobies in the eastern tropical Pacific. Colonial Waterbirds 15, 148–151.
CrossRef |

González-Solís, J., Croxall, J. P., and Wood, A. G. (2000). Foraging partitioning between giant petrels Macronectes spp. and its relationship with breeding population changes at Bird Island, South Georgia. Marine Ecology Progress Series 204, 279–288.
CrossRef |

González-Solís, J., Croxall, J. P., and Afanasyev, V. (2007). Offshore spatial segregation in giant petrels Macronectes spp.: differences between species, sexes and seasons. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 17, S22–S36.
CrossRef |

Halsey, L. G., Butler, P. J., and Blackburn, T. M. (2006). A phylogenetic analysis of the allometry of diving. American Naturalist 167, 276–287.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Hemson, G., Johnson, P., South, A., Kenward, R., Ripley, R., and Macdonald, D. (2005). Are kernels the mustard? Data from global positioning system (GPS) collars suggests problems for kernel home-range analyses with least-squares cross-validation. Journal of Animal Ecology 74, 455–463.
CrossRef |

Hennicke, J. C., and Culik, B. M. (2005). Foraging performance and reproductive success of Humboldt Penguins in relation to prey availability. Marine Ecology Progress Series 296, 173–181.
CrossRef |

Herling, C., Culik, B. M., and Hennicke, J. C. (2005). Diet of the Humboldt Penguin (Spheniscus humboldti) in northern and southern Chile. Marine Biology 147, 13–25.
CrossRef |

Hiriart-Bertrand, L., Simeone, A., Reyes-Arriagada, R., Riquelme, V., Pütz, K., and Luthi, B. (2010). Description of a mixed-species colony of Humboldt (Spheniscus humboldti) and Magellanic Penguin (S. magellanicus) at Metalqui Island, Chiloe, southern Chile. Boletin Chileno de Ornitología 16, 42–47.

Horning, M., and Trillmich, F. (1997). Ontogeny of diving behaviour in the Galapagos Fur Seal. Behaviour 134, 1211–1257.
CrossRef |

Hull, C. L. (1999). The foraging zones of breeding Royal (Eudyptes schlegeli) and Rockhopper (E. chrysocome) Penguins: an assessment of techniques and species comparison. Wildlife Research 26, 789–803.
CrossRef |

Hull, C. L. (2000). Comparative diving behaviour and segregation of the marine habitat by breeding Royal Penguins, Eudyptes schlegeli, and Eastern Rockhopper Penguins, Eudyptes chrysocome filholi, at Macquarie Island. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78, 333–345.

Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54, 187–211.
CrossRef |

Hutchinson, G. E. (1959). Homage to Santa Rosalia, or why are there so many different kinds of animals? American Naturalist 93, 145–159.
CrossRef |

Hutchinson, G. E. (1978). ‘An Introduction to Population Ecology.’ (Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.)

Kokubun, N., Takahashi, A., Mori, Y., Watanabe, S., and Shin, H. C. (2010). Comparison of diving behaviour and foraging habitat use between Chinstrap and Gentoo Penguins breeding in the South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Marine Biology 157, 811–825.
CrossRef |

Lack, D. (1971). ‘Ecological Isolation in Birds.’ (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.)

Lalli, C. M., and Parsons, T. R. (1997). ‘Biological Oceanography: An Introduction.’ 2nd edn. (Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK.)

Lynnes, A. S., Reid, K., Croxall, J. P., and Trathan, P. N. (2002). Conflict or co-existence? Foraging distribution and competition for prey between Adélie and Chinstrap Penguins. Marine Biology 141, 1165–1174.
CrossRef |

MacArthur, R. H. (1958). Population ecology of some warblers of northeastern coniferous forests. Ecology 39, 599–619.
CrossRef |

Masello, J. F., Mundry, R., Poisbleau, M., Demongin, L., Voigt, C. C., Wikelski, M., and Quillfeldt, P. (2010). Diving seabirds share foraging space and time within and among species. Ecosphere 1, art19.
CrossRef |

McDonald, R. A. (2002). Resource partitioning among British and Irish mustelids. Journal of Animal Ecology 71, 185–200.
CrossRef |

Mori, Y., and Boyd, I. L. (2004). Segregation of foraging between two sympatric penguin species: does rate maximisation make the difference? Marine Ecology Progress Series 275, 241–249.
CrossRef |

Paredes, R., Jones, I. L., Bonnes, D. J., Tremblay, Y., and Renner, M. (2008). Sex-specific differences in diving behaviour of two sympatric Alcini species: Thick-billed Murres and Razorbills. Canadian Journal of Zoology 86, 610–622.
CrossRef |

Petersen, S. L., Ryan, P. G., and Gremillet, D. (2006). Is food availability limiting African Penguins Spheniscus demersus at Boulders? A comparison of foraging efforts at mainland and island colonies. Ibis 148, 14–26.
CrossRef |

Phillips, R. A., Silk, J. R. D., Phalan, B., Catry, P., and Croxall, J. P. (2004). Seasonal sexual segregation in two Thalassarche albatross species: competitive exclusion, reproductive role specialization or foraging niche divergence? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 271, 1283–1291.
CrossRef | CAS |

Pütz, K., Raya Rey, A., Huin, N., Schiavini, A., Pütz, A., and Luthi, B. (2006). Diving characteristics of Southern Rockhopper Penguins (Eudyptes c. chrysocome) in the southwest Atlantic. Marine Biology 149, 125–137.
CrossRef |

Pütz, K., Hiriart-Bertrand, L., Simeone, A., Riquelme, V., Reyes-Arriagada, R., and Lüthi, B. (2011). Entanglement and drowning of a Magellanic Penguin (Spheniscus magellanicus) in a gill net recorded by a time-depth recorder in southern Chile. Waterbirds 34, 121–125.
CrossRef |

Quillfeldt, P., Schroff, S., van Noordwijk, H. J., Michalik, A., Ludynia, K., and Masello, J. F. (2011). Flexible foraging behaviour of a sexually dimorphic seabird: large males do not always dive deep. Marine Ecology Progress Series 428, 271–287.
CrossRef |

Quintana, F., Wilson, R., Dell’Arciprete, P., Shepard, E., and Gómez Laich, A. (2011). Women from Venus, men from Mars: inter-sex foraging differences in the Imperial Cormorant, Phalacrocorax atriceps, a colonial seabird. Oikos 120, 350–358.
CrossRef |

R Development Core Team (2010). R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria.) Available at http://www.R-project.org [Verified 7 April 2013].

Raya Rey, A., Bost, C. A., Schiavini, A., and Pütz, K. (2010). Foraging movements of Magellanic Penguins Spheniscus magellanicus in the Beagle Channel, Argentina, related to tide and tidal currents. Journal of Ornithology 151, 933–943.
CrossRef |

Raya Rey, A., Pütz, K., Scioscia, G., Lüthi, B., and Schiavini, A. (2012). Sexual differences in the foraging behaviour of Magellanic Penguins related to stage of breeding. Emu 112, 90–96.
CrossRef |

Roberts, J. J., Best, B. D., Dunn, D. C., Treml, E. A., and Halpin, P. N. (2010). Marine Geospatial Ecology Tools: an integrated framework for ecological geoprocessing with ArcGIS, Python, R, MATLAB, and C++. Environmental Modelling & Software 25, 1197–1207.
CrossRef |

Ryan, P. G., Petersen, S. L., Peters, G., and Gremillet, D. (2004). Field testing GPS loggers on marine predators: effects of precision, resolution and sampling rate on foraging tracks of African Penguins. Marine Biology 145, 215–223.
CrossRef |

Schiavini, A., and Raya Rey, A. (2004). Long days, long trips: foraging ecology of female Rockhopper Penguins Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome at Tierra del Fuego. Marine Ecology Progress Series 275, 251–262.
CrossRef |

Schoener, T. W. (1983). Field experiments on interspecific competition. American Naturalist 122, 240–285.
CrossRef |

Schreer, J. F., Kovacs, K. M., and O’Hara Hines, R. J. (2001). Comparative diving patterns of pinnipeds and seabirds. Ecological Monographs 71, 137–162.
CrossRef |

Scolaro, J. A., Hall, M. A., and Ximénez, I. M. (1983). The Magellanic Penguin (Spheniscus magellanicus): sexing adults by discrminant analysis of morphometric characters. Auk 100, 221–224.

Simeone, A. (2004). Evaluación de la población reproductiva del Pingüino de Magallanes y del Pingüino de Humboldt en los Islotes Puñihuil, Chiloé. Informe final. Estudio financiado por la Fundación Otway (Chile) y Zoo Landau in der Pfalz (Alemania), Viña del Mar, Chile.

Simeone, A., and Hucke-Gaete, R. (1997). Presencia de Pingüino de Humboldt (Spheniscus humboldti) en Isla Metalqui, Parque Nacional Chiloé, sur de Chile. Boletín Chileno de Ornitología 4, 34–36.

Simeone, A., Hiriart-Bertrand, L., Reyes-Arriaga, R., Halpern, M., Dubach, J., Wallace, R., Pütz, K., and Lüthi, B. (2009). Heterospecific pairing and hybridization between wild Humboldt and Magellanic Penguins in southern Chile. Condor 111, 544–550.
CrossRef |

Thiebot, J. B., Cherel, Y., Trathan, P. N., and Bost, C. A. (2012). Coexistence of oceanic predators on wintering areas explained by population-scale foraging segregation in space or time. Ecology 93, 122–130.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Tremblay, Y., and Cherel, Y. (2000). Benthic and pelagic dives: a new foraging behaviour in Rockhopper Penguins. Marine Ecology Progress Series 204, 257–267.
CrossRef |

Volkman, N. J., Presler, P., and Trivelpiece, W. Z. (1980). Diets of pygoscelid penguins at King George Island, Antarctica. Condor 82, 373–378.
CrossRef |

Wallace, R. S., Dubach, J., Michaels, M. G., Kenker, N. S., Diebold, E. D., Grzybowski, K., Teare, J. A., and Willis, M. J. (2008). Morphometric determination of gender in adult Humboldt Penguins (Spheniscus humboldti). Waterbirds 31, 448–453.
CrossRef |

Weimerskirch, H., Shaffer, S. A., Tremblay, Y., Costa, D. P., Gadenne, H., Kato, A., Ropert-Coudert, Y., Sato, K., and Aurioles, D. (2009). Species- and sex-specific differences in foraging behaviour and foraging zones in Blue-footed and Brown Boobies in the Gulf of California. Marine Ecology Progress Series 391, 267–278.
CrossRef |

Williams, T. D. (1995). ‘The Penguins.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)

Wilson, R. P. (2010). Resource partitioning and niche hyper-volume overlap in free-living pygoscelid penguins. Functional Ecology 24, 646–657.
CrossRef |

Wilson, R. P., Duffy, D. C., Wilson, M. P., and Araya, B. (1995). Aspects of the ecology of species replacement in Humboldt and Magellanic Penguins in Chile. Le Gerfaut 85, 49–61.

Wilson, R. P., Pütz, K., Peters, G., Culik, B., Scolaro, J. A., Charrassin, J. B., and Ropert-Coudert, Y. (1997). Long-term attachment of transmitting and recording devices to penguins and other seabirds. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25, 101–106.

Wood, A. G., Naef-Daenzer, B., Prince, P. A., and Croxall, J. P. (2000). Quantifying habitat use in satellite-tracked pelagic seabirds: application of kernel estimation to albatross locations. Journal of Avian Biology 31, 278–286.
CrossRef |

Ydenberg, R. C., and Clark, C. W. (1989). Aerobiosis and anaerobiosis during diving by Western Grebes: an optimal foraging approach. Journal of Theoretical Biology 139, 437–447.
CrossRef |

Zavalaga, C. B., and Paredes, R. (1997). Sex determination of adult Humboldt Penguins using morphometric characters. Journal of Field Ornithology 68, 102–112.

Zollner, P. A., and Lima, S. L. (1999). Search strategies for landscape-level interpatch movements. Ecology 80, 1019–1030.
CrossRef |


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 
    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2014