Articles citing this paper
Ether and Relativity
G Builder
11(3) pp.279 - 297
39 articles found in Crossref database.
Covariant Electrodynamics of Conducting Media
Wilhelm Horst E.
Fusion Technology. 1984 6(2P1). p.174
A misunderstood rebellion
Chang Hasok
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 1993 24(5). p.741
Cosmology versus relativity?The reference frame paradox
Prokhovnik S. J.
Foundations of Physics. 1973 3(3). p.351
Cosmological lore?and some heresies
Prokhovnik S. J.
Foundations of Physics. 1976 6(6). p.687
Critique of some statements in the theory of relativity
Podlaha M. F.
Il Nuovo Cimento B Series 11. 1981 66(1). p.9
Neutrino structure of the ether
Ruderfer M.
Lettere al Nuovo Cimento. 1975 13(1). p.9
Review of the application of Newton's third law in physics
Cornille Patrick
Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 1999 25(2). p.161
The twin paradoxes of special relativity: Their resolution and implications
Prkhovnik S. J.
Foundations of Physics. 1989 19(5). p.541
Continuum dynamics and the electromagnetic field in the scalar ether theory of gravitation
Arminjon Mayeul
Open Physics. 2016 14(1). p.395
The hidden physical model of kinematics under SRT’s observer-centric models
Percival J N
Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2022 2197(1). p.012022
New experimental test of Lorentz’s theory of relativity
Sherwin Chalmers W.
Physical Review A. 1987 35(9). p.3650
Some Recent Experimental Tests of the "Clock Paradox"
Sherwin C. W.
Physical Review. 1960 120(1). p.17
Time and the Metaphysics of Relativity (2001)
The empty ghosts of Michelson and Morley: A critique of the Marinov coupled-mirrors experiment
Prokhovnik S. J.
Foundations of Physics. 1979 9(11-12). p.883
DID EINSTEIN'S PROGRAMME SUPERSEDE LORENTZ'S?
PROKHOVNIK S. J.
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 1974 25(4). p.336
New non-zero photon mass interpretation of the Sagnac effect as direct experimental justification of the Langevin paradox
Vigier J.P.
Physics Letters A. 1997 234(2). p.75
The Tenseless Theory of Time (2000)
Time and the Metaphysics of Relativity (2001)
The operation of the relativistic Doppler effect
Prokhovnik S. J.
Foundations of Physics. 1980 10(3-4). p.197
A note concerning the possible equivalence of Einstein’s and Lorentz’s theories
Tuohimaa H.
Lettere Al Nuovo Cimento Series 2. 1978 21(16). p.572
Around-the-World Atomic Clocks: Predicted Relativistic Time Gains
Hafele J. C., Keating Richard E.
Science. 1972 177(4044). p.166
MATHEMATICS AND REALITY
PROKHOVNIK S. J.
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 1977 28(2). p.189
Covariant Ether Theories and Special Relativity
Kholmetskii A L
Physica Scripta. 2003 67(5). p.381
Progress in New Cosmologies (1993)
Experimental and Real Coordinates in Space-Time Transformations
Levy Joseph
Foundations of Physics. 2004 34(12). p.1905
Comments on « a new experimental test of special relativity »
Ruderfer M.
Lettere al Nuovo Cimento. 1970 3(21). p.658
Waves and Particles in Light and Matter (1994)
Frontiers of Fundamental Physics (1994)
An Engineer Becomes Astronomer
Mills Bernard
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 2006 44(1). p.1
Derivation of inertial forces from the Einstein-de Broglie-Bohm (E.d.B.B.) causal stochastic interpretation of quantum mechanics
Vigier Jean-Pierre
Foundations of Physics. 1995 25(10). p.1461
Correspondence
Proceedings of the IRE. 1962 50(9). p.1976
Beyond Newton and Einstein to flowing space
Lindner Henry H.
Physics Essays. 2012 25(4). p.500
Covariant electromagnetic theory for inertial frames with substratum flow
Wilhelm H. E.
Radio Science. 1985 20(5). p.1006
Mechanical Model of Maxwell’s Equations and of Lorentz Transformations
Simeonov Lachezar S.
Foundations of Physics. 2022 52(3).
The relativity principle and the nature of time
Selleri F.
Foundations of Physics. 1997 27(11). p.1527
Quantum Uncertainties (1987)
Motion of a Test Particle According to the Scalar Ether Theory of Gravitation and Application to its Celestial Mechanics
Arminjon Mayeul, Winkler Rainer Wolfgang
Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A. 2019 74(4). p.305
Is a cosmological substratum compatible with relativity?
Prokhovnik S. J.
International Journal of Theoretical Physics. 1974 9(5). p.291
Time and Consistent Relativity (2015)
