Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Huemul heresies: beliefs in search of supporting data. 1. Historical and zooarcheological considerations

Werner T. Flueck A B C D E and Jo Anne M. Smith-Flueck D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A National Council of Scientific and Technological Research (CONICET), Rivadavia 1917, 1033 Buenos Aires, Argentina.

B Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, University of Basel, Socinstrasse 57, 4051 Basel, Switzerland.

C Fundación Bariloche, C.C. 592, 8400 Bariloche, Argentina.

D Institute of Natural Resources Analysis (IARN) – Patagonia, Universidad Atlántida Argentina, C.C. 592, 8400 Bariloche, Argentina.

E Corresponding author. Email: wtf@deerlab.org

Animal Production Science 52(8) 685-693 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN11344
Submitted: 12 December 2011  Accepted: 16 February 2012   Published: 11 July 2012

Abstract

Patagonian huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus) was eliminated from many former ranges before arrival of early explorers who already acknowledged its rareness. Considering huemul analogous to ungulates in mountains back home, huemul was called mountain deer, which is repeatedly cited without validation and remains the orthodox interpretation. Yet other species considered analogous also use lowlands, flatlands, deserts and grasslands, and the only congeneric, H. antisensis, uses habitat with high affinity to Patagonian grasslands. Recent comparative analyses of the post-cranial morphology show that huemul cannot be associated with rock-climbing species, but falls within ranges of other cervids. Interpretations of past human utilisation rely on one study of economic anatomy and bone remains, frequently concluding that huemul was unimportant to hunter-gatherers. However, considering only bone fat and omitting easily removable fat is erroneous. Total energy of deer in autumn–winter partitions into 53% as fat and hunter-gatherers elsewhere focussed on deer during the peak fat cycle, using all easily removable fat (>1200% more energy than in bones) and consuming fat and marrow while butchering. Natives are likely to have influenced huemul distribution and density in winter ranges due to high incentives (fat) and easiness to kill. Sparse evidence is likely the result of surveys in Patagonia having been biased towards caves, leaving out transient movements and camps. Generalist cervids passed the Panama land-bridge filter to reach South America. Considering paleoclimate, Hippocamelus dispersed east of the Andes, pushed by glaciations even to north-eastern Brazil. Hippocamelus would reach and cross Andes only after deglaciations. As a mixed feeder, huemul utilised Patagonian steppe. Hunter-gatherers arrived after the last glaciation and influenced the local distribution of Hippocamelus, especially in northern and central Chile, after early adoption of an agricultural lifestyle. Introduction of horses converted native economies through adoption of an equestrian lifestyle and arrival of millions of introduced livestock, which thus affected early writings. Only few records indicate the presence of large groups of huemul far from forests, and substantial killings. Human-caused range contractions of northern ungulates affected mainly losses at low elevations and most species persisted in the marginal periphery, including high-elevation refuges. Paleoecology, zoogeography and land-use history in southern South America indicate that mountain huemul is a secondary relict created by impacts of post-Columbian colonisation. We caution against the rigid application of modern huemul habitats in interpreting past habitat use and huemul ecology, and simply considering the few extra-Andean accounts as abnormal outliers.

Additional keywords: biogeography, Hippocamelus bisulcus, H. antisensis, historical condition, human influence, morphology, range contractions.


References

Allen JA (1900) The mountain caribou of northern British Columbia. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 18, 1–18.

Allen JA (1905) ‘The Princeton University expeditions to Patagonia, 1896–1899. Vol. 3. Zoology. Part 1. Mammalia of southern Patagonia.’ (E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagshandlung: Stuttgart, Germany)

Anonymous (1904) Excursión del gobernador del Chubut. Caras y Caretas 7, 8 [Buenos Aires]

Bahre CJ (1979) ‘Destruction of the natural vegetation of north–central Chile.’ (University of California Publications in Geography, Vol. 23: Berkeley, CA)

Belardi JB, Otero JG (1998) Anatomia economica del huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus): una contribucion a la interpretacion de las evidencias arqueológicas de su aprovechamiento en Patagonia. Anales del Instituto Patagonico 26, 195–207.

Benedict JB (1999) Effects of changing climate on game-animal and human use of the Colorado High Country (USA) since 1000 BC. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 31, 1–15.
Effects of changing climate on game-animal and human use of the Colorado High Country (USA) since 1000 BC.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Benedict JB (2005) Tundra game drives: an arctic–alpine comparison. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 37, 425–434.
Tundra game drives: an arctic–alpine comparison.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Borrero LA (2008) Early occupations in the southern cone. In ‘Handbook of South American archaeology.’ (Eds H Silverman, W Isbell) pp. 59–77. (Springer Verlag: New York)

Bourlot T (2006) El consumo de grasa en la dieta de poblaciones cazadoras-recolectoras del interior de la estepa Patagónica. Novedades de Antropología 15, 3–6.

Cabrera A, Yepes J (1940) ‘Mamíferos sudamericanos.’ 1st edn. (Compañia Argentina de Editores: Buenos Aires)

Channell R, Lomolino MV (2000) Dynamics biogeography and conservation of endangered species. Nature 403, 84–86.
Dynamics biogeography and conservation of endangered species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXlvVSgug%3D%3D&md5=456dc909200a67c9b513c243e18a43a3CAS |

Church GE (1903) A traveller in Patagonia. Nature 67, 321–322.
A traveller in Patagonia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Conroy MJ, Beier P, Quigley H, Vaughan MR (2006) Improving the use of science in conservation: lessons from the Florida panther. The Journal of Wildlife Management 70, 1–7.
Improving the use of science in conservation: lessons from the Florida panther.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Conway W (2005) ‘Act III in Patagonia: people and wildlife.’ (Island Press: Washington)

Cook FA (1901) With Fuegians on a guanaco hunt. The Outing Magazine 37, 576–580.

Cordain L, Miller JB, Eaton SB, Mann N, Holt SHA, Speth JD (2000) Plant–animal subsistence ratios and macronutrient energy estimations in worldwide hunter-gatherer diets. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 71, 682–692.

Corti P, Wittmer HU, Festa-Bianchet M (2010) Dynamics of a small population of endangered huemul deer (Hippocamelus bisulcus) in Chilean Patagonia. Journal of Mammalogy 91, 690–697.
Dynamics of a small population of endangered huemul deer (Hippocamelus bisulcus) in Chilean Patagonia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cruz I, Munoz AS, Caracotche M (2010) A huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus) antler artefact in archaeological deposits of the Atlantic coast. Implications for human mobility and species distribution. Magallania 38, 287–294.

De Nigris ME (2004) Guanaco and huemul in Patagonian hunter-gatherers diet. In ‘Zooarcheology of South America. BAR International Series 1298’. (Ed. GL Mengoni Gonalons) pp. 11–21. (Archeopress: Oxford, UK)

De Nigris ME (2007) Nuevos datos, viejas colecciones: los conjuntos oseos de Cerro Casa de Piedra Cueva 5 (parque nacional Perito Moreno, Santa Cruz). Intersecciones en Antropologia 8, 253–264.

De Nigris ME, Mengoni Gonalons GL (2005) The guanaco as a source of meat and fat in the southern Andes. In ‘The Zooarchaeology of fats, oils, milk and dairying’. (Eds J Mulville, AK Outram) pp. 160–166. (Oxbow Books: Oxford, UK)

Díaz NI, Smith-Flueck J (2000) ‘The Patagonian huemul. A mysterious deer on the brink of extinction.’ (Literature of Latin America: Buenos Aires)

Dolman PM, Wäber K (2008) Ecosystem and competition impacts of introduced deer. Wildlife Research 35, 202–214.
Ecosystem and competition impacts of introduced deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Eastman CR (1915) Beginnings of American natural history. The America Museum Journal 15, 349–355.

Eisenberg JF (1987) The evolutionary history of the Cervidae with special reference to the South American radiation. In ‘Biology and management of the Cervidae’. (Ed. CM Wemmer) pp. 60–64. (Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, DC)

Fernández PM (2008) Taphonomy and zooarchaeology in the Neotropics: a view from northwestern Patagonian forest and steppe. Quaternary International 180, 63–74.
Taphonomy and zooarchaeology in the Neotropics: a view from northwestern Patagonian forest and steppe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fiedel S, Haynes G (2004) A premature burial: comments on Grayson and Meltzer’s ‘Requiem for overkill’. Journal of Archaeological Science 31, 121–131.
A premature burial: comments on Grayson and Meltzer’s ‘Requiem for overkill’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Flueck WT (2010) Exotic deer in southern Latin America: what do we know about impacts on native deer and on ecosystems? Biological Invasions 12, 1909–1922.
Exotic deer in southern Latin America: what do we know about impacts on native deer and on ecosystems?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Flueck WT, Smith-Flueck JM (2011a) Osteological comparisons of appendicular skeletons: a case study on Patagonian huemul deer and its implications for conservation. Animal Production Science 51, 327–339.

Flueck WT, Smith-Flueck JM (2011b) Huemul heresies: beliefs in search of supporting data. Animal Production Science 51, cxl–clxxix. [1. Historical and zooarcheological considerations. 2. Biological and ecological considerations. 3. Reproduction. Short Communications]

Flueck WT, Smith-Flueck JM (2011c) Recent advances in the nutritional ecology of the Patagonian huemul: implications for recovery. Animal Production Science 51, 311–326.

Flueck WT, Smith-Flueck JM (2012) Huemul heresies: beliefs in search of supporting data. 2. Biological and ecological considerations. Animal Production Science 52, 694–706.
Huemul heresies: beliefs in search of supporting data. 2. Biological and ecological considerations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Frädrich H (1978) Bemerkungen über Nord-Andenhirsche (Hippocamelus antisensis) im Berliner Zoo. Bongo, Berlin 2, 81–88.

Frid A (1999) Huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus) sociality at a periglacial site: sexual aggregation and habitat effects on group size. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77, 1083–1091.

Furlong CW (1912) Hunting the guanaco. The Outing Magazine 61, 2–20.

Gazzolo C (2006) Botanical composition of taruka (Hippocamelus antisensis) diet during rainy season in Huascaran national park, Peru. In ‘Advances in deer biology’. (Eds L Bartos, A Dusek, R Kotrba, J Bartosova) pp. 216. (Research Institute of Animal Production: Prague, Czech Republic)

Gill R, Saucedo C, Aldridge D, Morgan G (2008) Ranging behavior of huemul in relation to habitat and landscape. Journal of Zoology 274, 254–260.
Ranging behavior of huemul in relation to habitat and landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Goepfert N (2010) The llama and the deer: dietary and symbolic dualism in the central Andes. Anthropozoologica 45, 25–45.
The llama and the deer: dietary and symbolic dualism in the central Andes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Guérin C, Faure M (2009) The Cervidae (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) of the Upper Pleistocene/Lower Holocene deposits of the Serra da Capivara National Park Region (Piaui, Brazil). Geobios 42, 169–195.

Heck H (1969) Die Tierwelt ist international. In ‘Parque Diana’. (Ed. CA Vogel) pp. 18–23. (Stefan Schwarz Verlag: München, Germany)

Iriarte A (2008) ‘Mamiferos de Chile.’ (Lynx Ediciones: Barcelona, Spain)

Kolliker Frers A (1969) Das Waidwerk und die autochthonen Cerviden in Argentinien. In ‘Parque Diana’. (Ed. CA Vogel) pp. 25–31. (Stefan Schwarz Verlag: München, Germany)

Krieg H (1925) Biologische Reisestudien in Südamerika. V. Die chilenischen Hirsche. Zeitschrift fur Morphologie und Oekologie der Tiere 4, 585–597.
Biologische Reisestudien in Südamerika. V. Die chilenischen Hirsche.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kurtén B (1975) A new pleistocene genus of american mountain deer. Journal of Mammalogy 56, 507–508.
A new pleistocene genus of american mountain deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kurtén B (1979) A stilt-legged deer Sangamona of the North-American Pleistocene. Boreas 8, 313–321.
A stilt-legged deer Sangamona of the North-American Pleistocene.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lacroix F (1841) ‘Historia de la Patagonia, Tierra de Fuego, e Islas Malvinas.’ (Imprenta del Liberal Barcelones: Barcelona, Spain)

Laliberte AS, Ripple WJ (2004) Range contractions of North American carnivores and ungulates. Bioscience 54, 123–138.
Range contractions of North American carnivores and ungulates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lista R (1887) ‘Viaje al país de los Onas, Tierra del Fuego.’ (Establecimiento Tipografico de Alberto Nunez: Buenos Aires)

Lord RD (2007) ‘Mammals of South America.’ (JHU Press: Baltimore, MD)

Lovis WA, Donahue RE, Holman MB (2005) Long-distance logistic mobility as an organizing principle among northern hunter-gatherers: a Great Lakes middle holocene settlement system. American Antiquity 70, 669–693.
Long-distance logistic mobility as an organizing principle among northern hunter-gatherers: a Great Lakes middle holocene settlement system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lupo KD (2007) Evolutionary foraging models in zooarchaeological analysis: recent applications and future challenges. Journal of Archaeological Research 15, 143–189.
Evolutionary foraging models in zooarchaeological analysis: recent applications and future challenges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

MacDouall J (1833) ‘Narratives of a voyage to Patagonia and Terra del Fuego.’ (Renshaw and Rush: London)

MacNamara MC (1982) Huemul: a deer of distinction. Animal Kingdom 85, 5–13.

Mansur ME, Piqué R (2009) Between the forest and the sea: hunter-gatherer occupations in the subantarctic forests in Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. Arctic Anthropology 46, 144–157.
Between the forest and the sea: hunter-gatherer occupations in the subantarctic forests in Tierra del Fuego, Argentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McCullough DR, Ullrey DE (1983) Proximate mineral and gross energy composition of white-tailed deer. The Journal of Wildlife Management 47, 430–441.
Proximate mineral and gross energy composition of white-tailed deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Merino ML, Milne N, Vizcaíno SF (2005) A cranial morphometric study of deer (Mammalia, Cervidae) from Argentina using three-dimensional landmarks. Acta Theriologica 50, 91–108.
A cranial morphometric study of deer (Mammalia, Cervidae) from Argentina using three-dimensional landmarks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Michahelles DR (1831) Steinbock Capra ibex. Allgemeine Forst und Jagdzeitung 20, 77–78.

Miller GR, Burger RL (1995) Our father the Cayman, our dinner the Llama: animal utilization at Chavin de Huantar, Peru. American Antiquity 60, 421–458.
Our father the Cayman, our dinner the Llama: animal utilization at Chavin de Huantar, Peru.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Morejohn GV, Dailey DC (2004) The identity and postcranial osteology of Odocoileus lucasi (Hay) 1927. Sierra College Natural History Museum Bulletin 1, 1–54.

Morin E (2007) Fat composition and Nunamiut decision-making: a new look at the marrow and bone grease indices. Journal of Archaeological Science 34, 69–82.
Fat composition and Nunamiut decision-making: a new look at the marrow and bone grease indices.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Muñoz AS, Mondini M (2008) Long-term human/animal interactions and their implications for hunter-gatherer archaeology in South America. In ‘Time and change’. (Eds D Papagianni, R Layton, H Maschner) pp. 55–71. (Oxbow Books: Oxford, UK)

Muñoz-Pedreros A, Valenzuela JY (2009) ‘Mamiferos de Chile.’ 2nd edn. (CEA Ediciones: Valdivia, Chile)

National Research Council (1991) ‘Micro-livestock: little-known small animals with a promising economic future.’ (The National Academies Press: Washington, DC)

Nowak RM, Walker EP (1999) ‘Walker’s mammals of the world.’ (JHU Press: Baltimore, MD)

Osgood WH (1923) The Marshall Chilean field expedition 1922–1923. Field notes. Available at www.sites.google.com/a/fieldmuseum.org/bruce-pattersons-lab/Home/collections/osgood-files [verified April 2012]

Osgood WH (1943) The mammals of Chile. Field Museum of Natural History Zoological Series 30, 1–268.

Philippi RA (1895) ‘Drei Hirsche der Anden.’ (F. A. Brockhaus: Leipzig, Germany)

Povilitis A (1978) The Chilean huemul project – A case history (1975–1976). In ‘Threatened deer’. pp. 109–128. (IUCN: Morges, Switzerland)

Price WA (1939) ‘Nutrition and physical degeneration. A comparison of primitive and modern diets and their effects.’ (Paul B. Hoeber Inc.: New York)

Prichard HH (1902a) Field notes upon some of the larger mammals of Patagonia made between September 1900 and June 1901. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1, 272–277.

Prichard HH (1902b) ‘Through the heart of Patagonia.’ (D. Appleton and Co.: New York)

Prothero DR, Foss SE (2007) ‘The Evolution of Artiodactyls.’ (JHU Press: Baltimore, MD)

Prothero DR, Schoch RM (2002) ‘Horns, tusks, and flippers: the evolution of hoofed mammals.’ (JHU Press: Baltimore, MD)

Putman R, Flueck WT (2011) Intraspecific variation in biology and ecology of deer: magnitude and causation. Animal Production Science 51, 277–291.

Rabassa J, Coronato A, Martínez O (2011) Late Cenozoic glaciations in Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego: an updated review. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London 103, 316–335.
Late Cenozoic glaciations in Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego: an updated review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rasmussen PC (1994) Geographic variation in morphology and allozymes of South American imperial shags. The Auk 111, 143–161.

Redford KH, Eisenberg JF (1992) ‘Mammals of the Neotropics: The southern cone. Vol. 2. Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay.’ (The University of Chicago Press: Chicago and London)

Sierralta D (2003) La microhistología de fecas para el estudio de dieta del huemul. In ‘Huemul ecology research for conservation planning’. (Darwin Initiative: Cochrane, Chile)

Smith-Flueck JM (2003) The ecology of huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus) in Andean Patagonia of Argentina and considerations about its conservation. Doctoral Dissertation, Universidad Nacional Comahue, Bariloche, Argentina.

Steward JH (1946) Handbook of South American Indians. Vol. 1. The marginal tribes. Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution. Bulletin 143, 1–624.

Tavener LE (1955) Notes on the Indians of Patagonia made by W. Mogg in 1829. Man 55, 59–61.
Notes on the Indians of Patagonia made by W. Mogg in 1829.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vila AR, Saucedo C, Aldridge D, Ramilo E, Corti P (2010) South Andean huemul Hippocamelus bisulcus (Molina 1782). In ‘Neotropical Cervidology’. (Eds JM Duarte, S González) pp. 89–100. (FUNEP: Jaboticabal, Brazil)

Webb SD (1992) A cranium of Navahoceros and its phylogenetic place among New World Cervidae. Annales Zoologici Fennici 28, 401–410.

Wensing D (2005) Conservation study of the huemul (Hippocamelus bisculcus) within the Bernardo O’Higgins National Park, Chile. Thesis report NWS-I-2005-6, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Willis B (1914) ‘El norte de la Patagonia.’ (Ministerio de Obras Publicas: Buenos Aires)