Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Characteristics of patients aged 50–74 years with a request for an immunochemical faecal occult blood test in the Australian general practice setting

Allan Pollack A , Doreen Busingye A * , Jill Thistlethwaite A , Suzanne Blogg A and Kendal Chidwick A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A NPS MedicineWise, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.

* Correspondence to: busingyedoreen@gmail.com

Australian Health Review 46(2) 222-232 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH21129
Submitted: 12 April 2021  Accepted: 11 October 2021   Published: 28 February 2022

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of AHHA.

Abstract

Objective To support improving participation in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP), we aimed to identify Medicare-subsidised test requests for immunochemical faecal occult blood tests (FOBT) in Australian general practice for patients aged 50–74 years, eligible for the NBCSP, and describe sociodemographics, risk factors, indications and outcomes.

Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted using de-identified data from 441 Australian general practice sites in the MedicineInsight database, recorded from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019.

Results Of the 683 625 eligible patients, 45 771 (6.7%) had a record of a general practitioner (GP)-requested FOBT, either to aid diagnosis in symptomatic patients, or for screening; 144 986 (21.2%) patients had only an NBCSP FOBT. A diagnosis of polyps, gastrointestinal inflammatory condition or haemorrhoids, or a referral to a gastroenterologist or general surgeon, was more commonly recorded in the 6 months after a GP-requested FOBT than after an NBCSP FOBT. Uptake of NBCSP FOBTs was lower among those with obesity, high alcohol consumption and current smokers, who are at higher risk of bowel cancer.

Conclusions This study describes the patient characteristics, reasons and outcomes associated with GP-requested FOBTs, identifies under-screened population sub-groups, and suggests involvement of GPs to improve participation in the NBCSP.

Keywords: bowel cancer, early detection, faecal occult blood tests, general practice, MedicineInsight, National Bowel Cancer Screening Program, patient profiles, primary care, screening.


References

[1]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer data in Australia. 2019. Available at https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer/cancer-data-in-australia/contents/rankings [verified 31 March 2020].

[2]  Cancer Council Australia Colorectal Cancer Guidelines Working Party. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention, early detection and management of colorectal cancer. Short form summary of NHMRC approved recommendations. 2017. Available at https://wiki.cancer.org.au/australia/Guidelines:Colorectal_cancer [verified 31 March 2020].

[3]  Morris M, Iacopetta B, Platell C. Comparing survival outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer treated in public and private hospitals. Med J Aust 2007; 186 296–300.
Comparing survival outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer treated in public and private hospitals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17371210PubMed |

[4]  Australian Government Department of Health. National Bowel Cancer Screening Program. 2020. Available at http://www.cancerscreening.gov.au/internet/screening/publishing.nsf/Content/bowel-screening-1 [verified 31 March 2020].

[5]  Australian Government Department of Health. National Bowel Cancer Screening Program Policy Framework. 2017. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2019/10/national-bowel-cancer-screening-program-policy-framework.pdf [verified 3 August 2021].

[6]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer screening programs: quarterly data. 2020. Available at https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer-screening/national-cancer-screening-programs-participation/contents/national-bowel-cancer-screening-program [verified 25 March 2021].

[7]  Lew JB, St John DJB, Xu XM, et al. Long-term evaluation of benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia: a modelling study. Lancet Public Health 2017; 2 e331–e340.
Long-term evaluation of benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia: a modelling study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29253458PubMed |

[8]  Zajac IT, Flight I, Turnbull D, Young G, Cole S, Wilson C. Self-reported bowel screening rates in older Australians and the implications for public health screening programs. Australas Med J 2013; 6 411–417.
Self-reported bowel screening rates in older Australians and the implications for public health screening programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24039635PubMed |

[9]  Parkin CJ, Bell SW, Mirbagheri N. Colorectal cancer screening in Australia: an update. Aust J Gen Pract 2018; 47 859–863.
Colorectal cancer screening in Australia: an update.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31212405PubMed |

[10]  National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. National guide to a preventive health assessment for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. 3rd edn. 2018. Available at https://www.racgp.org.au/FSDEDEV/media/documents/Clinical%20Resources/Resources/National‐guide‐3rd‐ed‐Sept‐2018‐web.pdf [verified 6 July 2021].

[11]  Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. RACGP submission on the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program Review. 2020. Available at https://www.racgp.org.au/advocacy/reports-and-submissions/view-all-reports-and-submissions/2020-reports-and-submissions/submission-on-the-national-bowel-cancer-screening [verified 24 September 2021].

[12]  Lew JB, St John DJB, Macrae FA, et al. Evaluation of the benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of potential alternatives to iFOBT testing for colorectal cancer screening in Australia. Int J Cancer 2018; 143 269–282.
Evaluation of the benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of potential alternatives to iFOBT testing for colorectal cancer screening in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29441568PubMed |

[13]  Lew JB, Feletto E, Wade S, et al. Benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of cancer screening in Australia: an overview of modelling estimates. Public Health Res Pract 2019; 29 e2921913
Benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of cancer screening in Australia: an overview of modelling estimates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[14]  Worthington J, Lew JB, Feletto E, et al. Improving Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program outcomes through increased participation and cost-effective investment. PLoS One 2020; 15 e0227899
Improving Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program outcomes through increased participation and cost-effective investment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32012174PubMed |

[15]  Busingye D, Gianacas C, Pollack A, et al. Data Resource Profile: MedicineInsight, an Australian national primary health care database. Int J Epidemiol 2019; 48 1741–1741h.
Data Resource Profile: MedicineInsight, an Australian national primary health care database.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31292616PubMed |

[16]  NPS MedicineWise. General Practice Insights Report July 2018–June 2019. 2020. Available at https://www.nps.org.au/assets/Report-2018-19-GPIR-final-signed-off-by-DOH.pdf [verified 23 December 2020].

[17]  Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. RACGP standards for general practices. 2015. Available at https://www.racgp.org.au/download/documents/Standards/standards4thedition.pdf [verified 8 July 2021].

[18]  Australian Bureau of Statistics. The Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS) remoteness structure. 2018. Available at https://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/D3310114.nsf/home/remoteness+structure [verified 23 March 2020].

[19]  Australian Bureau of Statistics. Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas. 2018. Available at http://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/censushome.nsf/home/seifa [verified 7 November 2019].

[20]  Bailie L, Loughrey MB, Coleman HG. Lifestyle risk factors for serrated colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2017; 152 92–104.
Lifestyle risk factors for serrated colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27639804PubMed |

[21]  Whiteman DC, Webb PM, Green AC, et al. Cancers in Australia in 2010 attributable to modifiable factors: summary and conclusions. Aust N Z J Public Health 2015; 39 477–484.
Cancers in Australia in 2010 attributable to modifiable factors: summary and conclusions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26437735PubMed |

[22]  World Cancer Research Fund International, American Institute for Cancer Research. Continuous update project expert report 2018: diet, nutrition, physical activity and colorectal cancer. 2018. Available at https://www.wcrf.org/sites/default/files/Colorectal-cancer-report.pdf [verified 2 July 2020].

[23]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: monitoring report 2020. 2020. Available at https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/da6be503-6185-4b05-9724-953f81ad31de/aihw-can-133_31July2020.pdf.aspx?inline=true [verified 25 March 2021].

[24]  Otto SJ, Schroder FH, de Koning HJ. Low all-cause mortality in the volunteer-based Rotterdam section of the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer: self-selection bias? J Med Screen 2004; 11 89–92.
Low all-cause mortality in the volunteer-based Rotterdam section of the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer: self-selection bias?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15153324PubMed |

[25]  Pinsky PF, Miller A, Kramer BS, et al. Evidence of a healthy volunteer effect in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial. Am J Epidemiol 2007; 165 874–881.
Evidence of a healthy volunteer effect in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17244633PubMed |

[26]  Australian Government Department of Health. National Bowel Cancer Screening Program Primary Health Care Engagement Strategy 2016–2020. 2016. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2019/10/national-bowel-cancer-screening-program-primary-health-care-engagement-strategy_0.pdf [verified 3 August 2021].

[27]  National Cancer Screening Register. For healthcare providers. 2020. Available at https://ncsr.gov.au/content/ncsr/en/healthcare-providers.html [verified 20 January 2021].

[28]  Lofti-Jam KL, O’Reilly CL, Feng CS, Wakefield MA, Durkin S, Broun KH. Increasing bowel cancer screening participation: integrating population-wide, primary care and more targeted approaches. Public Health Res Pract 2019; 29 2921916
| 31384890PubMed |

[29]  Cancer Council Australia. For GPs, practice nurses and other health professionals. 2020. Available at http://www.bowelcancer.org.au/for-health-professionals.php [verified 20 January 2021].