Assessing the implementation of a career development framework targeting early career allied health professionals
Matthew Webb
A , Margaret Holyday B * , Marianna Milosavljevic C , Tiana-lee Elphick C D and Patrick Dunn B
A
B
C
D
Abstract
The primary objective of this study was to engage early career allied health professionals (ECAH) in a career development framework targeted specifically to their needs. The secondary objectives were to: identify if the framework increased clinician participants’ career achievements and altered manager participants’ practices in offering development opportunities to ECAH. This was a 12-month observational (non-experimental) trial of a pragmatic program implementation. Data collected included: initial uptake of staff into the program; retention rate after 12 months; number of participants’ career achievements; and program evaluation by both participants and managers. At 12 months, 35 of the 123 enrolled ECAH remained engaged in the career development program; that is, 28.5% retention, and these participants had an increased number of achievements. The program was effective in broadening managers’ practices, 77% offered increased opportunities to ECAH across the development domains of supervision, service planning and quality. This study was partially successful in meeting its objectives. It was unsuccessful in retaining ECAH in a career development program for 12 months, although it was successful in increasing the number of achievements for those ECAH that remained engaged. It also broadened managers’ practice in the opportunities they offered. The program’s success was heavily reliant on the intrinsic motivation of both managers and clinicians. Increasing career development opportunities for AH is important to pursue as a means of increasing satisfaction, retention, and fostering a culture of quality and safety.
Keywords: allied health, career development, career progression, early career, education and training, job satisfaction, motivation, professional skills, quality and safety, retention, work engagement, workforce, workforce development.
References
1 Rawashdeh AM, Elayan MB, Shamout MD, Hamouche S. Human resource development and turnover intention: organizational commitment’s role as a mediating variable. Eur J Manag Bus Econ 2021; 31(4): 469-484.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
2 Bacopanos E, Edgar S. Identifying the factors that affect the job satisfaction of early career Notre Dame graduate physiotherapists. Aust Health Rev 2016; 40(5): 538-543.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
3 Wilson NA. Factors that affect job satisfaction and intention to leave of allied health professionals in a metropolitan hospital. Aust Health Rev 2015; 39(3): 290-294.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
4 Baumgartner L, Wright O, Barne K, Bartrim K, Kirkegaard A, Sullivan V, Burch E, Ball L. What factors affect the recruitment and retention of allied health professionals working in hospitals? A systematic literature review. Aust Health Rev 2024; 49: AH24287.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
5 Cosgrave C. Context Matters: Findings from a Qualitative Study Exploring Service and Place Factors Influencing the Recruitment and Retention of Allied Health Professionals in Rural Australian Public Health Services. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(16): 5815.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
6 National Advisory Group on the Safety of Patients in England. A Promise to Learn – A Commitment to Act: Improving the Safety of Patients in England. London. 2013. Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/226703/Berwick_Report.pdf
7 Cooke M, Ironside PM, Ogrinc GS. Mainstreaming quality and safety: a reformulation of quality and safety education for health professions students. BMJ Qual Saf 2011; 20(Suppl 1): i79-i82.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
8 Reed JE, Antonacci G, Armstrong N, Baker GR, Crowe S, Harenstam KP, Hargreaves D, Jani YH, Provost L, Rejler M, Savage C, Thor J, Williams S, Woodcock T. What is improvement science, and what makes it different? An outline of the field and its frontiers. Front Health Serv 2025; 4: 1454658.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
11 Herzberg F. Motivation-hygiene profiles: Pinpointing what ails the organization. Org Dyn 1974; 3(2): 18-29.
| Google Scholar |
12 Nickerson C. Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory Of Motivation-Hygiene. Simply Psych 2025; Available at https://www.simplypsychology.org/herzbergs-two-factor-theory.html.
| Google Scholar |
14 Hewko S, Oyesegun A, Clow S, VanLeeuwen C. High turnover in clinical dietetics: a qualitative analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21: 25.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
15 Halter M, Boiko O, Pelone F, et al. The determinants and consequences of adult nursing staff turnover: a systematic review of systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17: 824.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
17 Milosavljevic M, Noble G, Goluza I, Keep A, Ponta G. New South Wales public-hospital dietitians and how they feel about their workplace: An explorative study using a grounded theory approach. Nutr Diet 2014; 72(2): 107-113.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
18 Popivanov P, McCarthy SE, Finn M. Developing and piloting a peer quality improvement coaching protocol for front-line healthcare staff. BMJ Open Qual 2025; 14: e002967.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
19 Ree E, Wiig S. Linking transformational leadership, patient safety culture and work engagement in home care services. Nurs Open 2019; 7(1): 256-264.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
20 Shaikh U, Lachman P, Padovani AJ, McCarthy SE. The care and keeping of clinicians in quality improvement. Int J Qual Health Care 2020; 32(7): 480-485.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
