Improving inpatient mental health nurses practice through the use of a standardised instrument
V. K. Drinkwater A , M. Giles A B C , A. P. O’Brien D , C. Harmon A and R. J. Tynan A B E *A
B
C
D
E
Abstract
The role of mental health nurses (MHNs) working in inpatient units involves providing care to patients with complex needs and challenging behaviours, with reporting and documenting findings from brief interactions a critical part of their duties. Despite this, there is no agreed-upon instrument to document a patient’s mental state or recognise signs of progress or deterioration. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of implementing a standardised instrument known as the SMART card on MHNs documentation, knowledge, and self-efficacy in assessing and reporting a patient’s mental state.
The SMART card was implemented across eight mental health inpatient units. Completion rates of the SMART card and quality of assessments were measured using a file/chart audit before and 3 months post-implementation. A pre/post-implementation survey measured changes in MHNs’ perceived knowledge and self-efficacy, with the post survey evaluating attitudes towards training and SMART card acceptability.
Clinical file audits showed significant improvement in completion rates in documentation of key clinical/symptom domains. Survey results showed a positive attitude towards the SMART card, with training having increased MHNs’ understanding of psychiatric terminology and significantly improved confidence and self-efficacy.
This study demonstrates how the implementation of a standardised instrument significantly improved MHNs’ reporting of patient mental health status.
Keywords: assessment, deterioration, documentation, mental state, MSE, nursing, SMART card, standardised assessment tools.
References
1 Newson JJ, Hunter D, Thiagarajan TC. The heterogeneity of mental health assessment. Front Psychiatry 2020; 11: 76.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
2 Wand T, Buchanan-Hagen S, Derrick K, et al. Are current mental health assessment formats consistent with contemporary thinking and practice? Int J Ment Health Nurs 2020; 29: 171-176.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
6 Mullen A, Drinkwater V, Lewin TJ. Care zoning in a psychiatric intensive care unit: strengthening ongoing clinical risk assessment. J Clin Nurs 2014; 23: 731-743.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
7 Cleary M, Hunt GE, Horsfall J, et al. Nurse-patient interaction in acute adult inpatient mental health units: a review and synthesis of qualitative studies. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2012; 33: 66-79.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
8 Coombs T, Crookes P, Curtis J. A comprehensive mental health nursing assessment: variability of content in practice. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2013; 20: 150-155.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
10 Jacoby R. Book Review: Assessment of Mental Capacity: Guidance for Doctors and Lawyers (2nd edn) By The British Medical Association and The Law Society. London: BMJ Books2004. 260 pp.£ 19.95 (pb). ISBN 0 7279 16718. Br J Psychiatry 2004; 185: 273.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
11 Voss RM. Mental status examination. 2019. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546682