Just Accepted

This article has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication. It is in production and has not been edited, so may differ from the final published form.

Red Tape Delays Maternal Morbidity Study: Problems and Possible Solutions.

Joanne Frost , Edward Weaver, Leonie Callaway

Abstract

Objective: To outline the bureaucratic process of obtaining ethical and governance approval to undertake a research project on Severe Acute Maternal Morbidity (SAMM), highlighting the impact this had on performing research in a timely way. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive case study evaluation, from the researcher's perspective, of the research ethics and governance process required, during 2022-2023, to conduct a retrospective audit of 20 years of one SAMM event (Peripartum Hysterectomy) in 5 public maternity care facilities (2 Hospital and Health Services (HHS)) within a single state of Australia. Outcome measures included: The number of documents/forms completed, emails sent, phone calls/meetings held, number of people involved in approval, the number of submissions/re-submissions required and the time to obtain ethics/governance approval (working days). Results: Ten data custodian approvals from within the same organisation were required to obtain Peripartum Hysterectomy data from 5 statewide databases and from local records in 2 HHS. Overall, it took 268 working days from submission of the first ethics application, to obtaining approval for the final governance application. Conclusions: Cumbersome research approval processes consume a lot of research time. Our study exemplifies the continuing overregulation of low and negligible risk research that continues to limit investigation and prevention of serious obstetric conditions.

AH25018  Accepted 09 July 2025

© CSIRO 2025