Register      Login
Australian Mammalogy Australian Mammalogy Society
Journal of the Australian Mammal Society
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Building an army of wombat warriors: developing and sustaining a citizen science project

Candice J. Skelton A B , Amelia S. Cook A , Peter West C , Ricky-John Spencer A and Julie M. Old A D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Science and Health, Hawkesbury Campus, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.

B Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, 38 Thynne Street, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia.

C NSW Department of Primary Industries, Forest Road, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: j.old@westernsydney.edu.au

Australian Mammalogy 41(2) 186-195 https://doi.org/10.1071/AM18018
Submitted: 3 July 2018  Accepted: 8 September 2018   Published: 1 October 2018

Abstract

Citizen science websites and mobile applications are credited for their ability to engage members of the public in science and enhance scientific literacy, while operating as a cost-effective, geographically vast data-collection tool. Recruiting participants, tailoring online platforms to users’ needs and harnessing community values are key to creating a successful, sustainable citizen science project. However, few studies have conducted a detailed examination of the recruitment experience when trying to build an engaged and active citizen science audience to assess wildlife diseases in Australia. The present study aimed to determine the most effective methods to recruit and continue to engage citizens to use the tool called WomSAT (Wombat Survey and Analysis Tools). Various marketing techniques were employed to recruit participants. A survey was also disseminated to gain feedback on WomSAT and understand the driving factors behind participation. Participation in the WomSAT project was driven by a collective desire to help and learn about wombats. Preliminary distribution data collected by citizens suggest that WomSAT contains the necessary elements to enable it to be an important tool for monitoring wombats and the distribution of disease. Continuation of the WomSAT project will support scientific research while fostering conservation messages amongst the Australian community.


References

Andow, D. A., Borgida, E., Hurley, T. M., and Williams, A. L. (2016). Recruitment and retention of volunteers in a citizen science network to detect invasive species on private lands. Environmental Management 58, 606–618.
Recruitment and retention of volunteers in a citizen science network to detect invasive species on private lands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Atlas of Living Australia (2015). The ALA User Survey is now available! Available at: http://www.ala.org.au/blogs-news/the-ala-user-survey-is-now-available/

Becker, S., and Mottay, D. (2001). A global perspective on website usability. IEEE Software 18, 54–61.
A global perspective on website usability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Begley, P. (2015). Ten wombats deliberately killed in national park. Sydney Morning Herald. Available at: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/eight-wombats-deliberately-killed-in-national-park-20150919-gjqmdh.html [accessed 21 September 2015].

Belt, J., and Krausman, P. (2012). Evaluating population estimates of mountain goats based on citizen science. Wildlife Society Bulletin 36, 264–276.
Evaluating population estimates of mountain goats based on citizen science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bennett, R., and Kottasz, R. (2001). Advertisement style and the recruitment of charity volunteers. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 8, 45–63.
Advertisement style and the recruitment of charity volunteers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bradford, B. M., and Israel, G. D. (2004). ‘Evaluating Volunteer Motivation for Sea Turtle Conservation in Florida.’ (University of Florida: Gainesville, FL.)

Bultitude, K., and Sardo, M. (2012). Leisure and pleasure: science events in unusual locations. International Journal of Science Education 34, 2775–2795.
Leisure and pleasure: science events in unusual locations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Callow, M. (2004). Identifying promotional appeals for targeting potential volunteers: an exploratory study on volunteering motives among retirees. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 9, 261–274.
Identifying promotional appeals for targeting potential volunteers: an exploratory study on volunteering motives among retirees.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., and Ridge, R. (1992). Volunteers’ motivations: a functional strategy for the recruitment, placement and retention of volunteers. Nonprofit Management & Leadership 2, 333–350.
Volunteers’ motivations: a functional strategy for the recruitment, placement and retention of volunteers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Phillips, T., and Bonney, R. (2007). Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecology and Society 12, 11.
Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Crall, A., Kosmala, M., Cheng, R., Brier Cavalier, D., and Henderson, S. (2017). Volunteer recruitment and retention in online citizen science projects using marketing strategies: lessons from Season Spotter. Journal of Science Communication 16, A01.
Volunteer recruitment and retention in online citizen science projects using marketing strategies: lessons from Season Spotter.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dean, E., Cook, S., Murphy, J., and Keating, M. (2012). The effectiveness of survey recruitments in second life. Social Science Computer Review 30, 324–338.
The effectiveness of survey recruitments in second life.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dickinson, J., and Bonney, R. (2012). ‘Citizen Science: Public Participation in Environmental Research.’ (Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY.)

FitzGibbon, S. I., and Jones, D. N. (2006). A community-based wildlife survey: the knowledge and attitudes of residents of surburban Brisbane, with a focus on bandicoots. Wildlife Research 33, 233–241.
A community-based wildlife survey: the knowledge and attitudes of residents of surburban Brisbane, with a focus on bandicoots.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hill, N. J., Carbery, K. A., and Deane, E. M. (2007). Human–possum conflict in urban Sydney, Australia: public perceptions and implicatons for species management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 12, 101–113.
Human–possum conflict in urban Sydney, Australia: public perceptions and implicatons for species management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hobbs, S. J., and White, P. C. L. (2015). Achieving positive social outcomes through participatory urban wildlife conservation projects. Wildlife Research 42, 607–617.
Achieving positive social outcomes through participatory urban wildlife conservation projects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lewandowski, E. J., and Oberhauser, K. S. (2017). Contributions of citizen scientists and habitat volunteers to monarch butterfly conservation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 22, 55–70.
Contributions of citizen scientists and habitat volunteers to monarch butterfly conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lunney, D., Esson, C., Moon, C., Ellis, M., and Matthews, A. (1997). A community-based survey of the koala, Phascolarctos cinereus, in the Eden region of south-eastern New South Wales. Wildlife Research 24, 111–128.
A community-based survey of the koala, Phascolarctos cinereus, in the Eden region of south-eastern New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Martin, R., Handasyde, K., and Skerratt, L. (1998). Current distribution of sarcoptic mange in wombats. Australian Veterinary Journal 76, 411–414.
Current distribution of sarcoptic mange in wombats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McCarthy, M. (2010). Experiential learning theory: from theory to practice. Journal of Business & Economics Research 8, 131–140.
Experiential learning theory: from theory to practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Newman, G., Zimmerman, D., Crall, A., Laituri, M., Graham, J., and Stapel, L. (2010). User-friendly web mapping: lessons from a citizen science website. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 24, 1851–1869.
User-friendly web mapping: lessons from a citizen science website.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nguyen, B., McGregor, K., O’Connor, J., Shrewsbury, V., Lee, A., Steinbeck, K., Hill, A. J., Shah, S., Kohn, M. R., and Baur, L. A. (2012). Recruitment challenges and recommendations for adolescent obesity trials. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 48, 38–43.
Recruitment challenges and recommendations for adolescent obesity trials.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nov, O., Arazy, O., and Anderson, D. (2014). Scientists@home: what drives the quantity and quality of online citizen science participation? PLoS One 9, e90375.
Scientists@home: what drives the quantity and quality of online citizen science participation?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Paine, K. (2011). ‘Measure What Matters: Online Tools for Understanding Customers, Social Media Engagement and Key Relationships.’ (John Wiley and Sons.)

Pocock, M. J. O., Chapman, D. S., Sheppard, L. J., and Roy, H. E. (2014). ‘Choosing and Using Citizen Science: a Guide to When and How to Use Citizen Science to Monitor Biodiversity and the Environment.’ (Centre for Ecology and Hydrology: Oxford.)

Raddick, J. M., Bracey, G., Gay, P. L., Lintott, C. J., Murray, P., Schawinski, K., Szalay, A. S., and Vandenberg, J. (2010). Galaxy zoo: exploring the motivations of citizen science volunteers. Astronomy Education Review 9, 1–18.
Galaxy zoo: exploring the motivations of citizen science volunteers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rotman, D., Preece, J., Hammock, J., Procita, K., Hansen, D., Parr, C., Lewis, D., and Jacobs, D. (2012). Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. In ‘Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Proceedings of the ACM Conference 2012, Seattle, WA, USA, 11–15 February’. pp. 217–226. (ACM: New York.) Available at 10.1145/2145204.2145238

Roy, H. E., Pocock, M. J. O., Preston, C. D., Roy, D. B., and Savage, J. (2012). Understanding citizen science and environmental monitoring. UK Environmental Observation Framework. Available at: https://www.ceh.ac.uk/sites/default/files/citizensciencereview.pdf

Sensis (2015). How Australian people and businesses are using social media. Available at: https://www.sensis.com.au/content/dam/sas/PDFdirectory/Sensis_Social_Media_Report_2015.pdf

Silverman, D. (2012). ‘Interpreting Qualitative Data.’ (SAGE Publications Ltd: London.)

Wald, D. M., Longo, J., and Dobell, A. R. (2016). Design principles for engaging and retaining virtual citizen scientists. Conservation Biology 30, 562–570.
Design principles for engaging and retaining virtual citizen scientists.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Waters, R. D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A., and Lucas, J. (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: how non-profit organisations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review 35, 102–106.
Engaging stakeholders through social networking: how non-profit organisations are using Facebook.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Williams, C. R., Hawthorn-Jackon, D., Orre-Gordon, S., and O’Sullivan, S. (2017). Some cautions in the use of citizen science: a case study of urban insect collection. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 141, 57–69.
Some cautions in the use of citizen science: a case study of urban insect collection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |