Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Response of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) to seasonal and local changes in dietary energy content and quality

Andreas König https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9232-5026 A C , Martina Hudler A , Sarah-Alica Dahl https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8300-6982 A , Carmen Bolduan B , Daniel Brugger B and Wilhelm Windisch B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Technical University of Munich, Wildlife Biology and Management Unit, Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz Platz 2, D-85354 Freising, Germany.

B Technical University of Munich, Chair of Animal Nutrition, Liesel-Beckmann-Strasse 2, D-85354 Freising, Germany.

C Corresponding author. Email: koenig@wzw.tum.de

Animal Production Science 60(10) 1315-1325 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN19375
Submitted: 6 July 2019  Accepted: 26 January 2020   Published: 30 April 2020

Journal Compilation © CSIRO 2020 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND

Abstract

Context: In terms of their nutritional physiology, roe deer have been called ‘concentrate selectors’. This implies that they select proteins in their diet and are not able to digest fibre. It is, thus, suggested that in an agricultural landscape, they are unable to digest the high fibre content of arable crops and, thus, suffer and need to be given supplementary feed.

Aims: Our aim was to determine the nutrient composition and energy content of the roe deer diet in an agricultural habitat compared with that in a natural forest habitat.

Methods: Rumen contents of 245 roe deer were collected to represent each month of the year for 3 years, weighed, and analysed by standard methods for nutrient and fibre content.

Key results: Roe deer in the agricultural habitat had rumen contents with significantly higher metabolisable energy (ME) concentrations, with a median of 6.2 MJ ME/kg DM, than did roe deer in the forest habitat, where the median was 5.4 MJ ME/kg DM. The mass of rumen contents in the forest habitat was, on average, 240 g higher than that in the agricultural habitat. Roe deer in the forest habitat compensate for the lower energy concentration in their natural diet by increasing their food intake. The concentration in the agricultural habitat is a result of the higher proportion of easily digestible carbohydrates in the diet. The concentration of crude protein in the rumen contents did not differ statistically between the two areas. In both habitats, the mean crude fibre concentration varied between 24% DM and 34% DM, and was significantly higher in the forest. The concentration of crude fibre selected by the roe deer is similar to the concentration of crude fibre known to be selected by red deer and fallow deer (intermediate feeders) and mouflon (a grazer) (Hofmann 1989).

Conclusions: The term ‘concentrate selector’ should be replaced by ‘selector’ to avoid misinterpretations. Energy shortfalls were not observed in either of the populations during the study period.

Implications: Supplemental feeding was not necessary to maintain the population.

Additional keywords: cervid, crude fibre, metabolisable energy, nutrition, ruminants, selector.


References

Abbas F, Morellet N, Hewison AJM, Merlet J, Cargnelutti B, Lourtet B, Angibault J-M, Daufresne T, Aulagnier S, Verheyden H (2011) Landscape fragmentation generates spatial variation of diet composition and quality in a generalist herbivore. Oecologia 167, 401–411.
Landscape fragmentation generates spatial variation of diet composition and quality in a generalist herbivore.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21519885PubMed |

Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC (Eds) (1998) ‘The European roe deer: the biology of success.’ (Scandinavian University Press: Oslo, Norway)

Anke M, Dittrich G, Groppel B, Schäfer U, Müller R, Hoppe C (2005) Zusammensetzung und Aufnahme von Winteräsung durch Reh-, Muffel-, Dam- und Rotwild. In ‘Beiträge zur Jagd- und Wildforschng. Vol. 32’. (Ed. C Stubbe) Jana Vertriebs GmbH, Melsungen pp. 379–398.

AOAC (Ed.) (2019) ‘Official methods of analysis of AOAC International.’ (AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD)

Arnold W (2013) Jahreszeitliche Anpassung bei Wildwiederkäuern: wo steht das Rehwild? Hege und Bejagung des Rehwildes. Feldkirchen. 20, 13–21.

Arnold W, Beiglbock C, Burmester M, Guschlbauer M, Lengauer A, Schroder B, Wilkens M, Breves G (2015) Contrary seasonal changes of rates of nutrient uptake, organ mass, and voluntary food intake in red deer (Cervus elaphus). American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 309, R277–R285.
Contrary seasonal changes of rates of nutrient uptake, organ mass, and voluntary food intake in red deer (Cervus elaphus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26017492PubMed |

Aulak W, Babinska-Werka J (1990) Preference of different habitats and age classes of forest by roe deer. Acta Theriologica 35, 289–298.
Preference of different habitats and age classes of forest by roe deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bauer J (2007) Rehwildfütterung und Waldschutz. Tierschutz in der Jagd. Bayerischer Landesjagdverband 16, 67–72.

Bauer J (2009) Wann Fütterung geboten ist. Jagd in Bayern 20–21.

Bauer J (2014) Füttern ohne Idiologie. Revierkurier 4–5.

Bauer J, Schwarz H (2017) Notzeit Es liegt in unseren Händen. Jagd in Bayern 16–17.

Bayern Av (1997) ‘Das jagdliche Vermächtnis von Herzog Albrecht von Bayern.’ (Paul Parey Zeitschriftenverlag GmbH & Co Kg: Singhofen, Germany)

Behrend A, Lechner-Doll M, Streich WJ, Clauss M (2004) Seasonal faecal excretion, gut fill, liquid and particle marker retention in mouflon Ovis ammon musimon, and a comparison with roe deer. Acta Theriologica 49, 503–515.
Seasonal faecal excretion, gut fill, liquid and particle marker retention in mouflon Ovis ammon musimon, and a comparison with roe deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bideau E, Gerard JF, Vincent JP, Maublanc ML (1993) Effects of age and sex on space occupation by European roe deer. Journal of Mammalogy 74, 745–751.
Effects of age and sex on space occupation by European roe deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Briedermann L, Dittrich G, Lockow K-W (1988) Rotwild Cervus elaphus L. In ‘Buch der Hege Band 1 Haarwild’. (Ed. H Stubbe) pp. 2–57. (Verlag Harri Deutsch: Thun, Franfurt am Main, Germany)

Bubenik A, Lochman J (1956) Futterverbrauch und Tagesrhythmus der Futteraufnahme bei Reh- und Rotwild. Zeitschrift fur Jagdwissenschaft 2, 112–118.

Bubenik AB (1984) ‘Ernährung, Verhalten und Umwelt des Schalenwildes.’ (BLV Verlagsgesellschaft: München, Germany)

Buchgraber K (2005) Nahrungsangebot für Rehwild auf Grünland- und Ackerflächen. In ‘11. Östereichische Jägertagung. Raumberg– Gumpenstein’, 15 and 16 February 2005. (Ed. HB-uFf Landwirtschaft) pp. 27–32. (Irdning, Austria)

Cederlund G (1983) Home range dynamics and habitat selection by roe deer in a boreal area in central Sweden. Acta Theriologica 28, 443–460.
Home range dynamics and habitat selection by roe deer in a boreal area in central Sweden.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cederlung G, Nyström A (1981) Seasonal differences between moose and roe deer in ability to digest browse. Holarctic Ecology 4, 59–65.

Clauss M, Hume ID, Hummel J (2010) Evolutionary adaptions of ruminants and their potential relevance for modern production systems. Animal Behaviour 4, 979–992.

Dahl S-A, Hudler M, Windisch W, Bolduan C, Brugger D, König A (2020) High fibre selection by roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): evidence of ruminal microbiome adaptation to seasonal and geographical differences in the nutrient composition. Animal Production Science.
High fibre selection by roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): evidence of ruminal microbiome adaptation to seasonal and geographical differences in the nutrient composition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Deutsch A, Lechner-Doll M, Wolf G (1998) Activity of cellulolytic enzymes in the contents of reticulorumen and caecolon of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Comperative Biochemistry and Physiology. Part A 119, 925–930.
Activity of cellulolytic enzymes in the contents of reticulorumen and caecolon of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Diezel CE (1921) ‘Erfahrungen aus dem Gebiete der Niederjagd.’ (Kosmoas: Stuttgart, Germany)

Dissen J, Hartfiel W (1985) Beobachtungen zum Äsungsverhalten sowie Untersuchungen zur Nährstoffverdaulichkeit von Rehwild. Zeitschrift fur Jagdwissenschaft 31, 83–91.

Djordjevic N, Popovic Z, Grubic G (2006) Chemical composition of the rumen contents in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) as potetial quality indicator of their feeding. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 51, 133–140.
Chemical composition of the rumen contents in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) as potetial quality indicator of their feeding.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Drescher-Kaden U (1976) Untersuchungen am Verdauungstrakt von Reh, Damhirsch und Mufflon Mitteilungen 1: Gewichtserhebungen und Kapazitätsmessungen am Verdauungstrakt, insbesondere am Pansen-Haubenraum von Reh, Damhirsch und Mufflon. Zeitschrift fur Jagdwissenschaft 22, 184–190.

Drescher-Kaden U (1984) Stellung des Rehs im System der Wiederkäuer. In ‘Rehwild Biologie, Hege. Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald’. (Ed. BSf ELF) (Bay STMELF: München, Germany)

Drescher-Kaden U, Seifelnasr EA (1977a) Untersuchungen am Verdauungstrakt von Reh, Damhirsch und Mufflon. Mitteilungen 3: Mikroorganismen im Pansen von Reh, Damhirsch und Mufflon. Zeitschrift fur Jagdwissenschaft 23, 64–69.

Drescher-Kaden U, Seifelnasr EA (1977b) Untersuchungen zum Verdauungstrakt von Rehwild, Damwild und Mufflon. Mitteilung 2: Rohnährstoffe im Panseninhalt von Reh, Damhirsch und Mufflon. Zeitschrift fur Jagdwissenschaft 23, 6–11.

Drożdż A (1979) Seasonal intake and digestbility of natural foods by roe-deer. Acta Theriologica 24, 137–170.
Seasonal intake and digestbility of natural foods by roe-deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Drożdż A, Osiecki A (1973) Intake and digestibility of natural feeds by roe-deer. Acta Theriologica 18, 81–91.
Intake and digestibility of natural feeds by roe-deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Duncan P, Tixier H, Hofmann RR, Lechner-Doll M (1998) Feeding strategies and the physiology of digestion in roe deer. In ‘The European roe deer: the biology of success’. (Eds R Andersen, P Duncan, JDC Linnell) pp. 91–116. (Scandinavian University Press: Oslo, Norway)

Eisfeld D (1974) Der Proteinbedarf dew Rehes (Capreolus capreolus L.) zur Erhaltung. Zeitschrift fur Jagdwissenschaft 20, 43–48.

Eisfeld D (1984) Nahrungsbedarf des Rehwildes. In ‘Rehwild Biologie, Hege. Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald’. (Ed. BSf ELF) pp. 36–40. (Bay STMELF: München, Germany)

Ellenberg H (1975) Wilddichte, Ernährung und Vermehrung beim Reh. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie 1974, 59–76.

Ellenberg H (1978) Zur Populationsökologie des Rehes in Mitteleuropa. Spixiana.

Esser W (1957) Beitrag zur Untersuchung der Äsung des Rehwildes. Zeitschrift fur Jagdwissenschaft 3, 1–40.

Forstverwaltung B (2015) ‘Forstliches Gutachten zur Situation der Waldverjüngung 2015. Ergebnis Hegegemeinschaft.’ (Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten, München, Germany)

Geist V (1999) ‘Deer of the world. Their evolution, behaviour, and ecology.’ (Swan Hill Press: Shrewsbury, UK)

Giger-Reverdin S, Maaroufi C, Bontems V, Jousse C (1998) Interest and limits of the HFT method to evaluate the energy value of compound feeds for small ruminants. Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes 52, 39–42.

Hartfiel W, Pheiffer J, Dissen J (1985) Energetische Untersuchungen an Reh und Schaf mit Hilfe der quantitativen Thermographie zur Beurteilung des Energiebedarfs im Winter. Zeitschrift fur Jagdwissenschaft 31, 34–41.

Helm G (2015) Ernteschock und Verbiss. Volle Silos, leere Mägen. Jagd in Bayern 16–17.

Hofmann RR (1978) Die Ernährung des Rehwildes im Jahresablauf nach dem Modell Weichselboden. In ‘Wildbiologische Informationen für den Jäger Jagd + Hege Ausbildungsbuch II’. (Ed. RR Hofmann) pp. 121–136. (Ferdinand Enke Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany)

Hofmann RR (1982a) Die Stellung der europäischen Wildwiederkäuer im System der Äsungstypen. In ‘Wildbiologische Informationen für den Jäger. Jagd + Hege - Ausbildungsbuch I’. (Ed. RR Hofmann) pp. 9–18. (Ferdinand Enke Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany)

Hofmann RR (1982b) Die Verdauungsorgane des Rehes und ihre Anpassung an die besondere Ernährungsweise. In ‘Wildbiologische Informationen für den Jäger. Vol. I’. (Ed. RR Hofmann) pp. 103–126. (Ferdinand Enke Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany)

Hofmann RR (1989) Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaption and diversification of ruminants: a comperative view if their digestives system. Oecologia 78, 443–457.
Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaption and diversification of ruminants: a comperative view if their digestives system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28312172PubMed |

Hofmann RR, Kirsten N (1982) ‘Die Herbstmast: Simulation.’ (Stuttgart, Germany)

Holand O (1994) Seasonal dynamics of digestion in relation to diet quality and intake in European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Oecologia 98, 274–279.
Seasonal dynamics of digestion in relation to diet quality and intake in European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28313903PubMed |

Holand O, Mysterud A, Wannang A, Linnell JDC (1998) Roe deer in northern environments: physiology and behaviour. In ‘The European roe deer: the biology of success’. (Eds R Andersen, P Duncan, JDC Linnell) pp. 117–138. (Scandinavian University Press: Oslo, Norway)

Hummel J, Südekum KH, Streich WJ, Clauss M (2006) Forage fermentation patterns and their implications for herbivore ingesta retention times. Functional ecology 20, 989–1002.
Forage fermentation patterns and their implications for herbivore ingesta retention times.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jannsen J, Laatz W (2017) ‘Statistische Datenanalyse mit SPSS.’ (Springer Gabler: Berlin, Germany)

Kamphues J, Coenen M, Iben C, Kienzle E, Pallauf J, Simon O, Wanner M, Zentek J (Eds) (2009) ‘Supplement zur Vorlesung und Übung in der Tierernährung.’ (M. & H. Schaper: Hannover, Germany)

Klötzli F (1965) ‘Qualität und Quantität der Rehäsung.’ (ETH Zürich: Zurich, Switzerland)

König A, Scheingraber M, Mitschke J (2016) ‘Energiegehalt und Qualität der Nahrung von Rehen (Capreolus capreolus) im Jahresverlauf in zwei unterschiedlich geprägten Habitaten.’ (Zentrum Wald Forst Holz: Freising, Germany)

Lechner I, Barboza P, Collins W, Günther D, Hattendorf B, Hummel J, Clauss M (2009) No ‚bypass’ in adult ruminants: passage of fluid ingested vs. fluid inserted into the rumen in fistulates muskoxen (Ovisbos moschatus), reeindeer (Rangifer tarandus) and moose (Alces alces). Comperative Biochemistry and Physiology. Part A 154, 151–156.
No ‚bypass’ in adult ruminants: passage of fluid ingested vs. fluid inserted into the rumen in fistulates muskoxen (Ovisbos moschatus), reeindeer (Rangifer tarandus) and moose (Alces alces).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Linnell JDC, Duncan P, Andersen R (1998) The European roe deer: a porttait of a successful species. In ‘The European roe deer: the biology of success’. (Eds R Andersen, P Duncan, JDC Linnell) pp. 11–22. (Scandinavian University Press: Oslo, Norway)

Lozan JL (1992) ‘Angewandte Statistik für Naturwissenschaftler.’ (Verlag Paul Parey: Berlin, Germany)

Mancinelli S, Peters W, Boitani L, Hebblewhite M, Cagnacci F (2015) Roe deer summer habitat selection at multiple spatio-temporal scales in an Alpine environment. Hystrix 92,
Roe deer summer habitat selection at multiple spatio-temporal scales in an Alpine environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Marchand P, Redjadj C, Garel M, Cugnasse J-M, Maillard D, Loison A (2013) Are mouflon (Ovis gmelini musimon) really grazers? A review of variation in diet composition. Mammal Review 43, 275–291.
Are mouflon (Ovis gmelini musimon) really grazers? A review of variation in diet composition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mauget C, Mauget R, Sempéré A (1997) Metabolic rate in female European roe deer. Canadian Journal of Zoology 75, 731–739.
Metabolic rate in female European roe deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Menke KH, Steingass H (1988) Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development 28, 7–55.

Obidzinski A, Miltko R, Bolibok L, Wajdzik M, Skubis J, Nasiadka P (2017) Variation of natural diet of free ranging mouflon affects their ruminal protozoa composition. Smaöö Ruminant Research 157, 57–64.
Variation of natural diet of free ranging mouflon affects their ruminal protozoa composition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Onderscheka K (1999) Das Rehwild: seine Ernährung und Fütterung. In ‘Rehwild in der Kulturlandschaft. Nürnberg. Vol. 7’, 19 and 20 March 1990. (Ed. J Reddemann) pp. 37–60. (Schriftenreihe des Landesjagdverbandes Bayern e.V.: München, Germany)

Onderscheka K, Jordan HR (1976) Einfluß der Jahreszeit, des Biotops und der Äsungskonkurrenz auf die botanische Zusammensetzung des Panseninhaltes beim Gams-, Reh-, Muffel- und Rotwild. Die Bodenkultur 27, 202–217.

Oslage HJ, Strothmann A (1988) Zum Energie- und Proteinbedarf von Rehwild. Zeitschrift fur Jagdwissenschaft 34, 164–181.

Perzanowski K (1978) The effect of winter food composition on roe-deer energy budget. Acta Theriologica 23, 451–467.
The effect of winter food composition on roe-deer energy budget.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Popovic Z, Djordjevic N, Djordjevic M, Grubic G, Stojanovic B (2009) Estimation of the quality of the nutrition of roe deer based on chemical composition of the rumen content. Acta Veterinaria 59, 653–663.
Estimation of the quality of the nutrition of roe deer based on chemical composition of the rumen content.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rehbinder C, Ciszuk P (1985) Supplementary feeding of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) with late harvested hay. A pilot study. Rangifer 5, 6–14.
Supplementary feeding of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) with late harvested hay. A pilot study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Robbins CT, Spalinger DE, Hoven Wv (1995) Adaptation of ruminants to browse and grass diets: are anatomical based browser–grazer interpretations valid? Oecologia 103, 208–213.
Adaptation of ruminants to browse and grass diets: are anatomical based browser–grazer interpretations valid?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28306775PubMed |

Rowell-Schäfer A, Lechner-Doll M, Hofmann RR, Streich WJ, Güvern B, Meyer HHD (2001) Metabolic evidence of a rumen bypass or a ruminal escape of nutrients in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Comperative Biochemistry and Physiology. Part A 128, 289–298.
Metabolic evidence of a rumen bypass or a ruminal escape of nutrients in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schmidl C (1996) Botanische und chemische Panseninhaltsanalysen, chemische Blutuntersuchungen und Untersuchungen der Schwermetallbelastung beim Rehwild. Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien, Austria.

Sempere AJ, Sokolov VE, Danilkin AA (1996) Capreolus capreolus. Mammalian Species 538, 1–9.
Capreolus capreolus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Serrano Ferron E, Verheyden H, Hummel J, Cargnelutti B, Lourtet B, Merlet J, Gonzales-Candela M, Angibault JM, Hewison AJM, Clauss M (2012) Digestive plasticity as a response to woodland fragmentation in roe deer. Ecological Research 27, 77–82.

Silver H, Holter JB, Colovos NF, Hayes HH (1971) Effect of falling temperature on heat production in fasting white-tailed deer. The Journal of Wildlife Management 35, 37–46.
Effect of falling temperature on heat production in fasting white-tailed deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sommer A (2004) Stoffwechsel der Wildwiederkäuer. In ‘Tagung für die Jägerschaft. Raumberg–Gumpenstein’. (Ed. BfaL Gumpenstein) pp. 3–6. (Irdning, Austria)

Sommer A, Vodnansky M, Petrikovic P, Pozgaj R (2005) Influence of lucerne and meadow hay quality on the digestibility of nutrients in the roe deer. Czech Journal of Animal Science 2, 74–80.

Storms D, Aubry P, Hamann J-L, Saïd S, Fritz H, Saint-Andrieux C, Klein F (2008) Seasonal variation in diet composition and similarity of sympatric red deer Cervus elaphus and roe deer Capreolus capreolus. Wildlife Biology 14, 237–250.
Seasonal variation in diet composition and similarity of sympatric red deer Cervus elaphus and roe deer Capreolus capreolus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stubbe C (1997) ‘Das Rehwild [the roe deer].’ (Parey Buchverlag: Berlin, Germany)

Ueckermann E (1986) ‘Die Fütterung des Schalenwildes.’ (Verlag Paul Parey: Hamburg, Germany)

Weiner J (1977) Energy metabolism of the roe deer. Acta Theriologica 22, 3–24.
Energy metabolism of the roe deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wölfel H (2005) Biologie des Rehwildes und Konsequenzen für die jagdliche Praxis. oder: Das Reh ist kein Ungeziefer und der Jäger kein Schädlingsbekämpfer. In ‘11. Österreichische Jäger Tagung. Gumpenstein. Vol. 11’. (Ed. HB-uFf Landwirtschaft) pp. 5–8. (BAL: Irdning, Austria)

Woodall PF (1992) An evolution of a rapid method for estimating digestibility. African Journal of Ecology 30, 181–185.
An evolution of a rapid method for estimating digestibility.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |