Stocktake Sale on now: wide range of books at up to 70% off!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Automated feeding of sheep. 2. Feeding behaviour influences the methane emissions of sheep offered restricted diets

S. K. Muir https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5790-0446 A * , R. Behrendt https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2545-4482 A , M. Moniruzzaman B , G. Kearney C and M. I. Knight A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Agriculture Victoria, 915 Mount Napier Road, Hamilton, Vic. 3300, Australia.

B Department of Animal Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh.

C 36 Paynes Road, Hamilton, Vic. 3300, Australia.


Handling Editor: Dean Thomas

Animal Production Science 62(1) 55-66 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN20634
Submitted: 12 March 2020  Accepted: 27 July 2021   Published: 5 November 2021

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context: During the non-growing season of pastures and during droughts, the dry-matter intake (DMI) of sheep is often constrained due to low pasture availability and the need to feed for weight loss or maintenance. Below-maintenance feeding may have consequences for methane (CH4) production and yield in farm systems.

Aims: The effect of six restricted feeding levels on CH4 emissions measured using portable accumulation chambers (PACs) was examined in relation to DMI, oxygen consumption (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and observed changes in feeding behaviour in sheep fed with automated feeders.

Methods: An automated feeding system was used to apply daily feeding levels to Maternal Composite ewes (n = 126). Sheep were adapted to the automated feeding system over 19 days, with unlimited access to feed. Following adaptation, sheep were allocated to restricted daily feed levels at 40%, 80%, 100%, 140% and 180% of estimated maintenance requirements (MR) for 41 days. Methane, CO2 and O2 emissions from ewes were measured using PACs on Days 30 and 31 of the restricted feeding period.

Key results: Methane production (g/day) increased (P < 0.001) with the level of feeding. However, time since the last meal decreased with the level of feeding and was associated with CH4 production. Sheep on lower levels of feeding tended to consume meals earlier in the day and had longer times since their last meal at PAC measurement and lower CH4 production. These two factors explained 58.7% of the variance in CH4 production in an additive linear model. Methane yield (g CH4/kg DMI) decreased as the level of feeding was increased.

Conclusions: Methane emissions were affected not only by daily DMI, but also time since the last meal. An understanding of the effect of feeding behaviour and time since the last meal should be incorporated into feeding protocols prior to CH4 measurements when PACs are being used to measure CH4 emissions from sheep fed restricted diets.

Implications: Utilising automated feeders may improve the accuracy of PAC measurements of sheep CH4 emissions fed both ad libitum and restricted feed amounts, by increasing understanding of DMI and feeding behaviour.

Keywords: automated feeding, dry-matter intake, feed intake, feeding behaviour, greenhouse gas emissions, maintenance requirements, methane, portable accumulation chambers.


References

Behrendt R, Muir SK, Moniruzzaman M, Kearney G, Knight MI (2021) Automated feeding of sheep. 1. Changes in feeding behaviour in response to restricted and ad libitum feeding. Animal Production Science 61, 246–255.
Automated feeding of sheep. 1. Changes in feeding behaviour in response to restricted and ad libitum feeding.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Biswas A, Jonker A (2019) Circadian variation in methane emissions by sheep fed ryegrass-based pasture. In ‘Proceedings of the 70th annual meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science’, Ghent, Belgium, 26–30 August 2019. (EAAP [European Federation of Animal Science]: Rome, Italy)

Blaxter K, Clapperton J (1965) Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. British Journal of Nutrition 19, 511–522.
Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bond JJ, Cameron M, Donaldson AJ, Austin KL, Harden S, Robinson DL, Oddy VH (2019) Aspects of digestive function in sheep related to phenotypic variation in methane emissions. Animal Production Science 59, 55–65.
Aspects of digestive function in sheep related to phenotypic variation in methane emissions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Carter RR, Allen OB, Grovum WL (1990) The effect of feeding frequency and meal size on amounts of total and parotid saliva secreted by sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 63, 305–318.
The effect of feeding frequency and meal size on amounts of total and parotid saliva secreted by sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

CSIRO (1990) ‘Feeding standards for Australian livestock. Ruminants.’ (Standing Committee on Agriculture, CSIRO: Melbourne, Vic., Australia)

CSIRO (2012) ME required CSIRO plant industry. Available at https://grazplan.csiro.au/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/ME_Required.xls. [Accessed 27 July 2020]

Dominik S, Robinson DL, Donaldson AJ, Cameron M, Austin KL, Oddy VH (2017) Relationship between feed intake, energy expenditure and methane emissions: implications for genetic evaluation. In ‘Proceedings of the 22nd conference of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics (AAABG)’, Townsville, Qld, Australia, 2–5 July 2017, pp. 65–68. (Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and GeneticsArmidale: NSW, Australia)

Doyle PT, Egan JK, Thalen AJ (1982) Parotid saliva of sheep. 1. Effects of level of intake and type of roughage. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 33, 573–584.
Parotid saliva of sheep. 1. Effects of level of intake and type of roughage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Freer M, Moore AD, Donnelly JR (1997) GRAZPLAN: decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises—II. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS. Agricultural Systems 54, 77–126.
GRAZPLAN: decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises—II. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Goopy JP, Donaldson A, Hegarty R, Vercoe PE, Haynes F, Barnett M, Oddy VH (2014) Low-methane yield sheep have smaller rumens and shorter rumen retention time. British Journal of Nutrition 111, 578–585.

Goopy JP, Korir D, Pelster D, Ali AIM, Wassie SE, Schlecht E, Dickhoefer U, Merbold L, Butterbach-Bahl K (2020) Severe below-maintenance feed intake increased methane yield from enteric fermentation in cattle. British Journal of Nutrition 123, 1239–1246.
Severe below-maintenance feed intake increased methane yield from enteric fermentation in cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Goopy JP, Robinson DL, Woodgate RT, Donaldson AJ, Oddy VH, Vercoe PE, Hegarty RS (2016) Estimates of repeatability and heritability of methane production in sheep using portable accumulation chambers. Animal Production Science 56, 116–122.
Estimates of repeatability and heritability of methane production in sheep using portable accumulation chambers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Goopy JP, Woodgate R, Donaldson A, Robinson DL, Hegarty RS (2011) Validation of a short-term methane measurement using portable static chambers to estimate daily methane production in sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 219–226.
Validation of a short-term methane measurement using portable static chambers to estimate daily methane production in sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hammond KJ, Burke JL, Koolaard JP, Muetzel S, Pinares-Patino CS, Waghorn GC (2013) Effects of feed intake on enteric methane emissions from sheep fed fresh white clover (Trifolium repens) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) forages. Animal Feed Science and Technology 179, 121–132.
Effects of feed intake on enteric methane emissions from sheep fed fresh white clover (Trifolium repens) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) forages.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hegarty RS (2013) Applicability of short-term emission measurements for on-farm quantification of enteric methane. Animal 7, 401–408.
Applicability of short-term emission measurements for on-farm quantification of enteric methane.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23739481PubMed |

Hironaka R, Mathison GW, Kerrigan BK, Vlach I (1996) The effect of pelleting of alfalfa hay on methane production and digestibility by steers. Science of the Total Environment 180, 221–227.
The effect of pelleting of alfalfa hay on methane production and digestibility by steers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jefferies BC (1961) Body condition scoring and its use in management. Tasmanian Journal of Agriculture 32, 19–21.

Johnson KA, Westberg HH, Lamb BK, Kincaid RL (1998) The use of sulfur hexafluoride for measuring methane production by cattle. In ‘Energy metabolism of farm animals’. (Eds KJ McCracken, EF Unsworth, ARG Wylie) pp. 189–192. (CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK)

Jonker A, Hickey S, McEwan JC, Rowe S, Aharoni Y, Molano G, Sandoval E, Bain W, Elmes S, Dodds KG, MacLean S, Knowler K, Bryson B, Pinares-Patino CS (2018a) Rumen characteristics and total tract digestibility in low and high methane yield selection line sheep offered fresh good or poor quality pasture. Proceedings of the world congress on genetics applied to livestock production 11, 366

Jonker A, Hickey S, McEwan JC, Waghorn GC (2020) Portable accumulation chambers for enteric methane determination in sheep. In ‘Guideline for estimating methane emissions from individual ruminants using: GreenFeed, sniffers, hand-held laser detector and portable accumulation chambers’. (Eds A Jonker, GC Waghorn) pp. 49–56. (New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre: Palmerston North, New Zealand)

Jonker A, Hickey SM, Rowe SJ, Janssen PH, Shackell GH, Elmes S, Bain WE, Wing J, Greer GJ, Bryson B, MacLean S, Dodds KG, Pinares-Patino CS, Young EA, Knowler K, Pickering NK, McEwan JC (2018b) Genetic parameters of methane emissions determined using portable accumulation chambers in lambs and ewes grazing pasture and genetic correlations with emissions determined in respiration chambers. Journal of Animal Science 96, 3031–3042.
Genetic parameters of methane emissions determined using portable accumulation chambers in lambs and ewes grazing pasture and genetic correlations with emissions determined in respiration chambers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29741677PubMed |

Jonker A, Waghorn GC (2020) An overview of ‘spot sampling’ procedures to estimate enteric methane emissions from individual ruminants. In ‘Guideline for estimating methane emissions from individual ruminants using: GreenFeed, sniffers, hand-held laser detector and portable accumulation chambers’. (Eds A Jonker, GC Waghorn) pp. 3–8. (New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre: Palmerston North, New Zealand)

Mathers JC, Walters DE (1982) Variation in methane production by sheep fed every two hours. The Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge) 98, 633–638.
Variation in methane production by sheep fed every two hours.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Muir SK, Kennedy AJ, Kearney G, Hutton P, Thompson AN, Vercoe P, Hill J (2020c) Offering subterranean clover can reduce methane emissions compared with perennial ryegrass pastures during late spring and summer in sheep. Animal Production Science 60, 1449–1458.
Offering subterranean clover can reduce methane emissions compared with perennial ryegrass pastures during late spring and summer in sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Muir SK, Linden N, Knight M, Behrendt R, Kearney G (2018) Sheep residual feed intake and feeding behaviour: are ‘nibblers’ or ‘binge eaters’ more efficient? Animal Production Science 58, 1459–1464.
Sheep residual feed intake and feeding behaviour: are ‘nibblers’ or ‘binge eaters’ more efficient?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Muir SK, Linden NP, Kennedy A, Calder G, Kearney G, Roberts R, Knight MI, Behrendt R (2020a) Technical note: Validation of an automated feeding system for measuring individual animal feed intake in sheep housed in groups. Translational Animal Science 4, 1006–1016.

Muir SK, Linden NP, Kennedy A, Knight MI, Paganoni B, Kearney G, Thompson AN, Behrendt R (2020b) Correlations between feed intake, residual feed intake and methane emissions in maternal composite ewes at post weaning, hogget and adult ages. Small Ruminant Research 192, 106241
Correlations between feed intake, residual feed intake and methane emissions in maternal composite ewes at post weaning, hogget and adult ages.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

National Health and Medical Research Council (2013) ‘Australian code of practice for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes’, 8th edn. (Australian Government: Canberra, Australia)

Paganoni B, Rose G, Macleay C, Jones C, Brown DJ, Kearney G, Ferguson M, Thompson AN (2017) More feed efficient sheep produce less methane and carbon dioxide when eating high-quality pellets. Journal of Animal Science 95, 3839–3850.
More feed efficient sheep produce less methane and carbon dioxide when eating high-quality pellets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28992015PubMed |

Pelchen A, Peters KJ (1998) Methane emissions from sheep. Small Ruminant Research 27, 137–150.
Methane emissions from sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pickering NK, Oddy VH, Basarab J, Cammack K, Hayes B, Hegarty RS, Lassen J, McEwan JC, Miller S, Pinares-Patino CS, de Haas Y (2015) Animal board invited review: genetic possibilities to reduce enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Animal 9, 1431–1440.
Animal board invited review: genetic possibilities to reduce enteric methane emissions from ruminants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26055577PubMed |

Pinares-Patino CS, Ebrahimi SH, McEwan JC, Dodds KG, Clark H, Luo D (2011) Is rumen retention time implicated in sheep differences in methane emissions. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 71, 219–222.

Poppi DP, Minson DJ, Ternouth JH (1981) Studies of cattle and sheep eating leaf and stem fractions of grasses. 3. The retention time in the rumen of large feed particles. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 123–137.
Studies of cattle and sheep eating leaf and stem fractions of grasses. 3. The retention time in the rumen of large feed particles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Robinson DL, Cameron M, Donaldson AJ, Dominik S, Oddy VH (2016) One-hour portable methane measurements are repeatable and provide useful information on feed intake and efficiency. Journal of Animal Science 94, 4376–4387.

Robinson DL, Dominik S, Donaldson AJ, Oddy VH (2020) Repeatabilities, heritabilities and correlations of methane and feed intake of sheep in respiration and portable chambers. Animal Production Science 60, 880–892.
Repeatabilities, heritabilities and correlations of methane and feed intake of sheep in respiration and portable chambers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Robinson DL, Goopy JP, Hegarty RS, Oddy VH (2015) Comparison of repeated measurements of methane production in sheep over 5 years and a range of measurement protocols. Journal of Animal Science 93, 4637–4650.
Comparison of repeated measurements of methane production in sheep over 5 years and a range of measurement protocols.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26523556PubMed |

Russel AJF, Doney JM, Gunn RG (1969) Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. The Journal of Agricultural Science 72, 451–454.
Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Swainson N, Muetzel S, Clark H (2018) Updated predictions of enteric methane emissions from sheep suitable for use in the New Zealand national greenhouse gas inventory. Animal Production Science 58, 973–979.
Updated predictions of enteric methane emissions from sheep suitable for use in the New Zealand national greenhouse gas inventory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ulyatt MJ, Lassey KR, Shelton ID, Walker CF (2005) Methane emission from sheep grazing four pastures in late summer in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 48, 385–390.
Methane emission from sheep grazing four pastures in late summer in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van Burgel AJ, Oldham CM, Behrendt R, Curnow M, Gordon DJ, Thompson AN (2011) The merit of condition score and fat score as alternatives to liveweight for managing the nutrition of ewes. Animal Production Science 51, 834–841.
The merit of condition score and fat score as alternatives to liveweight for managing the nutrition of ewes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yurtseven S, Ozturk I (2009) Influence of two sources of cereals (corn or barley) in free choice feeding on diet selection, milk production indices and gaseous products (CH4 and CO2) in lactating sheep. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 4, 76–85.
Influence of two sources of cereals (corn or barley) in free choice feeding on diet selection, milk production indices and gaseous products (CH4 and CO2) in lactating sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |