Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The role of animal welfare in improving the future of farming

Rebecca E. Doyle https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6229-4700 A B * , Angus J. D. Campbell https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3907-5048 C , Michel Dione D , Madeleine Woodruff E , Carolina Munoz E , Gezahegn Alemayehu B , Tsega Berhe B and Theo Knight-Jones B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A The Jeanne Marchig International Centre for Animal Welfare Education, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Roslin, UK.

B International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

C Nossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.

D ILRI, Dakar, Senegal.

E Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.

* Correspondence to: rebecca.doyle@ed.ac.uk

Handling Editor: Cara Wilson

Animal Production Science - https://doi.org/10.1071/AN21562
Submitted: 6 November 2021  Accepted: 7 March 2022   Published online: 26 May 2022

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context: Animal production plays a critical role in many global challenges around sustainability, including climate change and resilience, One Health and food security. With this role comes pressures on livestock welfare.

Aims: This paper demonstrates key contributions animal welfare makes to global sustainability challenges.

Methods: This paper highlights ‘win–win’ improvements for both animal welfare and other aspects of sustainability by using the following four case studies: tail docking Australian sheep, agroforestry systems in Ethiopia, the Australian dairy-beef industry, and strategic feeding of goats in Pakistan.

Key results: These case studies show how animal welfare can be improved alongside livelihoods. However, even in these win–win situations, the adoption of improved practices is not guaranteed.

Conclusions: Long-term, sustained change in animal welfare can simultaneously make in roads to other challenges around sustainability. To do this, we must have a broader understanding of the system in which the animals are raised, so that barriers to change can be identified.

Implications: Lessons from these case studies can be applied to other production contexts and challenges, highlighting the universal value of understanding and addressing animal welfare.

Keywords: affective state, agroforestry, dairy, goat, sheep, silvopastoral systems, sustainable development goals, sustainable intensification.


References

Alders RG, Campbell A, Costa R, Guèye EF, Ahasanul Hoque M, Perezgrovas-Garza R, Rota A, Wingett K (2021) Livestock across the world: diverse animal species with complex roles in human societies and ecosystem services. Animal Frontiers 11, 20–29.
Livestock across the world: diverse animal species with complex roles in human societies and ecosystem services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 34676136PubMed |

Alemayehu G, Berhe T, Gelan E, Mokria M, Doyle R (2021) Silvopastoralism and welfare of farmed animals in Ethiopia. (CGSpace: a Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs) Available at https://hdl.handle.net/10568/115312

Baxter EM, Lawrence AB, Edwards SA (2012) Alternative farrowing accommodation: welfare and economic aspects of existing farrowing and lactation systems for pigs. Animal 6, 96–117.
Alternative farrowing accommodation: welfare and economic aspects of existing farrowing and lactation systems for pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22436159PubMed |

Berhe T, Alemayehu G, Mokria M, Schelling E, Ismail Z, Belay K, Mekonnen M, Wieland B (2021a) Agroforestry systems that benefit animal welfare, environmental well-being and livelihoods in Ethiopia. In ‘One Welfare World Conference; virtual conference’, 15–16 September 2021.

Berhe T, Mekonnen M, Doyle R, Wieland B, Mokria M, Njamba H, Alemayehu G (2021b) ‘Synergies of Animal Welfare and Agroforestry (SAWA): field research manual.’ (CGSpace: a Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs) Available at https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114312

Bolton SE, von Keyserlingk MAG (2021) The dispensable surplus dairy calf: is this issue a ‘Wicked Problem’ and where do we go from here? Frontiers in Veterinary Science 8, 660934
The dispensable surplus dairy calf: is this issue a ‘Wicked Problem’ and where do we go from here?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33937380PubMed |

Danbury TC, Weeks CA, Waterman-Pearson AE, Kestin SC, Chambers JP (2000) Self-selection of the analgesic drug carprofen by lame broiler chickens. Veterinary Record 146, 307–311.
Self-selection of the analgesic drug carprofen by lame broiler chickens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10766114PubMed |

Doyle RE (2018) Assessing and addressing on-farm sheep welfare. Available at https://www.mla.com.au/research-and-development/search-rd-reports/final-report-details/Assessing-and-Addressing-On-Farm-Sheep-Welfare/3712

Doyle RE, Alders R (2021) The role of One Welfare in development and nutrition security. In ‘One Welfare in practice: the role of the veterinarian’. pp. 205–231 (Ed. T Stephens) (CRC Press: Oxon, UK)

Doyle RE, Fisher AD, Hinch GN, Boissy A, Lee C (2010) Release from restraint generates a positive judgement bias in sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 122, 28–34.
Release from restraint generates a positive judgement bias in sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dudink S, Simonse H, Marks I, de Jonge FH, Spruijt BM (2006) Announcing the arrival of enrichment increases play behaviour and reduces weaning-stress-induced behaviours of piglets directly after weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 101, 86–101.
Announcing the arrival of enrichment increases play behaviour and reduces weaning-stress-induced behaviours of piglets directly after weaning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

FAO (2022) ‘FAOSTAT Statistical Database’ (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy)

Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (2016) FAO synthesis – livestock and the sustainable development goals global agenda for sustainable livestock. Available at http://www.livestockdialogue.org/fileadmin/templates/res_livestock/docs/2016/Panama/FAO-AGAL_synthesis_Panama_Livestock_and_SDGs.pdf

Garnett T, Appleby MC, Balmford A, Bateman IJ, Benton TG, Bloomer P, Burlingame B, Dawkins M, Dolan L, Fraser D, Herrero M, Hoffmann I, Smith P, Thornton PK, Toulmin C, Vermeulen SJ, Godfray HCJ (2013) Sustainable intensification in agriculture: premises and policies. Science 341, 33–34.
Sustainable intensification in agriculture: premises and policies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23828927PubMed |

Gill DA, Graham NPH (1939) Studies on fly strike in merino sheep. No. 2. Miscellaneous observations at ‘Dungalear’ on the influence of conformation of the tail and vulva in relation to ‘Crutch’ strike. Journal of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Australia 12, 71–82.

Johnstone IL (1944) The tailing of lambs: the relative importance of normal station procedures. Australian Veterinary Journal 20, 286–291.
The tailing of lambs: the relative importance of normal station procedures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lloyd J, Kessell A, Barchia I, Schröder J, Rutley D (2016) Docked tail length is a risk factor for bacterial arthritis in lambs. Small Ruminant Research 144, 17–22.
Docked tail length is a risk factor for bacterial arthritis in lambs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Makkar HPS (2012) Towards sustainable animal diets. In ‘Proceedings of the FAO symposium, Bangkok, Thailand’, Vol. 27. (Eds HPS Makkar, D Beever) pp. 67–74 (FAO and Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies: Rome, Italy)

Mellor DJ, Beausoleil NJ, Littlewood KE, McLean AN, McGreevy PD, Jones B, Wilkins C (2020) The 2020 five domains model: including human–animal interactions in assessments of animal welfare. Animals 10, 1870
The 2020 five domains model: including human–animal interactions in assessments of animal welfare.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Munoz C, Campbell A, Barber S, Hemsworth P, Doyle R (2018) Using longitudinal assessment on extensively managed ewes to quantify welfare compromise and risks. Animals 8, 8
Using longitudinal assessment on extensively managed ewes to quantify welfare compromise and risks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nair PKR (1991) State-of-the-art of agroforestry systems. Forest Ecology and Management 45, 5–29.
State-of-the-art of agroforestry systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nielsen SS, Houe H, Denwood M, Nielsen LR, Forkman B, Otten ND, Agger JF (2021) Application of methods to assess animal welfare and suffering caused by infectious diseases in cattle and swine populations. Animals 11, 3017
Application of methods to assess animal welfare and suffering caused by infectious diseases in cattle and swine populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 34827750PubMed |

OIE (2004) Terrestrial animal health code. Available at http://www.oie.int/standard-setting/terrestrial-code/access-online/

Pfuhl R, Bellmann O, Kühn C, Teuscher F, Ender K, Wegner J (2007) Beef versus dairy cattle: a comparison of feed conversion, carcass composition, and meat quality. Archives Animal Breeding 50, 59–70.
Beef versus dairy cattle: a comparison of feed conversion, carcass composition, and meat quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Roche JR, Friggens NC, Kay JK, Fisher MW, Stafford KJ, Berry DP (2009) Invited review: Body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 5769–5801.
Invited review: Body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19923585PubMed |

Thomas DL, Waldron DF, Lowe GD, Morrical DG, Meyer HH, High RA, Berger YM, Clevenger DD, Fogle GE, Gottfredson RG, Loerch SC, McClure KE, Willingham TD, Zartman DL, Zelinsky RD (2003) Length of docked tail and the incidence of rectal prolapse in lambs. Journal of Animal Science 81, 2725–2732.
Length of docked tail and the incidence of rectal prolapse in lambs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14601875PubMed |

Van Zanten HHE, Van Ittersum MK, De Boer IJM (2019) The role of farm animals in a circular food system. Global Food Security 21, 18–22.
The role of farm animals in a circular food system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vandegraaff R (1976) Squamous-cell carcinoma of the vulva in merino sheep. Australian Veterinary Journal 52, 21–23.
Squamous-cell carcinoma of the vulva in merino sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1267732PubMed |

Verdon M (2022) A review of factors affecting the welfare of dairy calves in pasture-based production systems. Animal Production Science 62, 1–20.
A review of factors affecting the welfare of dairy calves in pasture-based production systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, et al. (2019) Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet 393, 447–492.
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Woodruff ME, Doyle R, Coleman G, Hemsworth L, Munoz C (2020) Knowledge and attitudes are important factors in farmers’ choice of lamb tail docking length. Veterinary Record 186, 319–319.
Knowledge and attitudes are important factors in farmers’ choice of lamb tail docking length.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31959706PubMed |

Woodruff ME, Munoz C, Barber S, Coleman G, Doyle R (2021) Shear influence: the relationship between short tail docking in sheep and ease of shearing. In ‘Proceedings of the 8th international conference on the assessment of animal welfare at farm and group level’, Cork, Ireland. (Eds L Boyle, K O’Driscoll)