Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Skim-Nanopore sequencing for routine genomic evaluation and bacterial pathogen detection in cattle

H. J. Lamb https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2864-7685 A * , L. T. Nguyen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7783-5466 A , T. E. Briody https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9312-742X A , R. K. Ambrose B , B. J. Hayes https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5606-3970 A , T. J. Mahony https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4573-7906 A and E. M. Ross https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7521-3671 A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia.

B Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Animal Science, Agriscience Queensland, Dutton Park, Qld 4102, Australia.

* Correspondence to: harrison.lamb@uq.edu.au

Handling Editor: Sue Hatcher

Animal Production Science 63(11) 1074-1085 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN22451
Submitted: 12 December 2022  Accepted: 17 April 2023   Published: 25 May 2023

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Context: Genotyping-by-sequencing, the use of sequence reads to genotype single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), has seen an increase in popularity as a tool for genomic prediction. Oxford Nanopore Technologies (Nanopore) sequencing is an emerging technology that produces long sequence reads in real-time. Recent studies have established the ability for low-coverage Nanopore sequence data to be used for genomic prediction. However, the value proposition of Nanopore sequencing for individuals could be improved if both genotyping and disease diagnosis are achieved from a single sample.

Aims: This study aimed to demonstrate that Nanopore sequencing can be used for both rapid genotyping and as a disease diagnostic tool using the same sample in livestock.

Methods: Total DNA extracts from nasal swabs collected from 48 feedlot cattle presenting with clinical signs of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) were sequenced using the Nanopore PromethION sequencer. After 24 h of sequencing, genotypes were imputed and genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) for four traits were derived using 641 163 SNPs and corresponding SNP effects. These GEBVs were compared with GEBVs derived from SNP array genotypes and calculated using the same SNP effects. Unmapped sequence reads were classified into taxa using Kraken2 and compared with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) results for five BRD-associated pathogens of interest.

Key results: Sequence-derived genotypes for 46 of the 48 animals were produced in 24 h and GEBV correlations ranged between 0.92 and 0.94 for the four traits. Eleven different BRD-associated pathogens (two viruses and nine bacterial species) were detected in the samples using Nanopore sequence data. A significant (P < 0.001) relationship between Nanopore and qPCR results was observed for five overlapping species when a maximum threshold cycle was used.

Conclusions: The results of this study indicated that 46 cattle genomes can be multiplexed and accurately genotyped for downstream genomic prediction by using a single PromethION flow cell (ver. R9.4) in 24 h. This equates to a cost of AUD35.82 per sample for consumables. The concordance between qPCR results and pathogen proportion estimates also indicated that some pathogenic species, in particular bacterial species, can be accurately identified from the same test.

Implications: Using Nanopore sequencing, routine genotyping and disease detection in livestock could be combined into one cost-competitive test with a rapid turnaround time.

Keywords: bovine respiratory disease, feedlot cattle, genomics, genomic selection, genotyping-by-sequencing, Oxford Nanopore sequencing, pathogen diagnostics, rapid diagnostics.


References

Amarasinghe SL, Su S, Dong X, Zappia L, Ritchie ME, et al. (2020) Opportunities and challenges in long-read sequencing data analysis. Genome Biology 21, 30
Opportunities and challenges in long-read sequencing data analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Angelakis E, Bachar D, Henrissat B, Armougom F, Audoly G, et al. (2016) Glycans affect DNA extraction and induce substantial differences in gut metagenomic studies. Scientific Reports 6, 26276
Glycans affect DNA extraction and induce substantial differences in gut metagenomic studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barbé L, Schaeffer J, Besnard A, Jousse S, Wurtzer S, et al. (2022) SARS-CoV-2 whole-genome sequencing using oxford nanopore technology for variant monitoring in wastewaters. Frontiers in Microbiology 13, 889811
SARS-CoV-2 whole-genome sequencing using oxford nanopore technology for variant monitoring in wastewaters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chai J, Capik SF, Kegley B, Richeson JT, Powell JG (2022) Bovine Respiratory Microbiota of Feedlot Cattle and Its Association with Disease. Veterinary Research 53, 4
Bovine Respiratory Microbiota of Feedlot Cattle and Its Association with Disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, Marshall J, Ohan V, et al. (2021) Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience 10, giab008
Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Davey JW, Cezard T, Fuentes-Utrilla P, Eland C, Gharbi K, et al. (2013) Special features of RAD sequencing data: implications for genotyping. Molecular Ecology 22, 3151–3164.
Special features of RAD sequencing data: implications for genotyping.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Davies RW, Kucka M, Su D, Shi S, Flanagan M, et al. (2021) Rapid genotype imputation from sequence with reference panels. Nature Genetics 53, 1104–1111.
Rapid genotype imputation from sequence with reference panels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

De Donato M, Peters SO, Mitchell SE, Hussain T, Imumorin IG (2013) Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS): a novel, efficient and cost-effective genotyping method for cattle using next-generation sequencing. PLoS ONE 8, e62137
Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS): a novel, efficient and cost-effective genotyping method for cattle using next-generation sequencing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

De Roeck A, De Coster W, Bossaerts L, Cacace R, De Pooter T, et al. (2019) NanoSatellite: accurate characterization of expanded tandem repeat length and sequence through whole genome long-read sequencing on PromethION. Genome Biology 20, 239
NanoSatellite: accurate characterization of expanded tandem repeat length and sequence through whole genome long-read sequencing on PromethION.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Delahaye C, Nicolas J (2021) Sequencing DNA with nanopores: troubles and biases. PLoS ONE 16, e0257521
Sequencing DNA with nanopores: troubles and biases.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q, Poland JA, Kawamoto K, et al. (2011) A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS ONE 6, e19379
A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Emes D, Naylor N, Waage J, Knight G (2022) Quantifying the relationship between antibiotic use in food-producing animals and antibiotic resistance in humans. Antibiotics-Basel 11, 66
Quantifying the relationship between antibiotic use in food-producing animals and antibiotic resistance in humans.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Faria NR, Sabino EC, Nunes MRT, Alcantara LCJ, Loman NJ, et al. (2016) Mobile real-time surveillance of Zika virus in Brazil. Genome Medicine 8, 97
Mobile real-time surveillance of Zika virus in Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Freeman CN, Herman EK, Abi Younes J, Ramsay DE, Erikson N, et al. (2022) Evaluating the potential of third generation metagenomic sequencing for the detection of BRD pathogens and genetic determinants of antimicrobial resistance in chronically ill feedlot cattle. BMC Veterinary Research 18, 211
Evaluating the potential of third generation metagenomic sequencing for the detection of BRD pathogens and genetic determinants of antimicrobial resistance in chronically ill feedlot cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gardner SN, Thissen JB, McLoughlin KS, Slezak T, Jaing CJ (2013) Optimizing SNP microarray probe design for high accuracy microbial genotyping. Journal of Microbiological Methods 94, 303–310.
Optimizing SNP microarray probe design for high accuracy microbial genotyping.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hayes BJ, Daetwyler HD (2019) 1000 bull genomes project to map simple and complex genetic traits in cattle: applications and outcomes. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences 7, 89–102.
1000 bull genomes project to map simple and complex genetic traits in cattle: applications and outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hayes BJ, Fordyce G, Landmark S (2019) Genomic predictions for fertility traits in tropical beef cattle from a multi-breed, crossbred and composite reference population. In ‘Proceeding of the Association for the Advancment of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Armidale’. (Association for the Advancment of Animal Breeding and Genetics: Armidale, NSW). Available at http://www.aaabg.org/aaabghome/AAABG23papers/69Hayes23282.pdf

Hoenen T, Groseth A, Rosenke K, Fischer RJ, Hoenen A, et al. (2016) Nanopore sequencing as a rapidly deployable Ebola outbreak tool. Emerging Infectious Diseases 22, 331–334.
Nanopore sequencing as a rapidly deployable Ebola outbreak tool.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Horwood PF, Mahony TJ (2011) Multiplex real-time RT-PCR detection of three viruses associated with the bovine respiratory disease complex. Journal of Virological Methods 171, 360–363.
Multiplex real-time RT-PCR detection of three viruses associated with the bovine respiratory disease complex.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Huang X, Feng Q, Qian Q, Zhao Q, Wang L, et al. (2009) High-throughput genotyping by whole-genome resequencing. Genome Research 19, 1068–1076.
High-throughput genotyping by whole-genome resequencing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Huang X, Wei X, Sang T, Zhao Q, Feng Q, et al. (2010) Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nature Genetics 42, 961–967.
Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Katsumura T, Oda S, Mitani H, Oota H (2019) Medaka population genome structure and demographic history described via genotyping-by-sequencing. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 9, 217–228.
Medaka population genome structure and demographic history described via genotyping-by-sequencing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lamb HJ, Hayes BJ, Randhawa IAS, Nguyen LT, Ross EM (2021) Genomic prediction using low-coverage portable Nanopore sequencing. PLoS ONE 16, e0261274
Genomic prediction using low-coverage portable Nanopore sequencing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lamb HJ, Nguyen LT, Copley JP, Engle BN, Hayes BJ, et al. (2022) Imputation strategies for near real-time genomic prediction using nanopore sequencing. Research Square
Imputation strategies for near real-time genomic prediction using nanopore sequencing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Li H (2018) Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094–3100.
Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lu J, Breitwieser FP, Thielen P, Salzberg SL (2017) Bracken: estimating species abundance in metagenomics data. PeerJ Computer Science 3, e104
Bracken: estimating species abundance in metagenomics data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lu J, Rincon N, Wood DE, Breitwieser FP, Pockrandt C, et al. (2022) Metagenome analysis using the Kraken software suite. Nature Protocols 17, 2815–2839.
Metagenome analysis using the Kraken software suite.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ng TFF, Kondov NO, Deng X, Van Eenennaam A, Neibergs HL, et al. (2015) A metagenomics and case-control study to identify viruses associated with bovine respiratory disease. Journal of Virology 89, 5340–5349.
A metagenomics and case-control study to identify viruses associated with bovine respiratory disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ong CT, Ross EM, Boe-Hansen GB, Turni C, Hayes B, et al. (2022) Technical note: overcoming host contamination in bovine vaginal metagenomic samples with nanopore adaptive sequencing. Journal of Animal Science 100, skab344
Technical note: overcoming host contamination in bovine vaginal metagenomic samples with nanopore adaptive sequencing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Oxford Nanopore Technologies (2022) ‘Software Release 22.08.6 for Minion Mk1c.’ (Oxford Nanopore Technologies Community)

O’Donnell VK, Grau FR, Mayr GA, Sturgill Samayoa TL, Dodd KA, et al. (2019) Rapid sequence-based characterization of African swine fever virus by use of the oxford nanopore minION sequence sensing device and a companion analysis software tool. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 58, e01104-19
Rapid sequence-based characterization of African swine fever virus by use of the oxford nanopore minION sequence sensing device and a companion analysis software tool.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Patel SJ, Wellington M, Shah RM, Ferreira MJ (2020) Antibiotic stewardship in food-producing animals: challenges, progress, and opportunities. Clinical Therapeutics 42, 1649–1658.
Antibiotic stewardship in food-producing animals: challenges, progress, and opportunities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Poland JA, Rife TW (2012) Genotyping-by-sequencing for plant breeding and genetics. The Plant Genome 5, 92–102.
Genotyping-by-sequencing for plant breeding and genetics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Quick J, Loman NJ, Duraffour S, Simpson JT, Severi E, et al. (2016) Real-time, portable genome sequencing for Ebola surveillance. Nature 530, 228–232.
Real-time, portable genome sequencing for Ebola surveillance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rosen BD, Bickhart DM, Schnabel RD, Koren S, Elsik CG, et al. (2020) De novo assembly of the cattle reference genome with single-molecule sequencing. GigaScience 9, giaa021
De novo assembly of the cattle reference genome with single-molecule sequencing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sargolzaei M, Chesnais JP, Schenkel FS (2014) A new approach for efficient genotype imputation using information from relatives. BMC Genomics 15, 478
A new approach for efficient genotype imputation using information from relatives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Scheben A, Batley J, Edwards D (2017) Genotyping-by-sequencing approaches to characterize crop genomes: choosing the right tool for the right application. Plant Biotechnology Journal 15, 149–161.
Genotyping-by-sequencing approaches to characterize crop genomes: choosing the right tool for the right application.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sui H-Y, Weil AA, Nuwagira E, Qadri F, Ryan ET, et al. (2020) Impact of DNA extraction method on variation in human and built environment microbial community and functional profiles assessed by shotgun metagenomics sequencing. Frontiers in Microbiology 11, 953
Impact of DNA extraction method on variation in human and built environment microbial community and functional profiles assessed by shotgun metagenomics sequencing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tange O (2018) ‘GNU Parallel’. Available at https://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/

Teng J, Zhao C, Wang D, Chen Z, Tang H, et al. (2022) Assessment of the performance of different imputation methods for low-coverage sequencing in Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 105, 3355–3366.
Assessment of the performance of different imputation methods for low-coverage sequencing in Holstein cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Torkamaneh D, Laroche J, Belzile F (2016) Genome-wide SNP calling from genotyping by sequencing (GBS) data: a comparison of seven pipelines and two sequencing technologies. PLoS One 11, e0161333
Genome-wide SNP calling from genotyping by sequencing (GBS) data: a comparison of seven pipelines and two sequencing technologies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Torkamaneh D, Laroche J, Boyle B, Hyten DL, Belzile F (2021) A bumper crop of SNPs in soybean through high-density genotyping-by-sequencing (HD-GBS). Plant Biotechnology Journal 19, 860–862.
A bumper crop of SNPs in soybean through high-density genotyping-by-sequencing (HD-GBS).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tyler AD, Mataseje L, Urfano CJ, Schmidt L, Antonation KS, et al. (2018) Evaluation of oxford Nanopore’s minION sequencing device for microbial whole genome sequencing applications. Scientific Reports 8, 10931
Evaluation of oxford Nanopore’s minION sequencing device for microbial whole genome sequencing applications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wesolowska-Andersen A, Bahl MI, Carvalho V, Kristiansen K, Sicheritz-Ponten T, et al. (2014) Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis. Microbiome 2, 19
Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhang M, Hill JE, Fernando C, Alexander TW, Timsit E, et al. (2019) Respiratory viruses identified in western Canadian beef cattle by metagenomic sequencing and their association with bovine respiratory disease. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 66, 1379–1386.
Respiratory viruses identified in western Canadian beef cattle by metagenomic sequencing and their association with bovine respiratory disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |