Impact of tree integration in crop–livestock systems with varying nitrogen rates
Luiza de Souza Carneiro A , Luiza Chiezi Mendes A , Debora Rodrigues B , Vanderley Porfírio-da-Silva C and Laíse da Silveira Pontes
A
B
C
Abstract
The incorporation of trees into integrated crop–livestock systems (ICLS) has been encouraged because of their role in climate change mitigation through plant and soil carbon sequestration. One challenge is to minimize competition (especially for light) and the damage caused by cattle to trees.
This study sought to evaluate the performance of beef heifers grazing on cool-season grasses in two ICLS, crop–livestock (CL) and crop–livestock with immature Eucalyptus grandis trees (CLT), at two nitrogen (N) rates (50 and 150 kg/ha) on pasture. Because these were the first stocking seasons after tree planting, the physical impact of animals (e.g. debarking) on the trees was also evaluated.
The experimental design was randomized blocks with treatments arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial scheme (2 systems × 2 N fertilization rates), with three replicates. Forage production (as dry matter, DM) and animal performance were evaluated for 2 years.
Total forage production and liveweight (LW) gain per area over 117 days of grazing were on average higher for CL (6736 ± 565 kg DM/ha and 505 ± 58.6 kg LW/ha respectively) than for CLT (5455 ± 372 kg DM/ha and 364 ± 42.3 kg LW/ha), regardless of N rate, and even at similar sward heights (~24 cm). The damage caused by heifers to the bark of the trees was classified as high intensity in 91.1% of the trees, even after the trees had reached a diameter at breast height of 9.9 cm.
The interaction between livestock and trees was detrimental to the system’s productivity, affecting pasture growth, animal performance and the quality of trees as sawn wood. This finding underscores the importance of selecting appropriate tree species, plant density and species arrangement in ICLS.
Lower tree densities (<237 trees/ha) and preventive measures regarding the use of E. grandis in CLT systems with cool-season grasses are necessary in subtropical regions.
Keywords: agroforestry, beef heifers, black oat, Eucalyptus grandis, ryegrass, shading, silvopastoral system, trunk injury.
References
Aan A, Lõhmus K, Sellin A, Kull O (2014) Changes in light- and nitrogen-use and in aboveground biomass allocation patterns along productivity gradients in grasslands. Journal of Plant Research 127, 441-453.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Abraham EM, Kyriazopoulos AP, Parissi ZM, Kostopoulou P, Karatassiou M, Anjalanidou K, Katsouta C (2014) Growth, dry matter production, phenotypic plasticity, and nutritive value of three natural populations of Dactylis glomerata L. under various shading treatments. Agroforestry Systems 88, 287-299.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Aguinaga AAQ, Carvalho PCdF, Anghinoni I, Santos DTd, Freitas FKd, Lopes MT (2006) Production of beef steers grazing oat plus annual ryegrass pasture managed at different heights. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 35(4), 1765-1773.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Amorim HCS, Ashworth AJ, O’Brien PL, Thomas AL, Runkle BRK, Philipp D (2023) Temperate silvopastures provide greater ecosystem services than conventional pasture systems. Scientific Reports 13, 18658.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Anderson GW, Hawke M, Moore RW (1985) Pine needle consumption and bark stripping by sheep grazing annual pastures in young stands of widely spaced Pinus radiata and P. pinaster. Agroforestry Systems 3, 37-45.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Aschalew ND, Wang T, Qin G-X, Zhen Y-G, Zhang X-F, Chen X, Atiba EM, Seidu A (2020) Effects of physically effective fiber on rumen and milk parameters in dairy cows: a review. Indian Journal of Animal Research 54(11), 1317-1323.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Babola M, Pontes L da S, Moraes A de, Piano TGR, Molento MB, Molento CFM (2023) The influence of the silvopastoral system on physiological, behavior, and health responses of the Purunã breed of cattle. Archives of Veterinary Science 29, 1-12.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Balbinot Junior AA, Moraes Ad, Veiga Md, Pelissari A, Dieckow J (2009) Crop-livestock system: intensified use of agricultural lands. Ciência Rural 39(6), 1925-1933.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Belesky DP, Burner DM, Ruckle JM (2011) Tiller production in cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata) and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) growing along a light gradient. Grass and Forage Science 66, 370-380.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Berger K, Verrelst J, Féret J-B, Wang Z, Wocher M, Strathmann M, Danner M, Mauser W, Hank T (2020) Crop nitrogen monitoring: recent progress and principal developments in the context of imaging spectroscopy missions. Remote Sensing of Environment 242, 111758.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Berridge KC, Kringelbach ML (2008) Affective neuroscience of pleasure: reward in humans and animals. Psychopharmacology 199, 457-480.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Carvalho PC de F, Moraes A de, Pontes L da S, Anghinoni I, Sulc RM, Batello C (2014) Definitions and terminologies for Integrated Crop–Livestock System. Revista Ciência Agronômica 45(5spe), 1040-1046.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Da Silva SC, Sbrissia AF, Pereira LET (2015) Ecophysiology of C4 forage grasses – understanding plant growth for optimising their use and management. Agriculture 5(3), 598-625.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Deifeld FLC, Soares AB, Schmitt D, Assmann TS, Missio RL, Zatta AC, Mensor M, Candiotto L, Barriga PAB, Candiotto F (2021) Grazing height and nitrogen fertilization strategy in black oat/maize succession. Semina Ciências Agrárias 42(4), 2539-2554.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Dubeux JCB, Jr., Sollenberger LE, Mathews BW, Scholberg JM, Santos HQ (2007) Nutrient cycling in warm-climate grasslands. Crop Science 47, 915-928.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Farias GD, Dubeux JCB, Jr, Savian JV, Duarte LP, Martins AP, Tiecher T, Alves LA, de Faccio Carvalho PC, Bremm C (2020) Integrated crop–livestock system with system fertilization approach improves food production and resource-use efficiency in agricultural lands. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 40, 39.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ferreira FA, Milani D (2004) Evaluation of the resistance of Eucalyptus spp. clones naturally infected by Cryphonectria canker disease using a new methodology. Revista Árvore 28(2), 313-316.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ford MM, Zamora DS, Current D, Magner J, Wyatt G, Walter WD, Vaughan S (2019) Impact of managed woodland grazing on forage quantity, quality and livestock performance: the potential for silvopasture in central Minnesota, USA. Agroforestry Systems 93, 67-79.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gill RMA (1992) A review of damage by mammals in North Temperate Forests: 1. Deer. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research 65(2), 145-169.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gómez S, Guenni O, Bravo de Guenni L (2013) Growth, leaf photosynthesis and canopy light use efficiency under differing irradiance and soil N supplies in the forage grass Brachiaria decumbens Stapf. Grass and Forage Science 68, 395-407.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gregory NG (1995) The role of shelterbelts in protecting livestock: a review. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 38, 423-450.
| Google Scholar |
Guerreiro MF, Nicodemo MLF, Porfírio-da-Silva V (2015) Vulnerability of ten eucalyptus varieties to predation by cattle in a silvopastoral system. Agroforestry Systems 89, 743-749.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hirose T, Bazzaz FA (1998) Trade-off between light- and nitrogen-use efficiency in canopy photosynthesis. Annals of Botany 82(2), 195-202.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Jose S, Walter D, Mohan Kumar B (2019) Ecological considerations in sustainable silvopasture design and management. Agroforestry Systems 93, 317-331.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Klingman DL, Miles SR, Mott GO (1943) The cage method for determining consumption and yield of pasture herbage. Agronomy Journal 35(9), 739-746.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kolb P (2009) What is a tree? Available at https://www.montana.edu/extension/forestry/publications/fact-sheets/FF_What%20is%20a%20tree_PK.pdf [accessed 24 September 2024]
Komainda M, Sutterlütti R, Kayser M, Isselstein J (2024) Adjusting nitrogen fertilization to spatial variations in growth conditions in silvopastoral systems for improved nitrogen use efficiency. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 128, 397-409.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kunrath TR, Cadenazzi M, Brambilla DM, Anghinoni I, Moraes A de, Barro RS, Carvalho PC de F (2014) Management targets for continuously stocked mixed oat x annual ryegrass pasture in a no-till integrated crop-livestock system. European Journal of Agronomy 57, 71-76.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kunrath TR, Nunes PAdA, de Souza Filho W, Cadenazzi M, Bremm C, Martins AP, Carvalho PC de F (2020) Sward height determines pasture production and animal performance in a long-term soybean–beef cattle integrated system. Agricultural Systems 177, 102716.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lemaire G, Franzluebbers A, Carvalho PCdF, Dedieu B (2014) Integrated crop–livestock systems: strategies to achieve synergy between agricultural production and environmental quality. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 190, 4-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lemaire G, Garnier J, Pontes L da S, de Faccio Carvalho PC, Billen G, Simioni Assmann T (2023) Domestic herbivores, the crucial trophic level for sustainable agriculture: avenues for reconnecting livestock to cropping systems. Agronomy 13(4), 982.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lin CH, McGraw ML, George MF, Garrett HE (2001) Nutritive quality and morphological development under partial shade of some forage species with agroforestry potential. Agroforestry Systems 53, 269-281.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lopes MLT, Carvalho PCdF, Anghinoni I, Santos DTd, Kuss F, Freitas FKd, Flores JPC (2008) Crop-livestock integration system: performance and carcass quality of superprecoce beef steers finished in oat and ryegrass pasture managed under different heights. Ciência Rural 38(1), 178-184.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lopes LB, Eckstein C, Pina DS, Carnevalli RA (2016) The influence of trees on the thermal environment and behaviour of grazing heifers in Brazilian Midwest. Tropical Animal Health and Production 48, 755-761.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Maccari M, Simioni Assmann T, Bernardon A, Brugnara Soares A, Franzluebbers A, de Bortolli M, Brum de Bortolli B, Glienke CL (2021) Relationships between N, P, and K in corn biomass for assessing the carryover effects of winter pasture to corn. European Journal of Agronomy 129, 126317.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
McDowell LR (1996) Feeding minerals to cattle on pasture. Animal Feed Science and Technology 60(3-4), 247-271.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Medrado MJS, Porfírio-da-Silva V, Dereti RM, Fonseca LRd, Maier TF, Pinton ALM (2009) Danos provocados em eucalipto por bovinos criados em sistema silvipastoril no município de Cruzmaltina, PR. Biblioteca Florestal digital. Available at http://bibliotecaflorestal.ufv.br/handle/123456789/5911
Moraes A de, Carvalho PC de F, Anghinoni I, Lustosa SBC, Costa SEVGdA, Kunrath TR (2014) Integrated crop–livestock systems in the Brazilian subtropics. European Journal of Agronomy 57, 4-9.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Morales MM, Tonini H, Behling M, Hoshide AK (2023) Eucalyptus carbon stock research in an integrated livestock–forestry system in Brazil. Sustainability 15(10), 7750.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Nicodemo MLF, Porfírio-da-Silva V (2019) Bark stripping by cattle in silvopastoral systems. Agroforestry Systems 93, 305-315.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Oliveira EBd, Pinto Junior JE (2021) O eucalipto e a Embrapa: quatro décadas de pesquisa e desenvolvimento. Embrapa Florestas, Brasília, Brazil. Available at https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/1131510/o-eucalipto-e-a-embrapa-quatro-decadas-de-pesquisa-e-desenvolvimento
Paciullo DSC, Gomide CAM, Castro CRT, Maurício RM, Fernandes PB, Morenz MJF (2017) Morphogenesis, biomass and nutritive value of Panicum maximum under different shade levels and fertilizer nitrogen rates. Grass and Forage Science 72(3), 590-600.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pandey CB, Verma SK, Dagar JC, Srivastava RC (2011) Forage production and nitrogen nutrition in three grasses under coconut tree shades in the humid-tropics. Agroforestry Systems 83(1), 1-12.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pang K, Van Sambeek JW, Navarrete-Tindall NE, Lin C-H, Jose S, Garrett HE (2019) Responses of legumes and grasses to non-, moderate, and dense shade in Missouri, USA. I. Forage yield and its species-level plasticity. Agroforestry Systems 93, 11-24.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pezzopane JRM, Bernardi ACdC, Azenha MV, Oliveira PPA, Bosi C, Pedroso AdF, Esteves SN (2020) Production and nutritive value of pastures in integrated livestock production systems: shading and management effects. Scientia Agricola 77(2), e20180150.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pontes L da S, Carpinelli S, Stafin G, Porfírio-da-Silva V, Santos BRC dos (2017) Relationship between sward height and herbage mass for integrated crop–livestock systems with trees. Grassland Science 63(1), 29-35.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pontes L da S, Barro RS, Savian JV, Berndt A, Moletta JL, Porfírio-da-Silva V, Bayer C, Carvalho PC de F (2018) Performance and methane emissions by beef heifer grazing in temperate pastures and in integrated crop–livestock systems: the effect of shade and nitrogen fertilization. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 253, 90-97.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pontes L da S, Porfírio-da-Silva V, Moletta JL, Telles TS (2021) Long-term profitability of crop-livestock systems, with and without trees. Agricultural Systems 192(2), 103204.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Porfírio-da-Silva V, Medrado MJS, Nicodemo MLF, Dereti RM (2009) Arborização de pastagens com espécies florestais madeireiras: implantação e manejo. Embrapa Florestas, Colombo. Available at https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/858079/arborizacao-de-pastagens-com-especies-florestais-madeireiras-implantacao-e-manejo
Porfírio-da-Silva V, Moraes A de, Moletta JL, Pontes L da S, Oliveira EBd, Pelissari A, Carvalho PC de F (2012) Damages caused by cattle on different tree species in silvopastoral systems. Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira 32(70), 67-76.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Romero C, Bolker BM, Edwards CE (2009) Stem responses to damage: the evolutionary ecology of Quercus species in contrasting fire regimes. New Phytologist 182, 261-271.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Sandini IE, Moraes Ad, Pelissari A, Neumann M, Falbo MK, Novakowiski JH (2011) Residual effect of nitrogen in the maize production in crop livestock integration. Ciência Rural 41(8), 1315-1322.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Santos ARM, Gomes FJ, Ximenes ESOC, Aragão WFDX, Silva ACd (2020) Efeito do ambiente luminoso em forrageiras de clima tropical em sistemas silvipastoris. Nativa 8(5), 633-642.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sbrissia AF, Duchini PG, Echeverria JR, Miqueloto T, Bernardon A, Américo LF (2017) Produção animal em pastagens cultivadas em regiões de clima temperado da América Latina. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal 25(1), 47-60.
| Google Scholar |
Silva AR, Veloso CAC, Carvalho EJM, Silveira Filho A, Sales A (2017) Incidência de Danos em Espécies Florestais Causados por Bovinos em Sistema de Integração Lavoura–Pecuária–Floresta. Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, Belém. Available at https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/1074267/incidencia-de-danos-em-especies-florestais-causados-por-bovinos-em-sistema-de-integracao-lavoura-pecuaria-floresta
Sollenberger LE, Moore JE, Allen VG, Pedreira CGS (2005) Reporting forage allowance in grazing experiments. Crop Science 45(3), 896-900.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Statgraphics (2007) Centurion XV, version 15.2.06, 1982–2007. StatPoint, Inc., Herndon. Available at www.statgraphics.com
Strassburg BBN, Latawiec AE, Barioni LG, Nobre CA, da Silva VP, Valentim JF, Vianna M, Assad ED (2014) When enough should be enough: improving the use of current agricultural lands could meet production demands and spare natural habitats in Brazil. Global Environmental Change 28, 84-97.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Teklehaimanot Z, Jones M, Sinclair FL (2002) Tree and livestock productivity in relation to tree planting configuration in a silvopastoral system in North Wales, UK. Agroforestry Systems 56, 47-55.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Triches GP, Moraes A, Porfírio-da-Silva V, Lang CR, Lustosa SBC, Bonatto RA (2020) Damage caused by cattle to Eucalyptus benthamii trees in pruned and unpruned silvopastoral systems. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 55, e01275.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Yates C, Dorward P, Hemery G, Cook P (2007) The economic viability and potential of a novel poultry agroforestry system. Agroforestry Systems 69(1), 13-28.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Zanasi C, Rabboni C, Rota C, José Bungenstab D, Antônio Laura V (2020) The carne carbono neutro accordance to Brazilian consumers’ attitude towards beef. International Journal on Food System Dynamics 11, 360-376.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |