Separation of light weaner lambs may not improve growth rates or wool production when pen-fed for drought feeding

Bridget Longley; Emma Doyle; Susan M. Robertson

doi:10.1071/AN25036

RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Previous Next Contents Vol 65(11)

Separation of light weaner lambs may not improve growth rates or wool production when pen-fed for drought feeding

Bridget Longley ^A , Emma Doyle

^B and Susan M. Robertson

^A ^C ^*

+ Author Affiliations

- Author Affiliations

^A School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia.

^B School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

^C Gulbali Institute, Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia.

^* Correspondence to: surobertson@csu.edu.au

Handling Editor: Andy Greer

Animal Production Science 65, AN25036 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN25036

Submitted: 27 January 2025 Accepted: 7 July 2025 Published: 22 July 2025

© 2025 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Context

The lightest 25% of weaner lambs have double the risk of mortality, but it is unclear whether separation of lighter from heavier lambs will improve growth rates when pen-fed for slow growth.

Aims

This study compared the behaviour and performance of the lightest 25% of weaners when pen-fed in mixed-weight groups or when fed separately.

Methods

Merino wether weaners (n = 234; aged 6 months) were allocated to two replicates of the following two treatments: Light, containing only the lightest 25%, or Mixed, containing 25% lighter and 75% heavier lambs, with 58 or 59 lambs per pen. Lambs in both treatments were fed to gain 100 g/day.head for 6 weeks, and then grazed pasture for a further 6 weeks. Wool, liveweight, and behavioural data were collected.

Key results

During the pen-feeding period, light and heavy lambs in the Mixed treatment gained similar weight (4.0 ± 0.43 and 3.7 ± 0.24 kg respectively; P = 0.555). Light lambs that were fed separately gained as much weight as lighter lambs that shared a pen with heavier lambs. However, overall, lambs in the Light treatment group gained significantly more weight than did those in the Mixed treatment group (4.5 ± 0.20 and 3.7 ± 0.20 kg respectively; P = 0.007). The percentage of lambs eating at feeding increased (P < 0.001) after the first week to >98%, but was similar between treatments. The incidence of bullying observed at feeding was lower in the Light than Mixed treatment (3.2 ± 0.59 and 7.3 ± 0.59%/min respectively; P < 0.001) and declined after the first week of feeding (7.8 ± 0.75 in Week 1, 4.7 ± 0.75%/min in Week 2 and thereafter; P = 0.007). Wool fibre diameter and staple length were similar between treatments.

Conclusions

This study indicated that the separate pen-feeding of the lightest 25% of weaner lambs did not improve weight gain or wool production but may improve animal welfare through a 44.8% decrease in bullying.

Implications

The lightest 25% of weaners can grow at rates similar to those of heavier lambs when fed for slow growth in mixed-weight pens, provided that sickly individuals are removed, and the weaners have been exposed to feeding practices prior to weaning.

Keywords: behaviour, drought, feeding, growth, mortality, nutrition, sheep, survival.

References

Animal Health Australia (2014) Australian animal welfare standards and guidelines for sheep. Version 1.0. January 2016. Endorsed. AHA.

Arnold GW, Maller RA (1974) Some aspects of competition between sheep for supplementary feed. Animal Science 19, 309-319.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Berthel R, Dohme-Meier F, Keil N (2024) Dairy sheep and goats sort for particle size and protein in mixed rations. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 271, 106144.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bowen M, Ryan M, Jordan D, Beretta V, Kirby R, Stockman C, McUntyre B, Rowe J, (2006) Improving sheep feedlot management. In ‘Wool meets meat. Proceedings of the 2006 sheep industry CRC conference’. (Eds P Cronje, B Maxwell) pp. 134–141. (Sheep Industry CRC)

Campbell AJD, Vizard AL, Larsen JWA (2009) Risk factors for post-weaning mortality of Merino sheep in south-eastern Australia. Australian Veterinary Journal 87, 305-312.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Campbell AJD, Broekhuizen A, Curtis K, Croker KP, Behrendt R, Thompson AN (2014) A survey of post-weaning mortality of sheep in Australia and its association with farm and management factors. Animal Production Science 54, 783-790.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

DEDJTR VIC (2018) ‘Drought feeding and management of sheep – a guide for famers and land managers 2018.’ (Victorian Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources (DEDJTR): Melbourne, Vic, Australia)

Dickson H, Jolly S (2011) ‘Project B.CC.0118. National procedures and guidelines for intensive sheep and lamb feeding systems.’ (Meat & Livestock Australia: Sydney, NSW, Australia)

Dove H, Beilharz RG, Black JL (1974) Dominance patterns and positional behaviour of sheep in yards. Animal Science 19, 157-168.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Dundon SG, Mayer DG (2015) Pen parameters for improving the performance of sheep imported from Australia to Persian Gulf feedlots. Small Ruminant Research 126, 16-25.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Freer M, Moore AD, Donnelly JR (1997) GRAZPLAN: decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises – II. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS. Agricultural Systems 54, 77-126.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hatcher S, Eppleston J, Graham RP, McDonald J, Schlunke S, Watt B, Thornberry KJ (2008) Higher weaning weight improves postweaning growth and survival in young Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 966-973.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hatcher S, Eppleston J, Thornberry KJ, Watt B (2010) High Merino weaner survival rates are a function of weaning weight and positive post-weaning growth rates. Animal Production Science 50, 465-472.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Holst PJ, Hall DG, Stanley DF, Nolan JV (1997) Effects of sex and liveweight on feeding behaviour of crossbred weaner lambs receiving oaten grain supplement on lucerne pasture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 37, 611-615.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Jefferies BC (1961) Body condition scoring and its use in management. Tasmanian Journal of Agriculture 32, 19-21.
| Google Scholar |

Lobato JFP, Beilharz RG (1979) Relation of social dominance and body size to intake of supplements in grazing sheep. Applied Animal Ethology 5, 233-239.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Masters DG, Peterson AD, Mata G, Liu SM (1998) Influence of liveweight, liveweight change, and diet on wool growth, staple strength, and fibre diameter in young sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 269-278.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

McDonald C (1986) Feeding behavior of merino wether sheep under conditions similar to those used in assembly for live export. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 16, 39-41.
| Google Scholar |

Rice M, Jongman EC, Borg S, Butler KL, Hemsworth PH (2016) Characterisation of shy-feeding and feeding lambs in the first week in a feedlot. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 179, 39-45.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Robertson SM, Morona A, Gunn A, Piltz J, Scott CJ, Friend MA (2022) Frequency of feeding during the periconceptional period did not alter reproduction in Merino sheep. Animal Production Science 63, 59-69.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Savage DB, Ferguson DM, Fisher AD, Hinch GN, Mayer DG, Duflou E, Lea JM, Baillie ND, Raue M (2008) Preweaning feed exposure and different feed delivery systems to enhance feed acceptance of sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1040-1043.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Sevi A, Taibi L, Albenzio M, Muscio A, Dell’Aquila S, Napolitano F (2001) Behavioral, adrenal, immune, and productive responses of lactating ewes to regrouping and relocation. Journal of Animal Science 79, 1457-1465.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Thorhallsdottir AG, Provenza FD, Balph DF (1990) Ability of lambs to learn about novel foods while observing or participating with social models. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 25, 25-33.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Thornton RF, Hood RL, Jones PN, Re VM (1979) Compensatory growth in sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 135-151.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |