Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
REVIEW

Ostrich leather quality: a review

A. Engelbrecht A B D , L. C. Hoffman A , S. W. P. Cloete A C and S. J. van Schalkwyk A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Animal Sciences, Stellenbosch University, PO Box X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa.

B Institute for Animal Production, Oudtshoorn, PO Box 351, Oudtshoorn 6620, South Africa.

C Institute for Animal Production, Elsenburg, Private Bag X1, Elsenburg 7607, South Africa.

D Corresponding author. Email: anele@elsenburg.com

Animal Production Science 49(7) 549-557 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA08255
Submitted: 20 October 2008  Accepted: 27 March 2009   Published: 11 June 2009

Abstract

This review summarises the research that has been published on factors that influence the various aspects of ostrich leather quality, a vital aspect to the economic viability of the commercial ostrich industry. The review is divided into three main sections: discussing intrinsic, pre-slaughter and post-slaughter factors that influence leather quality. Only one literature source that investigated the morphology of ostrich skin could be found. The high vascularity near the surface of the skin was indicated in making the skin susceptible to bruising, which influences skin quality, while the strength and flexibility of ostrich leather was attributed to the three-dimensional cross-weave arrangement of collagen fibres. Various studies reported a high degree of variation in quality within and between ostrich skins. The potential of genetic selection for improved skin quality was also considered, and it was demonstrated that most ostrich leather traits exhibited significant genetic variation. Findings on pre-slaughter factors, such as the effects of age, weight, nutrition and management practices, are also summarised. Few research reports on post-slaughter factors that influence leather quality were found. A few studies looked at the effect of storage on ostrich skin quality, but literature on the effect of processing techniques are lacking. Research priorities identified include the development of methods to assess skin quality on-farm and finding objective methods of evaluating ostrich leather quality.

Additional keywords: lesions, product quality, skin, Struthio camelus.


References


André M (1960) Sarcoptides plumicoles parasites des austruches. Acarologia 2, 556–567. [Verified May 2009]

Nel K, Lambrechts H, Cloete S, Clark J (2000) Bestuurspraktyke wat die gradering van volstruisvelle kan beïnvloed. Elsenburg Joernaal 2000, 52–58. open url image1

Raines A (1995) What’s a slaughtering bird? Exclusively Ostrich 3, 18–22. open url image1

Russell AE , Kohl R (1999) Salting of ostrich skins. Comparative cure quality in stack-salting and drum-brining of ostrich skins. LIRI Report no. 2005. (Grahamstown Ostrich Tanning Company: Grahamstown, South Africa)

Sales J (1999) Slaughter and products. In ‘The ostrich: biology, production and health’. (Ed. DC Deeming) pp. 230–274. (CABI: Wallingford, UK)

Smit DJvZ (1964) Volstruisboerdery in die Klein-Karoo. Pamphlet no. 358. Departement van Landbou-Tegniese dienste, Pretoria, South Africa.

Stone B , Kohl R , Russell AE (1998) Examination of cure quality in a production wet-salted ostrich skin cutting. LIRI Report no. 1984. (Grahamstown Ostrich Tanning Company: Grahamstown, South Africa)

Swart D (1981) Die evaluering van die ekonomiese waarde van die vel, vleis en vere op die lewendige slagvolstruis. Research report. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, South Africa.

Swart D, Heydenrych HJ, Poggenpoel DG (1984) Die relatiewe ekonomiese belang van kwaliteitseienskappe in volstruisvere. South African Journal of Animal Science 14, 45–50. open url image1

Van Schalkwyk SJ (2008) Factors affecting ostrich leather traits. PhD Thesis, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa.

Van Schalkwyk SJ, Cloete SWP, Hoffman LC, Meyer A (2005) Evaluation of subjectively assessed nodule traits of ostrich skins as influenced by slaughter age. South African Journal of Animal Science 35, 48–54. open url image1