Productivity of diverse forage brassica genotypes exceeds that of oats across multiple environments within Australia’s mixed farming zone
Lucinda J. Watt
A , Lindsay W. Bell A , Brett D. Cocks A , Anthony D. Swan B , Rebecca S. Stutz B , Andrew Toovey C and Joanne De Faveri D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A CSIRO Agriculture and Food, PO Box 102, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
B CSIRO Agriculture and Food, PO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
C CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Private Bag 5, Wembley, WA 6913, Australia.
D CSIRO Data 61, PO Box 780, Atherton, Qld 4883, Australia.
E Corresponding author. Email: lucy.watt@csiro.au
Crop and Pasture Science 72(5) 393-406 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP21034
Submitted: 22 January 2021 Accepted: 6 April 2021 Published: 1 June 2021
Journal Compilation © CSIRO 2021 Open Access CC BY
Abstract
In many areas of Australia’s mixed farming zone, cropping rotations are dominated by cereals and some areas have few suitable broadleaf alternatives. Forage brassicas are widely used in high rainfall livestock systems, but this study shows that several genotypes offer an alternative to forage oats in drier environments within Australia’s mixed farming zone. We compared a diverse set of forage brassica genotypes sown in autumn and winter with benchmark species, principally oats, across 10 experimental site-years. In both early (800–1300 growing degree days after sowing) and late (1600–2100 growing degree days after sowing) grazing windows, several forage brassica genotypes had forage production similar or superior to oats and dual-purpose canola. Many forage brassica genotypes produced higher yields of metabolisable energy (ME) and crude protein (CP), particularly in the late grazing window. In the early grazing window, Rival and Green globe turnips and HT-R24 forage rape consistently produced ~15% above the site mean for all productivity measures, whereas kale produced ~40% less than the site mean. In the late grazing window, oats produced the greatest amount of edible biomass (~44% higher than the site mean); however, Goliath and HT-R24 forage rapes, Pallaton raphanobrassica and dual-purpose canola had the highest yields of ME and CP (~16% higher than the site mean). Green globe turnip, Hunter leafy turnip and Regal kale produced ~22% less than the site mean in this late grazing window. Multi-environment analyses revealed no genotype × environment interactions within the early grazing window. In the late grazing window, there were several genotypic adaptations, particularly for Pallaton, which performed better in low–medium production environments than the other genotypes. We show that forage brassicas offer superior yields of ME and CP, indicating that they may be better able to meet the energy and protein demands of grazing livestock than forage oats.
Keywords: arid environments, crude protein, feedbase, metabolisable energy, multi-environment analysis.
References
ACC (1990) ‘Feeding standards for Australian livestock: ruminants.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)Adams C, Scott WR, Wilson DR, Purves L (2005) Dry matter accumulation and phenological development of four brassica cultivars sown in Canterbury. Agronomy New Zealand 35, 1–18.
AFIA (2014) ‘AFIA laboratory methods manual.’ (Australian Fodder Industry Association: Melbourne)
Angus JF, Kirkegaard JA, Hunt JR, Ryan MH, Ohlander L, Peoples MB (2015) Break crops and rotations for wheat. Crop & Pasture Science 66, 523–552.
| Break crops and rotations for wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Barry TN (2013) The feeding value of forage brassica plants for grazing ruminant livestock. Animal Feed Science and Technology 181, 15–25.
| The feeding value of forage brassica plants for grazing ruminant livestock.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1–48.
| Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bell LW, Moore AD, Kirkegaard JA (2014) Evolution in crop-livestock integration systems that improve farm productivity and environmental performance in Australia. European Journal of Agronomy 57, 10–20.
Bell LW, Moore AD, Thomas DT (2018) Integrating diverse forage sources reduces feed gaps on mixed crop–livestock farms. Animal 12, 1967–1980.
| Integrating diverse forage sources reduces feed gaps on mixed crop–livestock farms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29198288PubMed |
Bell LW, Watt LJ, Stutz RS (2020) Forage brassicas have potential for wider use in drier, mixed crop–livestock farming systems across Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 71, 924–943.
| Forage brassicas have potential for wider use in drier, mixed crop–livestock farming systems across Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Butler DG, Cullis BR, Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Thompson R (2017) ‘ASReml-R reference manual. Version 4.’ Manual 176. (VSN International: Hemel Hempstead, UK) http://www.homepages.ed.ac.uk/iwhite/asreml/uop
Chakwizira E, De Ruiter JM (2014) Water use efficiency of forage kale crops. In ‘Proceedings 6th Australasian Dairy Science Symposium’. Hamilton, New Zealand. (Ed. J Roche) pp. 100–104. (Australasian Dairy Science Symposium)
Chakwizira E, Gillespie R, Maley S, George M, Michel A (2013) Water and nitrogen use efficiency of forage kale crops. Agronomy New Zealand 43, 1–16.
Collett M, Matthews Z (2014) Photosensitivity in cattle grazing Brassica crops. International Journal of Poisonous Plant Research 3, 6–21.
de Ruiter JM, Wilson D, Maley S, Fletcher A, Fraser T, Scott WR, Dumbleton A, Nichol WW (2009) ‘Management practices for forage brassicas.’ (Forage Brassica Development Group, New Zealand)
Dumbleton A, Gowers S, Conner A, Christie M, Kenny P, Mulcock H, Charteris B (2012) Cleancrop (TM) brassica system: the development of herbicide resistant brassica crops for New Zealand farming systems. In ‘Proceedings New Zealand Grassland Association’. pp. 25–30. (New Zealand Grassland Association)
Finlay KW, Wilkinson GN (1963) The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 742–754.
| The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fletcher AL, Sinton SM, Gillespie RN, Maley S, Sim RE, De Ruiter JM (2010) Drought response and water use efficiency of forage brassica crops. In ‘Proceedings Agronomy Society of New Zealand’. pp. 105–117. (Agronomy Society of New Zealand)
Fletcher AL, Chakwizira E, Maley S, George M (2012) Canopy development and radiation use efficiency of four forage brassica crops. In ‘Proceedings 16th Australian Agronomy Conference’. Armidale, NSW. (Ed. I Yunusa) (Australian Society of Agronomy)
Freer M, Moore A, Donnelly J (1997) GRAZPLAN: decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises—II. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS. Agricultural Systems 54, 77–126.
| GRAZPLAN: decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises—II. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gilmour AR, Cullis BR, Verbyla AP (1997) Accounting for natural and extraneous variation in the analysis of field experiments. Journal of Agricultural, Biological & Environmental Statistics 2, 269–293.
| Accounting for natural and extraneous variation in the analysis of field experiments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harper F, Compton IJ (1980) Sowing date, harvest date and the yield of forage brassica crops. Grass and Forage Science 35, 147–157.
| Sowing date, harvest date and the yield of forage brassica crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Healy D, Gilmour P, Campbell J (2013) Grain and Graze 2 Impact Report. Report for Grains Research and Development Corporation. GRDC, Canberra, ACT.
Howieson JG, O’Hara GW, Carr SJ (2000) Changing roles for legumes in Mediterranean agriculture: developments from an Australian perspective. Field Crops Research 65, 107–122.
| Changing roles for legumes in Mediterranean agriculture: developments from an Australian perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jacobs JL, Ward GN, McDowell AM, Kearney GA (2001) A survey on the effect of establishment techniques, crop management, moisture availability and soil type on turnip dry matter yields and nutritive characteristics in western Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 743–751.
| A survey on the effect of establishment techniques, crop management, moisture availability and soil type on turnip dry matter yields and nutritive characteristics in western Victoria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kelly AM, Smith AB, Eccleston JA, Cullis BR (2007) The accuracy of varietal selection using factor analytic models for multi-environment plant breeding trials. Crop Science 47, 1063–1070.
| The accuracy of varietal selection using factor analytic models for multi-environment plant breeding trials.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirkegaard JA, Conyers MK, Hunt JR, Kirkby CA, Watt M, Rebetzke GJ (2014) Sense and nonsense in conservation agriculture: principles, pragmatism and productivity in Australian mixed farming systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 187, 133–145.
| Sense and nonsense in conservation agriculture: principles, pragmatism and productivity in Australian mixed farming systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirkegaard JA, Lilley JM, Morrison MJ (2016) Drivers of trends in Australian canola productivity and future prospects. Crop & Pasture Science 67, i–ix.
| Drivers of trends in Australian canola productivity and future prospects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirkegaard JA, Lilley JM, Berry PM, Rondanini DP (2021) Canola. ‘Crop physiology case histories for major crops’. (Eds V Sadras, D Calderini) pp. 518–549. (Elsevier: Amsterdam)
Lawes RA, Huth ND, Hochman Z (2016) Commercially available wheat cultivars are broadly adapted to location and time of sowing in Australia’s grain zone. European Journal of Agronomy 77, 38–46.
| Commercially available wheat cultivars are broadly adapted to location and time of sowing in Australia’s grain zone.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lindsay CL, Kemp PD, Kenyon PR, Morris ST (2007) Summer lamb finishing on forage crops. In ‘Proceedings New Zealand Society of Animal Production’. pp. 121–125. (New Zealand Society of Animal Production)
McCormick JI, Virgona JM, Kirkegaard JA (2012) Growth, recovery, and yield of dual-purpose canola (Brassica napus) in the medium-rainfall zone of south-eastern Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 63, 635–646.
| Growth, recovery, and yield of dual-purpose canola (Brassica napus) in the medium-rainfall zone of south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Moate PJ, Roche JR, Durling P (1996) Fodder turnips on Gippsland dairy farms. In ‘Proceedings Grassland Society of Victoria 37th Annual Conference’. Mornington, Vic. pp. 141–142. (Grassland Society of Victoria)
Morton JM, Campbell PH (1997) Disease signs reported in south-eastern Australian dairy cattle while grazing Brassica species. Australian Veterinary Journal 75, 109–113.
| Disease signs reported in south-eastern Australian dairy cattle while grazing Brassica species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 9066967PubMed |
Neilsen JE, Rowe BA, Lane P (2000) Water use efficiency of four irrigated brassica forage crops. In ‘Proceedings Irrigation Association of Australia Conference’. Melbourne, Vic. pp. (Ed. G Connellan) pp. 136–139. (Irrigation Association of Australia: Melbourne)
Nichol WW (2003) Variation between forage rape (Brassica napus) cultivars for live-weight gain is due to anti-nutritional compounds. MSc. thesis, Lincoln University, New Zealand.
Nie ZN, Slocombe L, Behrendt R, Raeside M, Clark S, Jacobs JL (2020) Feeding lambs proportional mixtures of lucerne (Medicago sativa) and forage brassica (Brassica napus) grown under warm and dry conditions. Animal Production Science
| Feeding lambs proportional mixtures of lucerne (Medicago sativa) and forage brassica (Brassica napus) grown under warm and dry conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Paridaen A, Kirkegaard JA (2015) Forage canola (Brassica napus): spring-sown winter canola for biennial dual-purpose use in the high-rainfall zone of southern Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 66, 275–286.
| Forage canola (Brassica napus): spring-sown winter canola for biennial dual-purpose use in the high-rainfall zone of southern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Raeside M., Byron J, Cameron F, MacDonald C, Partington D, Kearney GAB, Behrendt RA (2020) Spring-sown winter-type canola (Brassica napus) as summer–autumn forage for sheep production in southern Australia. Animal Production Science
| Spring-sown winter-type canola (Brassica napus) as summer–autumn forage for sheep production in southern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robertson MJ, Holland JF (2004) Production risk of canola in the semi-arid subtropics of Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 525–538.
| Production risk of canola in the semi-arid subtropics of Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smith AB, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2001) Analyzing variety by environment data using multiplicative mixed models and adjustments for spatial field trend. Biometrics 57, 1138–1147.
| Analyzing variety by environment data using multiplicative mixed models and adjustments for spatial field trend.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smith BJ, Kirkegaard JA, Howe GN (2004) Impacts of Brassica break-crops on soil biology and yield of following wheat crops. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 1–11.
| Impacts of Brassica break-crops on soil biology and yield of following wheat crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smith AB, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2005) The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials: an overview of current mixed model approaches. The Journal of Agricultural Science 143, 449–462.
| The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials: an overview of current mixed model approaches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sprague SJ, Kirkegaard JA, Graham JM, Bell LW, Seymour M, Ryan M (2015) Forage and grain yield of diverse canola (Brassica napus) maturity types in the high-rainfall zone of Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 66, 260–274.
| Forage and grain yield of diverse canola (Brassica napus) maturity types in the high-rainfall zone of Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sun XZ, Waghorn GC, Hoskin SO, Harrison SJ, Muetzel S, Pacheco D (2012) Methane emissions from sheep fed fresh brassicas (Brassica spp.) compared to perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). Animal Feed Science and Technology 176, 107–116.
| Methane emissions from sheep fed fresh brassicas (Brassica spp.) compared to perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sun X, Henderson G, Cox F, Molano G, Harrison SJ, Luo D, Janssen PH, Pacheco D (2015) Lambs fed fresh winter forage rape (Brassica napus L.) emit less methane than those fed perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.), and possible mechanisms behind the difference. PLoS One 10, e0119697
| Lambs fed fresh winter forage rape (Brassica napus L.) emit less methane than those fed perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.), and possible mechanisms behind the difference.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26717241PubMed |
Sun X, Pacheco D, Luo D (2016) Forage brassica: a feed to mitigate enteric methane emissions? Animal Production Science 56, 451–456.
| Forage brassica: a feed to mitigate enteric methane emissions?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Van Soest PJ (1994) ‘Nutritional ecology of the ruminant.’ (Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA)
Vigil MF, Anderson RL, Beard WE (1997) Base temperature and growing-degree-hour requirements for the emergence of canola. Crop Science 37, 844–849.
| Base temperature and growing-degree-hour requirements for the emergence of canola.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Waters ER, Schaal BA (1996) Biased gene conversion is not occurring among rDNA repeats in the Brassica triangle. Genome 39, 150–154.
| Biased gene conversion is not occurring among rDNA repeats in the Brassica triangle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18469883PubMed |
Westwood CT, Mulcock H (2012) Nutritional evaluation of five species of forage brassica. In ‘Proceedings New Zealand Grassland Association’. pp. 31–38. (New Zealand Grassland Association)
