Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Breeding for Papaya ringspot virus resistance in Carica papaya via hybridisation with Vasconcellea quercifolia

R. A. Drew A C , S. V. Siar B , C. M. O’Brien A , P. M. Magdalita B and A. G. C. Sajise B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Faculty of Science, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia.

B Institute for Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, University of the Philippines at Los Baños, Laguna 4031, Philippines.

C Corresponding author. Email: r.drew@griffith.edu.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46(3) 413-418 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA04247
Submitted: 18 November 2004  Accepted: 11 August 2005   Published: 28 March 2006

Abstract

Papaya ringspot virus type P (PRSV-P) is a major threat to the papaya industry worldwide. F1 hybrids have been produced when Carica papaya L. female flowers have been pollinated with pollen of the PRSV-P resistant species Vasconcellea quercifolia. F1 plant production required embryo rescue 90 days post-pollination, and plantlet regeneration in vitro. Three hundred F1 hybrids were grown to maturity in the field and had morphological characteristics that were identical to 1 or both parents, were intermediate between those of the parents, or were greater than either parent. They had a sex ratio of 2 (male) : 49 (hermaphrodite) : 49(female). Eighteen plants (7 male and 11 hermaphrodite) produced some viable pollen. Pollen viability of these plants as measured by germination on agar medium varied between 1.1 and 6.1% (mean of 3.37 ± 0.18) compared with >90% for C. papaya. Cytogenetic studies showed limited homology between C. papaya and V. quercifolia genomes. The intergeneric hybrids varied in their reaction to strains of PRSV-P in Australia and the Philippines. Of the hybrids, 75% were resistant to PRSV-P while 25% produced virus symptoms.

Additional keywords: embryo rescue, in vitro culture.


Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, the Australian Papaw Industry via Queensland Fruit and Vegetable Growers, and Horticulture Australia for funding this research.


References


Badillo VM (1971) ‘Monografia de la Familia Caricaceae.’ (Universidad Central de Venezuela: Maracay)

Badillo VM (2000) Carica L. vs. Vasconcellea St.-Hil. (Caricaceae) con la rehabilitacion de este ultimo. Ernstia 10, 74–79. (verified 17 March 2006)

Horovitz S, Jiménez H (1967) Cruzamientos interspecificos e intergenericos en Caricaceae y sus implicaciones fitotecnicas. Agronomia Tropical 17, 323–343. open url image1

Jiménez H, Horovitz S (1958) Cruzabilidad entre especies de Carica. Agronomia Tropical 7, 207–215. open url image1

Jobin-Decor MP, Graham GC, Henry RJ, Drew RA (1997) RAPD and isozyme analysis of genetic relationships between Carica papaya and wild relatives. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 44, 471–477.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kim MS, Moore PH, Zee F, Fitch MM, Steiger DL, Manshardt RM, Paull RE, Drew RA, Sekioka T, Ming R (2002) Genetic and molecular characterisation of Carica papaya L. Genome 45, 503–512.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Khuspe SS , Hendre RR , Mascarenhas AF , Jagannathan V , Thombre MV , Joshi AB (1980) Utilization of tissue culture to isolate interspecific hybrids in Carica L. In ‘Plant tissue culture, genetic manipulation and somatic hybridization of plant cells’. (Eds PS Rao, MR Heble, MS Chadha) pp, 198–205. (Bhamba Atomic Research Centre: Bombay)

Litz RE, Conover RA (1983) High-frequency somatic embryogenesis from Carica suspension cultures. Annals of Botany 51, 683–686. open url image1

Magdalita PM, Villegas VN, Pimentel RB, Bayot RG (1988) Reaction of papaya (Carica papaya L.) and related Carica species to ringspot virus. Philippine Journal of Crop Science 13, 129–132. open url image1

Magdalita PM, Opina OS, Espino RRC, Villegas VN (1989) Epidemiology of papaya ringspot virus in the Philippines. Philippine Phytopathology 25, 1–11. open url image1

Magdalita PM, Adkins SW, Godwin ID, Drew RA (1996) An improved embryo-rescue protocol for a Carica interspecific hybrid. Australian Journal of Botany 44, 343–353.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Magdalita PM, Drew RA, Adkins SW, Godwin ID (1997a) Morphological, molecular and cytological analyses of Carica papaya × C. cauliflora interspecific hybrids. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 95, 224–229.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Magdalita PM, Persley DM, Godwin ID, Drew RA, Adkins SW (1997b) Screening Carica papaya × C. cauliflora hybrids for resistance to papaya ringspot virus-type P. Plant Pathology 46, 837–841.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Magdalita PM, Drew RA, Godwin ID, Adkins SW (1998) An efficient interspecific hybridisation protocol for Carica papaya L.× C. cauliflora Jacq. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 38, 523–530.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Manshardt RM, Drew RA (1998) Biotechnology of papaya. Acta Horticulturae 461, 65–73. open url image1

Manshardt RM, Wenslaff TF (1989a) Zygotic polyembryony in interspecific hybrids of Carica papaya and C. cauliflora. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 114, 684–689. open url image1

Manshardt RM, Wenslaff TF (1989b) Interspecific hybridisation of papaya with other Carica species. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 114, 689–694. open url image1

National Farmers Federation (1998) Other horticultural crops. In ‘Australian agriculture’. (Ed. B Pestana) pp. 347–354. (Morescope Publishing: Melbourne)

Sawant AC (1958) Crossing relationships in the genus Carica. Evolution 12, 263–266. open url image1

Story WB (1976) Papaya. In ‘Evolution of crop plants’. (Ed. NW Simmonds) pp. 21–24. (Longman Inc.: New York)

Thomas JE, Dodman RL (1993) The first record of papaya ringspot virus-type P from Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology 22, 1–7.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1