Factors affecting wool scouring performance, yield and colour measurements of Western Australian fleece wools
D. J. Westmoreland A D , A. C. Schlink B and J. C. Greeff CA CSIRO Textile and Fibre Technology, PO Box 21, Belmont, Vic. 3216, Australia.
B CSIRO Livestock Industries, Private Bag 5, Wembley, WA 6913, Australia.
C Western Australian Department of Agriculture, 10 Dore Street, Katanning, WA 6317, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: dave.westmoreland@csiro.au
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46(7) 921-925 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05352
Submitted: 21 November 2005 Accepted: 8 April 2006 Published: 8 June 2006
Abstract
A benchtop scouring procedure was used to evaluate the ability of conventional detergent scouring systems to adequately clean fleece samples from a selection of Western Australian Merino wools. Sixteen fleeces were selected from the Western Australian Department of Agriculture resource flocks, covering a wide range in yield (49.2 to 77.5%), wax (7.3 to 26.9%), suint (4.9 to 11.6%), and dust (1.4 to 16.3%) contents. Using a simple detergent-based system, 50% of the fleeces were classified as effectively scoured, based on residual wax content. When scouring liquor was not refreshed between subsamples drawn from the same fleece, wool wax, staple length and dust content in the greasy fleece accounted for 93% of the variation in the rate of residual wax increase observed in sequential 10 g samples of wool. Residual ash content also increased but the greasy fleece parameters measured were not statistically significant predictors of residual ash changes. The rate of scoured wool colour change, when sequential samples of greasy wool from the same fleece were scoured without liquor change, could be predicted from greasy fleece yields. The scouring efficiency of the more difficult to scour wools was improved by the addition of sodium carbonate to the main scouring bowls.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the Australian Sheep Industries Cooperative Research Centre for the partial funding of this project.
Dowling ME,
Schlink AC, Greeff JC
(2005) Dust penetration is not genetically and phenotypically the same trait as dust content: 3 years of data. Proceedings of the Association for Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 16, 68–71.
James PJ,
Ponzoni RW,
Walkley JRW, Whitely KJ
(1990) Genetic parameters for wool production and quality traits in South Australian merinos of the Collinsville family group. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 41, 583–594.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ladyman ME,
Schlink AC,
Williams IH, Vercoe PE
(2003) Dust penetration is not genetically and phenotypically the same trait as dust content. Proceedings of the Association for Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics. 15, 273–276.
Lockart LW
(1954) Sampling of fleeces for yield, staple length, and crimps per inch measurement Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 5, 555–557.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mahar TJ, Osborne L
(1996) The relationship between the clean colour of commercial consignments of greasy wool and the colour of the resulting top and noil. International Journal of Sheep and Wool Science 44, 219–237.
Marler JW
(1992) Raw wool specification using clean colour and staple measurements. International Journal of Sheep and Wool Science 40, 85–88.
Petrie DJ,
Lidgar JJ,
Marler JW, Ireland AHM
(2004) Measurement of IWTO-19 ash content by near infrared reflectance (NIR) analysis. International Journal of Sheep and Wool Science 52, 245–259.
Schlink AC, Murray AM
(2002) Components of Alpaca (Lama pacos) fleeces and the potential of in-shed measurement of fibre diameter. Animal Production in Australia 24, 349.
Thomson B, Teasdale DC
(1986) The colour of commercially scoured Australian wool. International Journal of Sheep and Wool Science 33, 127–128.
Thornberry KJ, Atkins KD
(1984) Variation in non-wool components of the greasy fleece over the body of Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 24, 62–76.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |