Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Genetic parameters for yearling wool production, wool quality and bodyweight traits in fine wool Merino sheep

A. A. Swan A B C , I. W. Purvis A and L. R. Piper A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO Livestock Industries, FD McMaster Research Laboratory, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.

B Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit (AGBU1), University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: andrew.swan@une.edu.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(9) 1168-1176 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07425
Submitted: 21 December 2007  Accepted: 27 May 2008   Published: 7 August 2008

Abstract

Genetic parameters were estimated for traits measured in the first year of production in a multi-bloodline flock of fine wool Merino sheep. Between 5025 and 9271 animals were measured, depending on the trait, and these animals were the progeny of up to 430 sires. Heritability estimates for fleece weight traits ranged from 0.37 to 0.49, while estimates for five wool quality traits ranged from 0.34 for staple strength to 0.66 for mean fibre diameter. For bodyweight, the heritability estimated at weaning was 0.20, and at the yearling age was 0.51. Maternal genetic effects were significant for fleece weight and bodyweight traits and were highly correlated between these trait groups, indicating that these effects are determined by similar groups of genes in both trait groups. While most genetic correlation estimates were either favourable or neutral, there were economically antagonistic correlations between fleece weight and mean fibre diameter, ranging from 0.15 to 0.30, and between mean fibre diameter and staple strength (0.26). Overall, the heritabilities and genetic correlations estimated in this fine wool population were similar to estimates from other strains, indicating that outcomes from selection programs will be similar across strains and that fine wool sheep can be included in across flock genetic evaluations with other strains.


Acknowledgements

The CSIRO Fine Wool Project was partially funded by The Woolmark Co. and the Cooperative Research Centre for Premium Quality Wool. We also acknowledge the valuable contribution made by the participating sheep breeders, and the dedication and professionalism of all CSIRO staff who worked on the project.


References


Asadi Fozi M, Van der Werf JHJ, Swan AA (2005) The importance of accounting for maternal genetic effects in Australian fine-wool Merino breeding. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 789–796.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Atkins KD, Ramsay AMM (2001) Can weaning weight improve the accuracy of genetic evaluation for fleece weight in young Merino sheep? Proceedings of the Association for Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 14, 373–376. open url image1

Brown DJ, Huisman AE, Swan AA, Graser H-U, Woolaston RR, Ball AJ, Atkins KD, Banks RG (2007) Genetic evaluation for the Australian sheep industry. Proceedings of the Association for Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 17, 187–194. open url image1

Coelli KA, Atkins KD, Casey AE, Semple SJ (1996) Genetic differences among Merino bloodlines from NSW and Victorian wether comparisons (1984–1995). Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 44, 178–195. open url image1

Fogarty NM (1995) Genetic parameters for liveweight, fat and muscle measurements, wool production and reproduction in sheep: a review. Animal Breeding Abstracts 63, 101–143. open url image1

Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2006) ‘ASReml User Guide Release 2.0.’ (VSN International Ltd: Hemel Hempstead, UK)

Hickson JD, Swan AA, Kinghorn BP, Piper LR (1995) Maternal effects at different ages in Merino sheep. Proceedings of the Australian Association for Animal Breeding and Genetics 11, 416–420. open url image1

Kelly MJ, Swan AA, Atkins KD (2007) Optimal use of on-farm fibre diameter measurement and its impact on reproduction in commercial Merino flocks. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 525–534.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Mortimer SI, Atkins KD (1995) Maternal effects influence growth traits of Merino sheep. Proceedings of the Australian Association for Animal Breeding and Genetics 11, 421–424. open url image1

Mullaney PD, Brown GH, Young SSY, Hyland PG (1970) Genetic and phenotypic parameters for wool characteristics in fine-wool Merino, Corriedale, and Polwarth sheep. II. Phenotypic and genetic correlations, heritability, and repeatability. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 21, 527–540.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Purvis IW, Swan AA (1997) Can follicle density be used to enhance the rate of genetic improvement in Merino flocks? Proceedings of the Australian Association for Animal Breeding and Genetics 12, 512–515. open url image1

Safari E, Fogarty NM, Gilmour AR (2005) A review of genetic parameter estimates for wool, growth, meat and reproduction traits in sheep. Livestock Production Science 92, 271–289.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Safari E, Fogarty NM, Gilmour AR, Atkins KD, Mortimer SI, Swan AA, Brien FD, Greeff JC, Van der Werf JHJ (2007a) Across population genetic parameters for wool, growth and reproduction traits in Australian Merino sheep. 2. Estimates of heritability and variance components. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 177–184. open url image1

Safari E, Fogarty NM, Gilmour AR, Atkins KD, Mortimer SI, Swan AA, Brien FD, Greeff JC, van der Werf JHJ (2007b) Genetic correlations among and between wool, growth and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 124, 65–72.
CAS | Crossref | PubMed |
open url image1

Swan AA, Lax J, Purvis IW (1995) Genetic variation in objectively measured wool traits in CSIRO’s fine wool flock. Proceedings of the Australian Association for Animal Breeding and Genetics 11, 516–520. open url image1

Vaez Torshizi R, Nicholas FW, Raadsma HW (1996) REML estimates of variance and covariance components for production traits in Australian Merino sheep, using an animal model. 1. Bodyweight from birth to 22 months. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 1235–1249.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wuliji T, Dodds KG, Land JTJ, Andrews RN, Turner PR (2001) Selection for ultrafine Merino sheep in New Zealand: heritability, phenotypic and genetic correlations of liveweight, fleece weight and wool characteristics in yearlings. Animal Science (Penicuik, Scotland) 72, 241–250. open url image1









1 AGBU is a joint venture of NSW Department of Primary Industries and the University of New England.