Stocktake Sale on now: wide range of books at up to 70% off!
Register      Login
Australian Energy Producers Journal Australian Energy Producers Journal Society
Journal of Australian Energy Producers
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Practical lessons from implementing a top-down, drone-based methane emissions quantification technology into global oil and gas operations

David Turner A *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A SeekOps Inc, Austin, TX, USA.




Dave Turner is the Asia Pacific Region Director for SeekOps, based in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Dave started his oil and gas career as a wireline engineer after completing his mechanical engineering degree and worked in the field for 5 years in locations across the Middle East. He then held various operations, sales, and technical management positions in upstream service product lines in Vietnam, Malaysia, and Angola. Returning to Malaysia, Dave specialised in conveyance risk management before entering the methane emissions detection field at SeekOps. Dave is a UK Chartered Mechanical Engineer and holds an engineering degree from the University of Wales, Cardiff, and an MBA from Imperial College London.

* Correspondence to: dturner@seekops.com

Australian Energy Producers Journal 64 44-53 https://doi.org/10.1071/EP23031
Submitted: 15 December 2023  Accepted: 18 January 2024  Published: 16 May 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of Australian Energy Producers.

Abstract

Reliable top-down quantification of methane emissions from oil and gas operations is increasingly crucial but challenging. Many new technologies are emerging that aim to offer solutions, but they vary widely in their actual field performance, cost, and breadth of applicability. Operators need to evaluate and test different technologies, which can be time-consuming and complex. Once a technology has been selected for use, then typically field trials follow before wider introduction to the operation. This process takes considerable time and effort, and frequently requires extensive learning by the teams involved. Additionally, interpretation of performance often depends upon measurement use-case (e.g. regulatory, voluntary, or leak detection and repair). This paper will share some of the learnings made by the users and technology provider in the assessment and global introduction of a high sensitivity drone-based methane emissions detection, localisation, and quantification technology. There will be a particular focus on practical, operational considerations for such introductions to help accelerate the ongoing efforts of others interested in implementing emissions quantification technologies. Examples from Australia and further afield (both onshore and offshore) will be used to illustrate key points within the paper which include the value of third-party technology validation, consistency across multiple operations and scalability/availability of services.

Keywords: methane, emissions quantification, localisation, drone, UAV, RPAS, top-down, site level, OGMP 2.0.

Biographies

EP23031_B1.gif

Dave Turner is the Asia Pacific Region Director for SeekOps, based in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Dave started his oil and gas career as a wireline engineer after completing his mechanical engineering degree and worked in the field for 5 years in locations across the Middle East. He then held various operations, sales, and technical management positions in upstream service product lines in Vietnam, Malaysia, and Angola. Returning to Malaysia, Dave specialised in conveyance risk management before entering the methane emissions detection field at SeekOps. Dave is a UK Chartered Mechanical Engineer and holds an engineering degree from the University of Wales, Cardiff, and an MBA from Imperial College London.

References

American Petroleum Institute (2019) ‘Developing an Unmanned Aircraft Systems Program.’ (API: Washington, DC, USA)

Balestrieri E, Daponte P, De Vito L, Picariello F, Tudosa I (2021) Sensors and Measurements for UAV Safety: An overview. Sensors 21, 8253.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Carbon Limits (2020) Overview of methane detection and measurement technologies for offshore. Report prepared by Carbon Limits for Offshore Norge. Available at https://www.carbonlimits.no/projects/offshore-methane-detection-and-quantification-technologies-9nos9

Churchill J, Wise B, Cooper I, Smith B (2022) Automated Unmanned Systems Perform Safe Emissions Quantification &Reduction in Permian Operations. SPE-210173-MS. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, USA. 10.2118/210173-MS

Corbett A, Smith B (2022) Study of a Miniature TDLAS System Onboard Two Unmanned Aircraft to Independently Quantify Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas Production Assets and Other Industrial Emitters. Atmosphere 13, 804.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

DeBruyn Z, Wagner-Riddle C, VanderZaag A (2020) Assessment of Open-path Spectrometer Accuracy at Low Path-integrated Methane Concentrations. Atmosphere 11(2), 184(2),.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Donnat L, Huet N (2022) Industrial Facility Top-Down Green House Gas Emissions Quantification Using in-House Gas Analyzer AUSEA Deployed by Drone. SPE-210935-MS. Paper presented at the ADIPEC, Abu Dhabi, UAE. 10.2118/210935-MS

Fahy R (2023) Quantification & Reduction of Methane (GHG) Emissions Though Aerial Intelligence. SPE-216027-MS. Paper presented at the ADIPEC, Abu Dhabi, UAE. 10.2118/216027-MS

GlobalData Energy (2022) Drone use cases have grown in oil & gas operations. Available at https://www.offshore-technology.com/comment/drone-oil-gas-operations/?cf-view [accessed 13 November 2023]

IOGP (2023) Methane detection and quantification technology filtering tool. Available at https://www.iogp.org/workstreams/environment/environment/methane-emissions-detection-and-quantification/methane-detection-and-quantification-technology-filtering-tool/tool/ [accessed 8 December 2023]

IOGP/Carbon Limits (2023) Recommended Practices for Methane Emissions Detection and Quantification Technologies - Upstream (International Association of Oil & Gas Producers)

Johnsen S, Transeth S, Holmstrom S, Merz M, Bakken T, Grotli E, Storvold R (2020) ‘Safety and security of drones in the oil and gas industry.’ (Research Publishing: Venice, Singapore)

Joynes I, Wittwer M, Manolas Y (2023) Developing a ‘fit for purpose’ approach to managing methane emissions. The APPEA Journal 63, S399-S403.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

NOAA Earth System Research Laboratories (2023) Global CH4 Monthly Means. Available at https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends_ch4/ [accessed 12 December 2023]

Omara M, Zavala-Araiza D, Lyon DR, Hmiel B, Roberts KA, Hamburg SP (2022) Methane emissions from US low production oil and natural gas well sites. Nature Communications 13, 2085.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Ravikumar AP, Sreedhara S, Wang J, Englander J, Roda-Stuart D, Bell C, Zimmerle D, Lyon D, Mogstad I, Ratner B, Brandt AR (2019) Single-blind inter-comparison of methane detection technologies – results from the Stanford/EDF Mobile Monitoring Challenge. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 7, 37.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Singh D, Barlow B, Hugenholtz C, Funk W, Robinson C, Ravikumar A (2021) Field Performance of New Methane Detection Technologies: Results from the Alberta Methane Field Challenge. [Preprint] EarthArXiv. 10.31223/X5GS46

Tavner C, Touzel D, Smith B (2021) Application of Long Endurance UAS for Top-Down Methane Emission Measurements of Oil and Gas Facilities in an Offshore Environment. SPE-205467-MS Paper presented at the SPE Offshore Europe Conference & Exhibition, Virtual. 10.2118/205467-MS

UNEP (2023a) ‘An Eye on Methane.’ (United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi)

UNEP (2023b) The Oil & Gas Methane Partnership 2.0. Available at https://ogmpartnership.com/